United States 27 April 2005 U.S. District Court [Alabama] (Treibacher Industrie, A.G. v. TDY Industries, Inc.)
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050427u1.html]
DATE OF DECISION:
JURISDICTION:
TRIBUNAL:
JUDGE(S):
CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: CV-01-HS-2872-NE
CASE NAME:
CASE HISTORY: Proceedings pending before U.S. Court of Appeals (11th Circuit); see Appellant's Opening Brief, dated 6 July 2005; Brief of Appellee, dated 8 August 2005; Appellant's Reply Brief, dated 1 September 2005. Court of Appeals decision 12 September 2006 [affirmed]
SELLER'S COUNTRY: Austria (plaintiff)
BUYER'S COUNTRY: United States (plaintiff)
GOODS INVOLVED: Hard metal powders
APPLICATION OF CISG: Yes
APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES
Key CISG provisions at issue:
Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code numbers:
3C [Sale of goods: what constitutes a "sale"]; 4B [Scope of Convention (issues excluded): fraud]; 8A ; 8C [Intent of party making statement or engaging in conduct; Interpretation in light of surrounding circumstances]; 9A ; 9B ; 9C [International usages; Practices established by the parties]; 11B [Proof of contract by any means, including witnesses]; 74A ; 74B [General rules for measuring damages: loss suffered as consequence of breach; Outer limits of damages: foreseeability of loss]; 77A [Obligation to take reasonable measures to mitigate damages]; 78A ; 78B [Interest on delay in receiving price or any other sum in arrears; Rate of interest]
Descriptors:
CITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION
(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable
(b) Other abstracts
Unavailable
CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION
Original language (English): Memorandum of Decision, dated 27 April 2005; Memorandum Opinion and Order, dated 27 April 2005; Order of Judgment, dated 27 April 2007
Translation: Unavailable
CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION
Unavailable
Go to Case Table of Contents
Pace Law School
Institute of International Commercial Law - Last updated September 14, 2006