Belgium 28 April 1999 District Court Hasselt (Wallpaper case)
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990428b1.html]
DATE OF DECISION:
JURISDICTION:
TRIBUNAL:
JUDGE(S):
CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: A.R. 456/99
CASE NAME:
CASE HISTORY: Unavailable
SELLER'S COUNTRY: Netherlands (plaintiff)
BUYER'S COUNTRY: Belgium (defendant)
GOODS INVOLVED: Wallpaper
APPLICATION OF CISG: Yes
APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES
Key CISG provisions at issue:
Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code numbers:
Descriptors:
Overview comments (CISG-Belgium database): "General conditions – not accepted – not part of contract. Damages – still allowed on basis of art. 74 of CISG – ex aequo et bono – 10% -- not too much – Dutch plaintiff had to come to Belgium. Interest – still allowed – Belgian legal interest rate (invoices in Belgian francs)."”
Go to Case Table of Contents
CITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION
(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable
(b) Other abstracts
Unavailable
CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION
Original language (Dutch): CISG-Belgium database of Katholieke Universiteit Leuven <http://www.law.kuleuven.ac.be/ipr/eng/cases/1999-04-28.html>
Translation: Unavailable
CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION
Unavailable
Go to Case Table of Contents
Pace Law School
Institute of International Commercial Law - Last updated March 4, 2004