France 21 November 1996 Appellate Court Aix-en-Provence (Schreiber v. Thermo Dynamique) [translation available]
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961121f1.html]
DATE OF DECISIONS:
JURISDICTION:
TRIBUNAL:
JUDGE(S):
CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: 94118531
CASE NAME:
CASE HISTORY: 1st instance Tribunal de commerce de Toulon 27 July 1994; 3d instance Cour de Cassation 26 May 1999 [affirming]
SELLER'S COUNTRY: Germany [defendant]
BUYER'S COUNTRY: France [plaintiff]
GOODS INVOLVED: Laminated sheet metal
APPLICATION OF CISG: Yes
APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES
Key CISG provisions at issue:
Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code numbers:
38A1 [Time for examining the goods: buyer's obligation to examine goods as soon as practicable in the circumstances]; 39A [Requirement to notify seller of lack of conformity: buyer must
notify seller within reasonable time] 74A [General rules for measuring damages: loss suffered as
consequence of breach];
84A [Restitution of benefits received: seller bound to refund price must pay interest]
Descriptors:
CITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION
(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable
(b) Other abstracts
Unavailable
CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION
Original language (French): CISG - France website "http://Witz.jura.uni-sb.de/CISG/decisions/211196v.htm"
Translation (English): Translation of case text presented with English translation of ruling of Supreme Court, Cour de Cassation 26 May 1999.
CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION
English: Witz, ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Vol. 11/No. 2 (Fall 2000) 18 n. 28 [Article 39 issues]; [2004] S.A. Kruisinga, (Non-)conformity in the 1980 UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods: a uniform concept?, Intersentia at 86; Schwenzer & Fountoulakis ed., International Sales Law, Routledge-Cavendish (2007) at p. 313
Go to Case Table of Contents
Pace Law School
Institute of International Commercial Law - Last updated February 9, 2007