Taming the Dragons of the Law

Go to Database Directory || Go to Country Case Schedule || Go to Case Search Form

Taming the Dragons of Uniform Law Case Law:
Sharing the reasoning of courts and arbitral tribunals

Schedule of English case texts and translated case texts

["Taming the Dragons of Uniform Law" (title purloined from a scholar who coined it in another context) is a report on sharings of judicial reasoning in 1,421 English texts and English translations of court and arbitral awards on the UN Convention on Contracts for International Sale of Goods (CISG). "Dragon taming" is also an overture. We invite colleagues to serve our profession and the world trade community with us by collaborating on additional case translations.]

Calling attention to the need to consider foreign case law to "promote ... the uniform application of the CISG", Ferrari identifies uniform-law dragons. He states:

"[R]equiring interpreters to consider foreign decisions can create practical difficulties. On the one hand, foreign case law is not readily available, i.e., it cannot easily be retrieved. On the other hand, foreign case law is often written in a language unknown to the interpreter."[*]

[*] Franco Ferrari, "Applying the CISG in a Truly Uniform Manner, Uniform Law Review (2001-1) 206 [citations omitted].

To comply with the mandate recited in article 7(1) CISG, courts must have due regard to the "international character" of the CISG "and to the need to promote uniformity in its application," and scholars must be equipped to assist judges struggling to comprehend the ramifications and applications of this uniform international sales law. Schlechtriem reminds us of a corollary responsibility of scholars. He states:

A major help scholars can provide is by analyzing the cases of their countries and of other countries "as thoroughly as possible to present the full picture of interpretations and applications to our jurists."[*]

[*] Peter Schlechtriem, "Uniform Sales Law - The Experience with Uniform Sales Law in the Federal Republic of Germany", 3 Juridisk Tidskrift 1 (1991-92) 16 (emphasis added).

In collaboration with centers of learning of many countries <"http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/network.html">, we make CISG case law of all countries freely and readily available <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu> on the Internet. We provide:

English texts of rulings of rulings on the CISG by courts of Australia, Canada, and the United States and texts of arbitral awards on our uniform law handed down in English by ICC and Stockholm Chamber of Commerce arbitral tribunals, and by arbitral tribunals of Switzerland;
English translations of rulings on the CISG by courts of Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Russia, Spain, Switzerland and Vietnam, including rulings of the Supreme Courts of Argentina, Austria, Colombia, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Netherlands, Spain and Switzerland, and of arbitral interpretations of the CISG handed down by ICC tribunals and tribunals of Egypt, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Mexico, Russia, Sweden, Switzerland and Yugoslavia.

In ruling on an international convention, Lord Denning stated: We are told that there have been no decisions so far in other countries on this article of the convention ... So where we lead, others may follow. But I would like to assure them that if it had come first before them, we would be only too glad to follow them."[*]

[*]James Buchanan & Co Ltd v Babco Forwarding and Shipping (U.K.) Ltd [1977] 1 All ER 518 (CA) at 522, 524, [1977] 2 WRL 107 (CA) at 113, 113-14; reinforced by Fothergill v Monarch Airlines [1981] AC 252 (HL), [1980] All ER 696 (HL).

We also report compatible views of representatives of Latin American (Argentina), Scandinavian (Finland), United States, and German legal cultures, and of another English jurist. Representatives of many legal cultures favor consideration of decisions of courts of sister signatories. High courts, for example, the U.S. Supreme Court, urge us to give them "considerable weight".

Antonio Boggiano and Lord Scarman state: "Uniform law requires ... a new common law" in which "[f]oreign precedents would not be precedents of a foreign law, but of uniform law";[*] "[c]ourts ... have to develop their jurisprudence in company with the courts of other countries ..." Lief Sevón states that a judge ought to be "obliged to search for and take into consideration foreign judgments ... at least the judgments from other Contracting States, when he is faced with a problem of interpretation of an international convention."[**]
The U.S. Supreme Court, Boggiano, and Jürgen Schwarze state that "the opinions of our sister signatories [to an international convention] are to be entitled to considerable weight"; they are to be taken into account "in a comparative and critical manner"; with the "integrative force of a judgment ... based on the persuasive reasoning which the decisions of the Court bring to bear on the problem at hand."[***]

CISG article 7(1) is the law of every country that has adopted the UN Sales Convention; the comity -- comity is the keyword -- that article 7(1) calls for is to the same effect.

*Antonio Boggiano [Argentina], "The Experience of Latin American States, in: International Uniform Law in Practice / Le droit uniform international dans la pratique, Oceana: New York (1988) 47. ** Lord Scarman [England], [1980] 2 All E.R 696, 715; Lief Sevón [Finland], "Observations", in: International Uniform Law in Practice, op. cit. at 135. *** El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui Yuan Tseng, 525 U.S. 155, 176 (1999), quoting Air France v. Saks, 470 U.S. 392, 404 [1985] (defining the term "accident" as used in the Warsaw Convention); Boggiano, op. cit. at 47; Jürgen Schwarze [Germany], "The Role of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the Interpretation of Uniform Law among the Member States of the European Communities", in: International Law and Practice, op. cit. at 221.

