Go to Database Directory || Go to CISG Table of Contents || Go to Case Search Form || Go to Bibliography
Search the entire CISG Database (case data + other data)

CISG CASE PRESENTATION

China 2 December 2004 High People's Court [Appellate Court] of Jiangsu Province (China Changzhou Kairui Weaving and Printing Company v. Taiwan Junlong Machinery Company) [Abstract available]
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041202c1.html]

Primary source(s) of information for case presentation: Case text

Case Table of Contents


Case identification

DATE OF DECISION: 20041202 (2 December 2004)

JURISDICTION: People's Republic of China

TRIBUNAL: High People's Court [Appellate Court] of Jiangsu Province

JUDGE(S): Unavailable

CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: Unavailable

CASE NAME: China Changzhou Kairui Weaving and Printing Company v. Taiwan Junlong Machinery Company

CASE HISTORY: 1st instance Changzhou Intermediate People's Court of Jiangsu Province

SELLER'S COUNTRY: Taiwan (plaintiff)

BUYER'S COUNTRY: People's Republic of China (defendant)

GOODS INVOLVED: Knitting machine


Case Abstract

Jiangsu High People's Court (Knitting machine case) of 2 December 2004

Abstract prepared by Meihua Xu

Changzhou Kairui Knitting and Printing Company (Appellant, Defendant in the first trail, hereafter "K Company") took objection to the decision made by Jiangsu Province Changzhou City Intermediate People's Court on the contract dispute between K Company, Changzhou Renshun Knitting and Printing Company (Defendant in the first trail, hereafter "R Company") and Junlong Machinery Company (Plaintiff in the first trail, hereafter, "Seller") and appealed to Jiangsu High People's Court.

From 1997, R Company purchased knitting machines and parts from the Seller, and Zhang, Yi purchased knitting machines and parts from the Seller in a Hong Kong company (hereafter, "H Company")'s name and delivered them to R Company (Zhang, Yi was a shareholder of H Company, but had sold his shares to others prior to the purchase of the goods in this case. During the performance of this contract, Zhang, Yi was contacting the Seller in R Company's name). However, R Company failed to make payment in accordance with the contract.

R Company was established in 1994 in Jiangsu, China with the legal representative of Zhang, Yi, who was also the legal representative of K Company. In 1998, shareholders of R Company decided to move R Company to the address of K Company, and Zhangyi used the machines R Company purchased from the Seller as his investment in K Company. The Seller asked the Court of First Instance to direct R Company and K Company to bear joint liability to make payment on the goods and the interest on the delayed payment.

The Court of First Instance ruled that based on ..., article 8(3) and 9(1) of the CISG [there is only this one sentence reference to the CISG], and ..., R Company shall pay the price for the goods and the interest on the delayed payment to the Seller, and that K Company shall bear joint liability for the aforesaid debt within the amount of acceptance of R Company's assets.

K Company appealed that it should not be the defendant; that it was an independent company from R Company.

The Appellate Court rules that R Company is the investor of K Company since R Company invested its major assets in K Company and moved to K Company's address, and the employees, assets, and administration of the two companies were mixed together, therefore, the aforesaid two companies were not independent entities. The Appellate Court, therefore, holds that the Court of First Instance erred in holding that R Company shall bear joint liability within the amount of the acceptance of R Company's assets. However, since the Seller failed to appeal on this issue, the Appellate Court affirms the decision made by the lower court and dismisses the Seller's appeal.

Go to Case Table of Contents

Classification of issues present

APPLICATION OF CISG: Yes

APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES

Key CISG provisions at issue: Articles 8(3) ; 9(1)

Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code numbers:

Unavailable

Descriptors: Unavailable

Go to Case Table of Contents

Editorial remarks

Go to Case Table of Contents

Citations to case abstracts, texts, and commentaries

CITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION

(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable

(b) Other abstracts

Unavailable

CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION

Original language (Chinese): CISG-China Case [HPC/15]: <http://aff.whu.edu.cn/cisgchina/en/news_view.asp?newsid=86>

Translation: Unavailable

CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION

Unavailable

Go to Case Table of Contents
Pace Law School Institute of International Commercial Law - Last updated May 12, 2010
Comments/Contributions
Go to Database Directory || Go to CISG Table of Contents || Go to Case Search Form || Go to Bibliography