Belgium 10 April 2002 District Court Tongeren (Beer installation for pub case)
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020410b1.html]
DATE OF DECISION:
JURISDICTION:
TRIBUNAL:
JUDGE(S):
CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: AR A/01/00021
CASE NAME:
CASE HISTORY: Unavailable
SELLER'S COUNTRY: Belgium (plaintiff)
BUYER'S COUNTRY: Netherlands (defendant)
GOODS INVOLVED: Beer installation for pub
APPLICATION OF CISG: Yes
APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES
Key CISG provisions at issue:
Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code numbers:
Descriptors:
Overview comments (CISG-Belgium database): CISG applicable to beer installation sold and installed. Buyer cannot rely on non-conformity if he knew or should have known. Avoidance of contract not allowed -- not within reasonable period -- no evidence that repairs insufficient -- therefore, no fundamental breach.
Go to Case Table of ContentsCITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION
(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable
(b) Other abstracts
Unavailable
CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION
Original language (Dutch): CISG-Belgium database of Katholieke Universiteit Leuven <http://www.law.kuleuven.ac.be/ipr/eng/cases/2002-04-10.html>
Translation: Unavailable
CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION
Unavailable
Go to Case Table of Contents
Pace Law School
Institute of International Commercial Law - Last updated March 4, 2004