There have been fine judicial implementations of the jurisconsultorium that CISG article 7(1) contemplates:

Courts of Italy and Switzerland have taken the lead; see Tribunale di Cuneo 31 January 1996 and Obergericht Luzern 8 January 1997. United States and German courts have followed suit; see Medical Marketing v. International Medico Scientifica, 17 May 1999; MCC-Marble v. Ceramica Nuova, 29 June 1998 (reference to the Internet by a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to ensure thorough research of case law from other jurisdictions); and Usinor Industeel v. Leeco Steel Products 28 March 2002 (citation of Australian case by U.S. Federal District Court); see also Bundesgerichtshof 24 March 1999, a German Supreme Court ruling that cites CISG authorities from England, France, Switzerland and the United States, and Cour d'appel Grenoble 23 October 1996, a French case that quotes a German court decision.
Referring to Medical Marketing, Schlechtriem states: "The U.S. federal court regards a foreign court decision as precedent, or at least as 'authority' and thus treats uniform international law similar to American law with the -- for American courts self-understood -- consideration given to decisions of neighboring states under the (American) common law. In other words, it treated the CISG as a kind of international common law, the application and development of which is in the hands of all nations party to the Convention, which courts must therefore also give consideration to decisions in other countries." Peter Schlechtriem [translated text of commentary], Praxis des International Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (1999) 791. The U.S. court's comity is reciprocated by the Landgericht [District Court] of Trier in an 8 January 2004 German court decision that cites Chateau des Charmes Wines v. Sabate USA, a 5 May 2003 U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision.
An Italian court in Rheinland Versicherungen v. Atlarex S.r.l 12 July 2000 expands the comity that CISG article 7(1) contemplates. This is a ruling of the Tribunale di Vigevano in which the judge evaluates American, Austrian, Dutch, French, German, Italian and Swiss court rulings as well as arbitral awards in reasoning through the CISG issues he addresses, drawing on national reporters, texts and Internet websites for his case data. This court has, "more than any other court before it, taken into account the need to have regard to foreign case law in order to promote uniformity."[*] For more recent cases from Italy that follow this lead, see the 26 November 2002 ruling of the Tribunale di Rimini, the 25 February 2004 ruling of the Tribunali di Padova, and the 31 March 2004 ruling of the Tribunali di Padova. See also Chicago Prime Packers v. Norham, a U.S. Federal District Court case handed down on 24 May 2004 that cites German, Italian and Dutch jurisprudence as well as U.S. case law on the CISG, and Bundesgerichtshof 30 June 2004, a ruling of the German Supreme Court that cites court decisions of Canada and The Netherlands and arbitral rulings of the ICC and Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, as well as German case law on the CISG.
* Franco Ferrari, "Applying the CISG in a Truly Uniform Manner", Uniform Law Review (2001-1) 208.

This is encouraging.[*] To stimulate more such comity -- similar to the comity U.S. state courts traditionally accord UCC rulings by courts of sister U.S. states -- jurists of all countries should consider decisions handed down in sister jurisdictions.

Can there be such a concept as ipso facto stare decisis? Henschel has coined this concept. He cites the 5 March 1998 "New Zealand mussels" ruling of the Federal Supreme Court of Germany in that context, calling attention to acceptance of its ratio decidendi in Austria and the United States. He cites the Medical Marketing ruling of the U.S. District Court, E.D. of Lousiana, 17 May 1999 and a 13 April 2000 ruling of the Federal Supreme Court of Austria, and points also to an earlier French ruling that is in accord, Cour d'appel de Grenoble of 13 September 1995.[**]

To consider decisions of sister jurisdictions, courts must be able to read them. The Institute of International Commercial Law of the Pace University School of Law, in collaboration with the Centre for Commercial Law Studies of Queen Mary College of the University of London, has inaugurated an English text program and case translation programme.

* We have also seen other cases, e.g., from the United States: Filanto v. Chilewich, 789 F. Supp. 1229, 1237 (S.D.N.Y. 14 April 1992) ("there is as yet virtually no U.S. case law interpreting the Sale of Goods Convention"); Beijing Metals v. American Business Center, 993 F.2d 1178 (5^th Cir. 15 June 1993) (citing Filanto "there is as yet virtually no U.S. case law interpreting the Sale of Goods Convention"); Delchi v. Rotorex, 71 F.3d 1024, 1028 (2^nd Cir 1995) ("there is virtually no case law under the Convention"); Helen Kaminski v. Marketing Australian Products, 1997 U.S. Dist. Lexis 10630 (S.D.N.Y. 23 July 1997) ("there is little to no case law on the CISG . . ."); Calzaturificio Claudia v. Olivieri Footwear, 1998 U.S. Dist. Lexis 4586 (S.D.N.Y/ 6 April 1998) ("The case law interpreting and applying the CISG is sparse", citing and quoting Kaminski "there is 'little to no case law on the CISG . . .' " and Filanto "there is virtually no United States case law interpreting the CISG"); Mitchell Aircraft Spares v. European Aircraft Service, 25 F. Supp. 2d 916 (N.D. Ill. 27 October 1998)) (" 'there is virtually no case law under the Convention' ", quoting Delchi); Supermicro Computer v. Digitechnic, 2001 U.S. Dist. Lexis 7620 (N.D. Cal. 30 January 2001) ("the case law interpreting and applying the CISG is sparse", citing Delchi); Schmitz-Werke v. Rockland, 2002 U.S. App. Lexis 12336 (4th Cir. 21 June 2002) ("case law interpreting the CISG is rather sparse", citing Calzaturificio Claudia); and most recently Macromex Srl. v. Globex International Inc., 2008 WL 1752530 (S.D.N.Y. 16 April 2008) "there is virtually no case law under the Convention", quoting Delchi).

