CISG CASE PRESENTATION

Austria 9 December 1996 District Court Wels (Pineapples case)
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961209a3.html]

Case Table of Contents

• Case identification
• Classification of issues present
• Editorial remarks
• Citations to case abstracts, texts, and commentaries
• Guide to links contained in case presentations

Case identification

DATE OF DECISIONS: 19961209 (9 December 1996)

JURISDICTION: Austria

TRIBUNAL: BG Wels [BG = Bezirksgericht = District Court]

JUDGE(S): Unavailable

CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: 9 C 408/93k-55

CASE NAME: Austrian case citations do not generally identify parties to proceedings

CASE HISTORY: 2d instance LG Wells (22 R 85/97z) 21 April 1997 [partly reversing and remanding]; 3d instance OGH 30 June 1998 [reversing]

SELLER'S COUNTRY: Germany (plaintiff)

BUYER'S COUNTRY: Austria (defendant)

GOODS INVOLVED: Pineapples

Classification of issues present

APPLICATION OF CISG: [-]

APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES

Key CISG provisions at issue: Articles 2 ; 6 ; 9(1)

Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code numbers:

Unavailable

Descriptors: Unavailable

Go to Case Table of Contents

Editorial remarks

• Unavailable

Go to Case Table of Contents

Citations to case abstracts, texts, and commentaries

CITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION

(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable

(b) Other abstracts

Unavailable

CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION

Original language (German): Unavailable

Translation: Unavailable

CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION

Unavailable