Belgium 6 March 2002 District Court Hasselt (Zapatos Mediterraneos v. Shoe Bizz)
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020306b1.html]
DATE OF DECISION:
JURISDICTION:
TRIBUNAL:
JUDGE(S):
CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: A.R. 2671/01
CASE NAME:
CASE HISTORY: Unavailable
SELLER'S COUNTRY: Spain (plaintiff)
BUYER'S COUNTRY: Belgium (defendant)
GOODS INVOLVED: Shoes
Reproduced with permission from CISG-Belgium database of Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Non-conformity – notice – reasonable period – end of season not reasonable
APPLICATION OF CISG: Yes APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES Key CISG provisions at issue: Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code
numbers:
7B1 [Interpretation of Convention: materials for interpretation (international case law)];
38A [Buyer's obligation to examine goods];
39A [Requirement to notify seller of lack of conformity: buyer must notify seller within reasonable time]
Descriptors:
Case outline
Classification of issues present
Editorial remarks
CITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION
(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable
(b) Other abstracts
Unavailable
CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION
Original language (Dutch): CISG-Belgium database of Katholieke Universiteit Leuven <http://www.law.kuleuven.ac.be/ipr/eng/cases/2002-03-06s.html>
Translation: Unavailable
CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION
English: CISG-AC advisory opinion on Examination of the Goods and Notice of Non-Conformity [7 June 2004] (this case and related cases cited in addendum to opinion); [2004] S.A. Kruisinga, (Non-)conformity in the 1980 UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods: a uniform concept?, Intersentia at 78; Article 78 and rate of interest: Mazzotta, Endless disagreement among commentators, much less among courts (2004) [citing this case and 275 other court and arbitral rulings]
Go to Case Table of Contents
Pace Law School
Institute of International Commercial Law - Last updated November 19, 2004