Contrast the case research by these courts with Flechtner's assessment of the case research that CISG article 7(1) requires. He states that article 7(1) of the CISG "[p]roperly understood ... requires a process or methodology involving awareness of ... interpretations of the CISG from outside one's own legal culture -- an approach not unlike the treatment U.S. courts accord decisions of other [U.S.] jurisdictions when applying [the U.S.] Uniform Commercial Code." Harry M. Flechtner, "Several Texts of the CISG in a Decentralized System: Observations on Translations, Reservations and Other Challenges to the Uniformity Principle in Article 7(1)", 17 Journal of Law & Commerce (1998) 187 <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/flecht1.html>. Hackney elaborates. He states that "when interpreting the Convention, a court should look to other court's interpretations of the Convention, including the interpretations of courts from other countries" and that "[t]he use in the U.S. of case law to interpret the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) can serve as a model for courts using case law to interpret the Convention. No state within the U.S. is bound by an interpretation of the UCC from another state, but the interpretations of the UCC from other jurisdictions are extremely persuasive. While this method does not achieve exact uniformity, the U.S. has achieved a level of uniformity of sales law that is useful to companies transacting business in many states." Philip T. Hackney, "Is the United Nations Convention on the International Sale of Goods Achieving Uniformity?, 61 Louisiana Law Review (2001) 479.

** René Henschel, Conformity of Goods in International Sales Governed by the CISG, Nordic Journal of Commercial Law, issue 2004 #1, article 2 at 9.

The MCC-Marble court advises that the website <http://cisg.law.pace.edu> is "a promising source" for "persuasive authority from courts of other states party to the CISG" (op. cit. at n.14). For a current example of reliance on the global jurisconsultorium by counsel, go to Trebacher Industrie, A.G. v. TDT, and the appellate pleading reported with the presentation of that case at <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050427u1.html>.

This website reports over 2,000 cases <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/text/casecit.html>. They are cases from 30 jurisdictions. Each case can be relevant to the interpretation of the CISG in any jurisdiction.

Drawing on the cases reported on our website, Pace and Queen Mary, in collaboration with scholars of many countries, have inaugurated an English text program and a case translation programme. The [QM] programme currently includes translations of over 90 Supreme Court or Highest Constitutional Court decisions and numerous other decisions. Pace and [QM] wish to expand this work. We enlist your help.
We have invited participation in the case translation programme by interested members of the Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot Alumni Association (MAA) and others. [For information on our Moot on the CISG, go to <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/vis.html>.] We invite participation by all interested persons with language fluencies who believe in the concept of uniform law and would like to help us tame the dragons of case law. Join us. Help us serve our profession and the world trade community this way. Contacts are: Loukas A. Mistelis <L.Mistelis@qmw.ac.uk> or Albert H. Kritzer <akritzer@law.pace.edu>.

The object of the programme is to share lessons learned by sharing the reasoning of jurists of all countries. The English texts and translated texts we now provide chart as follows.

Chart of 1,421 "tamed and assigned dragons"

Jurisdiction	Lower Court	Appellate Court	Supreme Court	Arbitral Tribunal	Totals
American Arb. Assoc.				2	2
Argentina	4	5			9
Australia	5	4			9
Austria	2	19	51	3	75
Belarus				1	1
Belgium	21	18			39
Bulgaria				12	12
Canada	8	1			9
China	12	14	4	276	306
Colombia			1		1
Denmark	2	2	1		5
Egypt				2	2
Estonia		1			1
Finland	2	6			8
France	4	35	21		60
Germany	125	123	22	6	275
Hungary	2		2	4	8
ICC				43	43
Iran Tribunal				1	1
Israel			1		1
Italy	16	4	8	2	30
Mexico	4	2		3	9
Netherlands	14	11	2	3	30
New Zealand	2	3			5
Poland			3		30
Russia	1	20	9	186	216
Singapore			1		1
Spain	5	26	3		34
Stockholm Chamber of Commerce				3	3
Switzerland	50	40	18	1	109
Ukraine				19	19
United Kingdom		2			2
United States	65	15			80
Vietnam		1			1
Yugoslavia				1	1
Totals	345	361	146	568	1,421

We list two categories of cases: [QM] cases processed pursuant to the Queen Mary Case Translation Programme <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/text/queenmary.html>, and other cases.

