CISG Article 65 ULIS Article 67
1. If under the contract the 1. If the contract reserves to
buyer is to specify the form, the buyer the right subsequently
measurement or other features to determine the form,
of the goods and he fails to make measurement or other features
such specification either on the of the goods (sale by specification)
date agreed upon or within a and he fails to make such
reasonable time after receipt of specification either on the date
a request from the seller, the expressly or impliedly agreed upon
seller may, without prejudice to or within a reasonable time after
any other rights he may have, receipt of a request from the seller,
make the specification himself the seller may declare the contract
in accordance with the avoided, provided that he does so
requirements of the buyer that promptly, or make the specification
may be known to him. himself in accordance with the
requirements of the buyer in so far
2. If the seller makes the as these are known to him.
specification himself, he must
inform the buyer of the details 2. If the seller makes the
thereof and must fix a reasonable specification himself, he shall inform
time within which the buyer may the buyer of the details thereof
make a different specification. and shall fix a reasonable period
If, after receipt of such a of time within which the buyer
communication, the buyer fails may submit a different specification.
to do so within the time so fixed, If the buyer fails to do so the
the specification made by the specification made by the seller
seller is binding. shall be binding.
"ULIS contains a special rule . . . regarding the seller's right to specify certain features of the goods (Article 67 ULIS). Article 65 CISG is based on that rule. However, the ULIS rule was criticised in one respect during the sessions of the Working Group.
Under Article 67(1) ULIS the seller has the automatic right to declare the contract avoided if the buyer fails to specify the relevant features of the goods on the date agreed or within a reasonable time after receipt of a request from the seller. The Working Group took the view that this immediate right to avoid the contract was too harsh and not in line with the rest of the system governing breaches of contract. The immediate right to avoid the contract was then deleted and the general system of remedies stated to be applicable. . . ." Hager in Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods, Peter Schlechtriem ed. (Oxford 1998) 496 [citations omitted].
Comments on the match-up
Pace Law School Institute of
International Commercial Law
- Last updated June 17, 1998
Comments/Contributions