CISG CASE PRESENTATION

Netherlands 4 February 2005 Supreme Court (Isocab France S.A. v. Indus Projektbouw B.V.)
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050204n1.html]

Primary source(s) of information for case presentation: Netherlands rechtspraak website <http://www.rechtspraak.nl>

Case Table of Contents

DATE OF DECISION: 20050204 (4 February 2005)

JURISDICTION: Netherlands

TRIBUNAL: Hoge Raad [Supreme Court]

JUDGE(S): Unavailable

CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: LJN: AR6187; C0/007HR

CASE NAME: Isocab France S.A. v. Indus Projektbouw B.V.

CASE HISTORY: Unavailable

SELLER'S COUNTRY: France (defendant)

BUYER'S COUNTRY: Netherlands (plaintiff)

GOODS INVOLVED: Panels for construction of green house

APPLICATION OF CISG: Yes

APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES

Key CISG provisions at issue: Article 39

Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code numbers:

39A [Requirement to notify seller within reasonable time: buyer must notify seller within reasonable time]

Descriptors: Lack of conformity notice ; timeliness

CITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION

(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable

(b) Other abstracts

English: Unilex database <http://www.unilex.info/case.cfm?pid=1&do=case&id=1049&step=Abstract>

CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION

Original language (Dutch): Netherlands Rechtspraak website <http://www.rechtsraak.nl>; Unilex database <http://www.unilex.info/case.cfm?pid=1&do=case&id=1049&step=FullText>

Translation: Unavailable

CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION

Unavailable

Pace Law School Institute of International Commercial Law - Last updated November 30, 2005