CISG DATABASE
 
 

Recently added cases, case translations and commentaries
[New material added in November 2013]


2012: January || February || March || April || May || June || July || August || September || October || November || December
2013: January || February || March || April || May || June || July || August || September || October || November || December || latest updates

Cases and case translations added to database in November 2013
[new material identified in red]

FRANCE 30 April 2013 Appellate Court Reims (Light chains case). Art. 3, 35, 36, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

ITALY 3 June 2012 Tribunale di Forli [District Court] (Olive and vegetable oil case). Arts. 1, 30, 53, 78

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

FRANCE 24 May 2012 Appellate Court d’Aix-en-Provence (Citrus case). Arts. 9, 35, 39, 50

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

FRANCE 27 June 2011 Appellate Court Bordeaux (Stave making machine case). Arts. 6, 35, 36, 38, 39, 45, 49, 74, 75, 76, 77, 82

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

FRANCE 23 November 2010 Appellate Court Colmar (Induction Cooktops). Arts. 7, 38, 39

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

REPUBLIC OF KOREA 14 October 2010 Seoul High Court (Cotton seed case). Arts. 53, 54, 64(1)(a), 64(1)(b) [abstract added]

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

FRANCE 22 June 2010 Appellate Court Lyon (Bags case). Arts. 7, 35, 36, 39

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

FRANCE 12 May 2010 Appellate Court Paris (Pears case). Arts. 11, 29

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

REPUBLIC OF KOREA 29 April 2010 Daegu District Court. Arts. 25, 73(1), 73(2), [abstract added]

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

REPUBLIC OF KOREA 13 April 2010 Suwon District Court (Cars case). Arts. 74, 81(1), 81(2) [abstract added]

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

FRANCE 18 March 2010 Appellate Court Paris. Art. 31

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

ISRAEL 17 January 2010 Supreme Court (Oil filter case). Art. 38, 39

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

FRANCE 12 January 2010 Appellate Court Lyon (Bags case). Art. 36, 39

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

REPUBLIC OF KOREA 23 July 2009 Seoul High Court (Duck feathers case). Arts. 25, 73(1), 73(2), 74, 75 [abstract added]

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

REPUBLIC OF KOREA 23 February 2009 Seoul High Court (Clothing case). Art. 74 [abstract added]

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

FRANCE 12 February 2009 Appellate Court Paris (Network terminals case). Art. [-]

REPUBLIC OF KOREA 19 December 2008 Seoul Central District Court (Crude oil case). Arts. 53, 54, 61(1), 64(1), 74, 75, 77 [abstract added]

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

REPUBLIC OF KOREA 5 December 2008 Seoul Central District Court (Clothing case). Arts. 35(1), 49, 75 [abstract added]

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

FRANCE 27 August 2008 Appellate Court Colmar (Plastic granulate case). Arts. 39, 49, 25, 74

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

FRANCE 19 February 2004 Appellate Court Versailles (Perfume case). Arts. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 71, 73

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

AUSTRIA 30 August 2002 Oberster Gerichtshof (Jewelry case). Arts. [-]

FRANCE 18 June 2002 Appellate Court Paris (Horse meat case). Arts. 1, 5, 36

- Key issues identified in this newly reported case

Texts of commentaries to be added to database in November 2013

KLIMAS, Tadas

2013. The Questionable Reception of the CISG in the Baltic States, Belarus, Bulgaria & the Ukraine, Social Science Research Network (October 2, 2013) available online at <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2334777>

NWAFOR, Ndubuisi Augustine

2013. Comparative evaluation of the doctrine of fundamental breach under the CISG, UNIDROIT Principles and the English law, Social Science Research Network (October 15, 2013) available online at <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2340440>

Citations to be added to database bibliography

CASTELLANOS, Ruiz, E.

2012. El valor de los Incoterms para precisar el juez del lugar de entrega [ - in Spanish], 4 Cuadernos de derecho transnacional (Madrid) no. 2 (2012) 93-122

FERRARI, Franco [Italy]

2013. The CISG’s Interpretative Goals, Its Interpretative Method and Its General Principles in Case Law (part II), 13 Internationales Handelsrecht (München) (5/2013) 181-197



©Pace Law School Institute of International Commercial Law - Last updated November 22, 2013