Three levels of scholars review each [QM] case translation prior to its publication as an integrated part of an Internet case presentation.
- Researchers can link to these case translations, and we offer links to presentations that contain additional data on each case. As a general rule, the contents of each case presentation also include an abstract of the case (usually an UNCITRAL abstract) and a link to the original text of the case, a case text generally entered on the Internet by the center for international studies of a collaborating university, a member of the Autonomous Network of CISG Websites <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/network.html>. The typical linked table of contents to our case presentations reads:
  - Case identification
  - UNCITRAL case abstract
  - Classification of issues present
  - Editorial remarks
  - Citations to other case abstracts, texts and commentaries
  - Text of case
  - English translation of text of case
  By jumping from these underlined links in the case presentations, researchers can access additional information on each case, often including full texts of scholarly commentaries on the case. Other case presentation features include links to key provisions of the CISG at issue, links that enable researchers to jump to other interpretations of the provisions of the uniform law that are reviewed in the case you are considering. These are links to other judicial and arbitral interpretations of these provisions by tribunals of different countries. Our case presentations also link to Annotated texts of Articles of the CISG <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/text/cisg-toc.html>. Our Annotated texts provide additional information on the provisions of the CISG of interest: information on their legislative history, on doctrine associated with these provisions, etc.
- The listings in the report below identify final texts of [QM] case translations and [QM] case translations that are still "second-iteration" texts, i.e., draft translations. These are underlined listings preceded by asterisks. Researchers may jump to these draft translations too. All such translations are, of course, accompanied by the caveat associated with any draft. Even so, we regard it as helpful to share our [QM] drafts with researchers anxious to access the most current information we have because, due to the caliber of scholars the [QM] programme has attracted, it has been our experience that further edits to second-iterations translations such as these have generally proved to be modest.
- The following report also identifies still other [QM] case translations, case translations in process. Those listings are not underlined; researchers cannot now jump from them to the texts of in-process translations. These are "coming-attractions" we provide to identify case translations that have not yet progressed to the "second-iteration" stage of the [QM] Case Translation Programme. For such listings, in lieu of providing links to drafts of translated texts, we simply report the cases to identify translations that will be made available at a future date. We do, however, provide links to presentations that contain other information on those cases: generally an abstract of the case, a link to the text of the case in its original language, and other relevant material on the case.

The entries in our country-by-country schedule of case presentations number over 2,000 <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/text/casecit.html>. The entries in the following report on English case texts and case translations number 1,421. This, of course, means we have many more cases to translate. With your help, we will increase the number of translated case texts we can offer to our profession. The date of the following report is 12 May 2008. Each of the 1,421 cases we report is identified by URL; researchers who wish to jump to these case texts and case translations may do so by clicking these URLs.

Our "dragon taming" programme
We invite you to participate

[For persons unfamiliar with the courts we cite -- drawing on material developed by Autonomous Network colleagues, we present court hierarchy charts for many of these jurisdictions <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/text/casecit.html>. This collection of court hierarchy charts will be expanded.]

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

23 October 2007 AAA Interim Award Case No. 50181T 0036406 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071023a5.html>
12 December 2007 AAA Final Award Case No. 50181T 0036406 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071212a5.html>

ARGENTINA

* 20 May 1991, Elastar Sacifia v. Bettcher Industries Inc., Juzgado Nacional [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cisg/cases/910520a1.html>
* 23 October 1991, Aguila Refractarios v. Conc. preventivo, Juzgado Nacional [QM-ab] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/911023a1.html>
14 October 1993, Inta v. MCS Officina Meccanica, Cámera National [editorial remarks with relevant excerpts] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/931014a1.html>
6 October 1994, Bermatex S.r.l v. Valentin Rius, Juzgado Nacional [QM-dk/st] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941006a1.html>
31 October 1995, Bedial S.A. v. Paul Müggenburg GmbH, Cámara Nacional [QM-dk/st] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951031a1.html>
24 April 2000 Cámera Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Comercial [QM-jbl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000424a1.html>
* 21 July 2002 C�mara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Comercial [QM-jo/prm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020721a1.html>
2 July 2003 Juzgado Comercial [QM-Guillaume] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030702a1.html>
31 May 2007 Cámera Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Comercial [QM-lgmm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070531a1.html>

AUSTRALIA

12 March 1992, Renard v. Minister, New South Wales Court of Appeal [editorial remarks with relevant excerpt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/920312a2.html>
28 April 1995, Roder v. Rosedown, Adelaide Federal District Court <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950428a2.html>
17 November 2000, Downs Investments v. Perwaja Steel, Supreme Court of Queensland <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001117a2.html>
1 February 2001, Perry Engineering v. Bernold, Supreme Court of South Australia <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010201a2.html>
12 October 2001, Downs Investment v Perwaja Steel, Supreme Court of Queensland, Court of Appeal <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011012a2.html>
17 January 2003, Ginza Pte v Vista Corp., Supreme Court of Western Australia <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030117a2.html>
24 April 2003, Playcorp Pty Ltd v Taiyo Kogyo Ltd, Supreme Court of Victoria <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030424a2.html>
27 May 2004, Summit Chemicals v Vetrotex Espana, Supreme Court of Western Australia � Court of Appeal <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040527a2.html>
13 October 2006 Italian Imported Foods Pty LKtd v Pucci S.r.l., Supreme Court of New South Wales <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061013a2.html>

