Go to Database Directory || Go to CISG Table of Contents || Go to Case Search Form || Go to Bibliography
Search the entire CISG Database (case data + other data)

CISG CASE PRESENTATION

Poland 20 November 2008 Warsaw Court of Appeals (Truck case)
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081120p1.html]

Primary source(s) of information for case presentation: UNCITRAL case abstract

Case Table of Contents


Case identification

DATE OF DECISION: 20081120 (20 November 2008)

JURISDICTION: Poland

TRIBUNAL: Warsaw Court of Appeals

JUDGE(S): Unavailable

CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: I ACa 1258/07

CASE NAME: Unavailable

CASE HISTORY: Unavailable

SELLER'S COUNTRY: Polish

BUYER'S COUNTRY: Ukraine

GOODS INVOLVED: Mercedes Actros truck


UNCITRAL case abstract

POLAND: Warsaw Court of Appeals 20 November 2008

Case law on UNCITRAL texts [A/CN.9/SER.C/ABSTRACTS/137],
CLOUT abstract no. 1305

Reproduced with permission of UNCITRAL

Abstract prepared by Maciej Zachariasiewicz, National Correspondent

A Polish seller and a Ukrainian buyer concluded a contract for the sale of a Mercedes Actros truck. The contract contained a clause according to which “it was valid until 8 August 2006”, which stood 90 days after its conclusion. The seller failed to deliver and refused to return the price paid by the Ukrainian party, who sued before a Polish court.

The court of first instance (District Court) dismissed the claim as premature. It found that the buyer had not set an additional period of time as required by Article 49(1)(b) CISG and had never declared the contract avoided. The court concluded that the parties were still bound by the contract and that the buyer could not yet request the reimbursement of the price.

The Court of Appeals reversed the decision and ordered the seller to reimburse the price. It found that Article 49(1)(b) cannot be relied upon in the case at hand because of the express clause in the contract providing for its termination within 90 days from its conclusion. The court reasoned that the parties were entitled under Article 6 CISG to shape the contract as they saw fit, which inter alia allowed them to introduce a provision for an automatic termination of the contract within a certain period of time. In the opinion of the Court of Appeals, the lower court wrongly assumed that the “90 days validity” clause had no meaning. Conversely, it found that the clause was dictated by the Ukrainian customs regulations, which require to complete any international business transaction within 90 days from the conclusion of the contract and which provide sanctions for violating that rule. Thus, the parties, having been aware of the said regulation at the time of the conclusion of the contract, consciously established a period, after expiry of which the contract was to come to an end.

The Court of Appeals further stated that the Convention does not expressly govern the consequences of the termination of a contract as a result of the lapse of contractually established time limit. However, in light of Article 7 CISG, which calls for the application of the general principles on which the Convention is based, the rules governing the effects of the avoidance of contract must be considered. More specifically, the issue is regulated by Article 81(2) CISG which provides that a party who has performed the contract may claim restitution of whatever it has paid under the contract to the other party. Consequently, the Court ordered the Polish seller to reimburse the full price to the Ukrainian buyer and to pay the interest from the date on which the price was paid, as required by Article 84(1) CISG.

Go to Case Table of Contents

Classification of issues present

APPLICATION OF CISG: [-]

APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES

Key CISG provisions at issue: Articles 6 ; 7 ; 49(1)(b) ; 81(2) ; 84(1)

Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code numbers:

Unavailable

Descriptors: Unavailable

Go to Case Table of Contents

Editorial remarks

Go to Case Table of Contents

Citations to other abstracts, case texts and commentaries

CITATIONS TO OTHER ABSTRACTS OF DECISION

Unavailable

CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION

Original language (Polish): Republic of Poland website <http://www.sn.pl>

Translation: Unavailable

CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION

Unavailable

Go to Case Table of Contents
Pace Law School Institute of International Commercial Law - Last updated December 6, 2013
Comments/Contributions
Go to Database Directory || Go to CISG Table of Contents || Go to Case Search Form || Go to Bibliography