Belgium 26 May 2004 District Court Kortrijk (NV Garage Ma Camopagne v. Riverside Vehicle Rental Ltd.)
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040526b1.html]
DATE OF DECISION:
JURISDICTION:
TRIBUNAL:
JUDGE(S):
CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: AR 4143/2003
CASE NAME:
CASE HISTORY: Unavailable
SELLER'S COUNTRY: Belgium (plaintiff)
BUYER'S COUNTRY: United Kingdom (defendant)
GOODS INVOLVED: Cars
Reproduced with permission of CISG-Belgium database of Katholieke Universitiet Leuven
"Application of CISG accepted by both parties -- Time of delivery -- determined by contract -- not achieved because of attitude of buyer -- Mitigating loss -- seller resold cars to third party -- cannot lead to avoidance of contract -- Damages -- to be reduced by amount received from reselling cars"
Go to Case Table of ContentsAPPLICATION OF CISG: Yes
APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES
Key CISG provisions at issue:
Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code numbers:
Descriptors:
CITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION
(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable
(b) Other abstracts
Unavailable
CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION
Original language (Dutch): CISG-Belgium database of Katholieke Universiteit Leuven <http://www.law.kuleuven.ac.be/ipr/eng/cases/2004-05-26.html>
Translation: Unavailable
CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION
Unavailable
Go to Case Table of Contents
Pace Law School
Institute of International Commercial Law - Last updated July 7, 2004