AUSTRIA

20 February 1992 Bezirksgericht f�r Handelssachen <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/920220a3.html>
15 June 1994 Vienna Arbitration No. SCH-4318 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940615a4.html>
15 June 1994 Vienna Arbitration No. SCH-4366 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940615a3.html>
1 July 1994 Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940701a3.html>
27 October 1994 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941027a3.html>
10 November 1994 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-me/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941110a3.html>
9 November 1995 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951109a3.html>
6 February 1996 Oberster Gerichtshof <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960206a3.html>
11 February 1997 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970211a3.html>
20 March 1997 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970320a3.html>
24 April 1997 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970424a3.html>
18 June 1997 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-tk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970618a3.html>
11 September 1997 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-pf/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970911a3.html>
10 December 1997 Vienna Arbitration No. S 2/97 [QM-tk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971210a3.html>
12 February 1998 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-pf/rm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980212a3.html>
10 March 1998 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-vk/db] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980310a3.html>
11 March 1998 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-fa/vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980311a3.html>
30 June 1998 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-nc/db] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980630a3.html>
15 October 1998 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-me/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981015a3.html>
15 December 1998 Oberster Gerichsthof [QM-tk/vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981215a3.html
19 January 1999 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-vk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990119a3.html>
24 February 1999 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-vk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990224a3.html>
11 March 1999 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jw/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990311a3.html
19 May 1999 Oberster Gerichtshof [PK-BK] <http://www.cisg.at/9_1399ye.htm>
29 June 1999 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-pf/lf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990629a3.html>
28 July 1999 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-fa/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990311a3.html>
27 August 1999 Oberster Gerichtshof [pk-bk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990827a3.html>
9 March 2000 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-mm/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000309a3.html>
21 March 2000 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-vk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000321a3.html
13 April 2000 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-en] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000413a3.html>
28 April 2000 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-rj/eo] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000428a3.html>
15 June 2000 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-vk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000615a3.html>
7 September 2000 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-fa/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000907a3.html>
28 September 2000 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-vk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000928a3.html>
24 January 2001 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010124a3.html>
5 July 2001 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010705a3.html>
13 September 2001 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010913a3.html>
22 October 2001 Oberster Gerichtshof, 1 Ob 49/01i [QM-rj/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011022a3.html>
22 October 2001 Oberster Gerichtshof, 1 Ob 77/01g [QM-rj/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011022a4.html>
14 January 2002 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-tf/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020114a3.html>
24 January 2002 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-vk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020124a3.html>
7 March 2002 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-vk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020307a3.html>
17 April 2002 Oberster Gerichtshof [7 Ob 54/02w] [QM-vk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020417a3.html>
17 April 2002 Oberster Gerichtshof [7 Ob 57/02m] QM-vk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020417a4.html>
26 April 2002 Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck [QM-ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020426a3.html>
31 May 2002 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020531a3.html>
16 September 2002 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020916a3.html>
18 December 2002 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021218a3.html>
27 February 2003 Oberster Gerichtshof [AB-bk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030227a3.html>
17 December 2003 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-vk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031217a3.html>
21 April 2004 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040421a3.html>
29 July 2004 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040729a3.html>
14 December 2004 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-df/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041214a3.html>
26 January 2005 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-vk-cba] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050126a3.html>
1 February 2005 Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050201a3.html>
* 2 February 2005 Landesgericht Salzburg [QM-jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050202a3.html>
* 23 March 2005 Oberlandesgericht Linz [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050323a3.html>
13 May 2005 Landgericht Freiburg [QM-sd] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050513g1.html>
* 26 April 2005 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050426a3.html>
23 May 2005 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-sk/sh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050523a3.html>
24 May 2005 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-df/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050524a3.html>
1 June 2005 Oberlandesgericht Linz [QM-sd/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050601a3.html>
21 June 2005 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050621a3.html>
8 August 2005 Oberlandesgericht Linz [QM-sd/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050808a3.html>
31 August 2005 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-tf/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050831a3.html>
8 November 2005 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jh/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051108a3.html>
29 November 2005 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-ta/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051129a3.html>
23 January 2006 Oberlandesgericht Linz [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060123a3.html>
25 January 2006 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060125a3.html>
12 September 2006 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060912a3.html>
30 November 2006 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061130a3.html>
19 April 2007 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-vk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070419a3.html>
4 July 2007 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070704a3.html>
24 September 2007 Oberlandesgericht Linz [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070924a3.html>
19 December 2007 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071219a3.html>

BELARUS

5 October 1995, ATT v. Arco, Belarusian Chamber of Commerce and Industry International Court of Arbitration Case No. 24/13-29 [QM-ts] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951005b5.html>

