Netherlands 10 May 1995 District Court Utrecht (Armor v. Triple P.)
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950510n1.html]
Primary source(s) for case presentation: Michael R. Will
DATE OF DECISION:
JURISDICTION:
TRIBUNAL:
JUDGE(S):
CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: 22688/HAZA 93-1718 HS
CASE NAME:
CASE HISTORY: 2d instance Hof Amsterdam 19 September 1996 [reversing]
SELLER'S COUNTRY: France (plaintiff)
BUYER'S COUNTRY: Netherlands (defendant)
GOODS INVOLVED: Typewriter Ribbons
APPLICATION OF CISG: [-]
APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES
Key CISG provisions at issue:
Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code
numbers:
Descriptors:
(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable
(b) Other abstracts
Unavailable
CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION
Original language (Dutch): [1998] 16 Nederlands International Privaatrecht (NIPR) No. 94 [105-106] (with applellate opinion)
Translation: Unavailable
CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION
UnavailableClassification of issues present
Editorial remarks
Citations to case abstracts, texts, and commentaries
CITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION
Pace Law School Institute of International
Commercial Law - Last updated February 7, 2002