BELGIUM

* 13 November 1992, Maglificio Dalmine S.r.l. v. S.C. Covires, Tribunal commercial de Bruxelles [QM-ah] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/921113b1.html>
* 5 October 1994 Tribunal commercial de Bruxelles [QM-dk/kkk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941005b1.html>
19 September 1995, Gantry v. Research Consulting Marketing, Tribunal de commerce Nivelles [QM-cs/tk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950919b1.html>
* 18 June 1996 Hof van Beroep Antwerpen [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960618b1.html>
* 6 October 1997, Wonderfil v. Depraetere Industries, Rechtbank van Koophandel Kortrijk [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971006b1.html>
* 7 April 1998 Hof van Beroep Antwerp [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980407b1.html>
* 4 November 1998 Hof van Beroep Antwerpen [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981104b1.html>
* 18 May 1999 Hof van Beroep Antwerp (Vandermaesen Viswaren v. Euromar Seafood) [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990518b1.html>
26 April 2000, B.V.B.A. J.P. v. s. Ltd, Hof van Beroep Gent [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000426b1.html>
29 January 2001 Rechtbank van Koophandel Ieper [QM-tm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010129b1.html>
* 8 March 2001 Cour d�appel Mons [QM-kkk/lm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010308b1.html>
25 April 2001, BV BA G-2 v. AS C.B., Rechtbank van Koophandel Veurne [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010425b1.html>
23 May 2001, H.T. GmbH v. N.V. R., Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010523b1.html>
27 June 2001 S.r.l. R.C. v. BV BA R.T., Hof van Beroep Antwerpen [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010627b1.html>
15 January 2002 Tribunal de Commerce Namur [QM-cs/tk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020115b1.html>
18 January 2002 Rechtbank van Koophandel Mechelen [QM-tm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020118b1.html>
* 14 February 2002 Hof van Beroep Antwerp (NV Carta Mundi v. Index Syndicate Ltd.) [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020214b1.html>
6 March 2002, Zapatos Mediterraneos v. Shoe Bizz, Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-vn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020306b1.html>
6 March 2002, Roelants Eurosprint v. Beltronic, Rechtbank van Koophandel Hattelt [QM-vn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020306b2.html>
15 May 2002, NV A.R. v. NV I., Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-bs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020515b1.html>
22 May 2002, R. B.V. NV v. J.V. B.V., Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-bs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020522b1.html>
* 16 December 2002 Hof van Beroep Antwerpen [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021216b1.html>
* 28 April 2003 Cour d'appel Liège [QM-jh/lm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030428b1.html>
6 January 2004 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-yw/tk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040106b1.html>
27 January 2004 Cour d'appel Liège [QM-lm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040127b1.html>
28 January 2004 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-yw/tk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040128b1.html>
4 February 2004 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-dk/yw] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040204b1.html>
25 February 2004 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-ev/tk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040225b1.html>
25 February 2004 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-ev/tk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040225b2.html>
24 March 2004 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-dk/yw] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040324b1.html>
* 14 April 2004 Hof van Beroep Antwerp (Cooling installation sensors case) [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040414b1.html>
* 10 May 2004 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-tt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040510b1.html>
* 4 June 2004 Rechtbank van Koophandel Kortrijk [QM-vm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040604b1.html>
* 30 June 2004 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040630b1.html>
* 4 October 2004 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041004b1.html>
* 20 October 2004 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-tt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041020b1.html>
* 8 November 2004 Hof van Bereop Ghent [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041108b1.html>
24 November 2004 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-vm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041124b1.html>
* 3 January 2005 Hof van Beroep Antwerp [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050103b1.html>
25 January 2005 Rechtbank van Koophandel Tongeren [QM-tt/kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/050125b1.html>
* 31 January 2005 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050131b1.html>
* 20 September 2005 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050920b1.html>
* 15 February 2006 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060215b1.html>
* 19 April 2006 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060419b1.html>
* 24 April 2006 Hof van Beroep Antwerpen [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060424b1.html>
* 10 May 2006 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060510b1.html>
* 22 January 2007 Hof van Beroep Antwerp (N.V. Secremo v. Helmut Papst) [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070122b1.html>
* 22 January 2007 Hof van Beroep Antwerp (BVBA I.T.M v. S.A. Montanier) [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070122b2.html>
* 16 April 2007 Hof van Beroep Antwerp [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070416b1.html>

BULGARIA

24 January 1994 Arbitration Case 39/93 [QM-bb/vv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940124bu.html>
24 April 1996 Arbitration Case 56/1995 [QM-bb/vv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960424bu.html>
* 29 September 1997 Arbitration Case 71-94 [QM-bb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970929bu.html>
* 2 February 1998 Arbitration Case 20/97 [QM-bb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980202bu.html>
12 February 1998 Arbitration Case 11/1996 [QM-bb/vv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980212bu.html>
* 16 February 1998 Arbitration Case 59/1995 [QM-bb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980216bu.html>
* 30 November 1998 Arbitration Case 14/98 [QM-bb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981130bu.html>
24 July 2000 Arbitration Case 36/99 [QM-bb/vv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000724bu.html>
12 March 2001 Arbitration Case 33/98 [QM-bb/vv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010312bu.html>
19 March 2001 Arbitration Case 26/00 [QM-bb/vv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010319bu.html>
* 12 June 2001 Arbitration Case 41/00 [QM-bb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010612bu.html>
* 28 February 2002 Arbitration Case 26/99 [QM-bb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020228bu.html>

CANADA

16 December 1998, Nova Tool v. London Industrues, Ontario Court, General Division <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981216c4.html>
31 August 1999, San Guiseppe v. Forti Moulding, Ontario Superior Court of Justice <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990831c4.html>
20 September 2002, Brown & Root v. Aerotech, Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020920c4.html>
21 August 2003, Mansonville v. Kurtz, Supreme Court, British Columbia <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030821c4.html>
6 October 2003, Diversitel v. Glacier, Ontario Supreme Court of Justice <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031006c4.html>
14 November 2003, Shane v. JCB Belgium, Ontario Superior Court of Justice <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031114c4.html>
4 January 2004, Shane v. JCB Belgium, Ontario Superior Court of Justice <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040104c4.html>
4 May 2004, Brown & Root v. Aerotech, Court of Appeal of Manitoba <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040504c4.html>
28 October 2005, Chateau des Charmes Ltd v. Sabaté USA Inc. et al., Ontario Superior Court of Justice <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051028c4.html>

CHINA

* 4 August 1988 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/880804c1.html>
1989 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CIETAC] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/890000c1.html>
13 June 1989 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/890613c1.html>
Post-1989 CIETAC Arbitration Award, Contract #QFD890011 [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/900000c1.html>
* 18 April 1991 CIETAC Arbitration Award - Shenzhen [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/910418c1.html>`
* 19 April 1991 CIETAC Arbitration Award - Shenzhen [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/910419c1.html>
6 June 1991 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-wh/lh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/910606c1.html>
30 October 1991 CIETAC Arbitration Award <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/911030c1.html>
16 December 1991 CIETAC Arbitration Award [Case 79] [QM-bz]
16 December 1991 CIETAC Arbitration Award [Case 80] [CISG/1991/05] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/911216c1.html>
Post-1992 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CIETAC] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930000c2.html>
9 January 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/03] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930109c1.html
20 January 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/04] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930120c1.html>
25 February 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/05] [QM-cg/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930225c1.html>
27 February 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/01] [M. Will] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930227c1.html>
* 26 March 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/06] [QM-xp/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930326c1.html>
30 March 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/07] [QM-yt/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930330c1.html>
1 April 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [Link to Unilex case translation] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930401c1.html>
* 20 April 1993 Xiamen Intermediate People's Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930420c1.html>
5 July 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/08] [NYU-tl/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930705c1.html>
10 July 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/09] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930710c1.html>
20 July 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/10] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930720c1.html>
7 August 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/11] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930807c1.html>
26 October 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/12] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/931026c1.html>
20 December 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/13] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/931220c1.html>
20 January 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/02] [NYU-fw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940120c1.html>
20 February 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/03] [CIETAC] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940220c1.html>
30 March 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/04] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940330c1.html>
6 April 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/05] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940406c1.html>
11 April 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/06] [QM-qy/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940411c1.html>
10 May 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/07] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940510c1.html>
17 June 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/08] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940617c1.html>
11 August 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/09] [QM-zh/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940811c1.html>
5 September 1944 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/10] [QM-cg/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940905c2.html>
19 September 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/11] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940919c1.html>
29 September 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/12] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940929c1.html>
25 October 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/13] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941025c1.html>
* December 1994 Fujian Higher Peoples Court [QM-wd] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941200c1.html>
12 December 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/14] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941212c1.html>
28 December 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/15] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941228c1.html>
4 January 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/02] [QM-cg/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950104c1.html>
23 February 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-fy-hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950223c1.html>
10 March 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/03] [QM-ws/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950310c2.html>
10 March 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/04] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950310c1.html>
22 March 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-kz/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950322c1.html>
18 April 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/06] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950418c1.html>
23 April 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/07] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950423c1.html>
28 April 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/08] [QM-cw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950428c1.html>
* 15 May 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/09] [NYU-jw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950515c1.html>
16 May 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/10] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950516c1.html>
5 August 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/11] [QM-ws/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950805c1.html>
* 18 September 1995 Chansha Intermediate People's Court [QM-wd] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950918c1.html>
15 December 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/12] [Sweet & Maxwell] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951215c1.html>
12 January l996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/03] [QM-mx/ll] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960112c1.html>
22 January 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/04] [QM-mx/ll] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960122c1.html>
30 January 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/05] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960130c1.html>
5 February 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/06][QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960205c1.html>
5 February 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/07] [QM-mx/ll] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960205c2.html>
12 February 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/08] [QM-mx/ll] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960212c1.html>
14 February 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/09] [QM-mx/ll] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960214c1.html>
15 February 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/10] [QM-yx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960215c1.html>
27 February 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960227c1.html>
8 March 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/12] [QM-zx/hy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960308c1.html>
8 March 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/13] [QM-mx/ll] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960308c2.html>
14 March 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/14] [QM-cw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960314c1.html>
29 March 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/15] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960329c1.html>
29 March 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/16] [QM-yt/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960329c2.html>
3 April 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/17] [NYU-jw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960403c1.html>
4 April 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/18] [NYU-kf/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960404c1.html>
17 April 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/19] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960417c1.html>
30 April 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960430c1.html>
2 May 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [1996/CISG/21] [QM-zx/hy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960502c1.html>
10 May 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/22] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960510c1.html>
14 May 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960514c1.html>
* 16 May 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/24] [QM-mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960516c1.html>
22 May 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/25] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960522c1.html>
29 May 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/26] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960529c1.html>
31 May 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/27] [NYU-kf/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960531c1.html>
12 July 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/28] [QM-zx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960712c1.html>
12 July 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/29] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960712c3.html>
12 July 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/30] [QM-gy/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960712c2.html>
16 July 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-kz/hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960716c1.html>
30 July 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/32] [QM-mx/lp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960730c1.html>
30 July 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/33] [QM-mx/lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960730c2.html>
31 July 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/34] [QM-mx/lk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960731c1.html>
6 August 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/35] [QM-cg/jc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960806c1.html>
8 August 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/36] [QM-gy/zc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960808c1.html>
9 August 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/37] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960809c2.html>
9 August 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/38] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960809c1.html>
16 August 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/39] [QM-gy/lp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960816c1.html>
30 August 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/40] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960830c1.html>
* 4 September 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [1996/CISG/41] [QM-zx/fz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960904c1.html>
6 September 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/42] [QM-mx/lk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960906c1.html>
18 September 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/01] [QM-yx/cj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960918c1.html>
18 September 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/43] [NYU-kf/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960918c2.html>
28 September 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/44] [QM-nz/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960928c1.html>
10 October 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/45] [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961010c1.html>
15 October 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/46] [QM-mx/lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961015c1.html>
17 October 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/47] [NYU-bh/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961017c1.html>
23 October 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/48] [NYU-jw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961023c1.html>
26 October 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/49] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961026c1.html>
7 November 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/50] [NYU-jw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961107c1.html>
11 November 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/51] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961111c1.html>
* 15 November 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/52] [QM-mx/fz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961115c1.html>
18 November 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/53] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961118c1.html>
25 November 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961125c1.html>
28 November 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/54] [QM-zc/wxy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961128c1.html>
17 December 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/55] [QM-mx/lk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961217c1.html>
18 December 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/56] [QM-cg/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961218c1.html>
23 December 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/57] [QM-nz/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961223c1.html>
31 December 1996 Fujian Higher People's Court [QM-mx-cj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961231c1.html>
31 December 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/58] [QM-zt/gy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961231c2.html>
1997 Shanghai Higher Peoples Court [QM-wd/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970000c1.html>
6 February 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-jc/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970206c1.html>
6 March 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970306c1.html>
1 April 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/02] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970401c1.html>
2 April 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/03] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970402c1.html>
4 April 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/04] [QM-zc/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970404c1.html>
11 April 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [1997/CISG/05] [QM-nz/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970411c1.html>
15 April 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/06] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970415c1.html>
23 April 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/07] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970423c1.html>
23 April 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/08] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970423c2.html>
24 April 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/09] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970424c1.html>
30 April 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/10] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970430c1.html>
7 May 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/11] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970507c2.html>
7 May 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/12] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970507c1.html>
22 May 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/13] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970522c1.html>
2 June 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/14] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970602c1.html>
16 June 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/15] [NYU-fw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970616c1.html>
25 June 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/16] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970625c1.html>
26 June 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/17] [NYU-tl/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970626c1.html>
27 June 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/18] [QM-mx/lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970627c1.html>
4 July 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/19] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970704c1.html>
7 July 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/20] [NYU-jw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970707c1.html>
10 July 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/21] [QM-zc/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970710c1.html>
21 July 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/22] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970721c1.html>
23 July 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/23] [QM-yt/lk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970723c1.html>
31 July 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970731c1.html>
5 August 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/25] [QM-bh/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970805c1.html>
18 August 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/26] [QM-lp/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970818c1.html>
8 September 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [1997/CISG/27] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970908c1.html>
10 September 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/39] [Sweet & Maxwell] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970910c1.html>
29 September 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/28] [NYU-kf/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970929c1.html>
8 October 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/29] [QM-zt/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971008c1.html>
13 October 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/30] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971013c1.html>
27 October 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971027c1.html>
20 November 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/32] [QM-mx/lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971120c1.html>
30 November 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/33] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971130c1.html>
15 December 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/34] [QM-zc/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971215c1.html>
16 December 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/35] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971216c1.html>
19 December 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/36] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971219c1.html>
31 December 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/37] [QM-an/mx] http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971231c1.html>
20 January 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980120c1.html>
22 January 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mp/an] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980122c1.html>
* 23 January 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980123c1.html>
24 March 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-qz/hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980324c1.html>
22 June 1998 Shanghai Second Intermediate People's Court [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980622c1.html>
30 July 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980730c1.html>
25 September 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1998/12] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980925c1.html>
26 November 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1998/06] [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981126c1.html>
26 November 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1998/07] [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981126c2.html>
30 November 1998 CIETAC award [CISG/1998/08] [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981130c1.html>
15 December 1998 CIETAC award [CISG/1998/09] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981215c1.html>
24 December 1998 CIETAC award [CISG/1998/05] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981224c1.html>
25 December 1998 CIETAC award [CISG/1998/10] [QM-zc/mx] http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981225c2.html>
* 25 December 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1998/11] [QM-lp/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981225c1.html>
1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/01] [QM-jx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990000c1.html>
* 6 January 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/04] [QM-ws/xw] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990106c1.html>
13 January 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/05] [QM-zc/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990113c1.html>
28 January 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/06] [NYU-tl/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990128c1.html>
3 February 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/07] [QM-mx/lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990203c1.html>
12 February 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/08] [QM-lp/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990212c1.html>
12 February 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/09] [QM-zc/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990212c2.html>
25 February 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/10] [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990225c2.html>
25 February 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/11] [QM-lz/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990225c1.html>
* 1 March 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [1999/CISG/12] [QM-nz/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990301c1.html>
* 25 March 1999 CIETAC award [CISG/1999/13] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990325c1.html>
29 March 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/14] [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990329c1.html>
30 March 1999 CIETAC award [CISG/1999/15] [QM-jw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990330c3.html>
30 March 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/16] [QM-cm/xy] http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990330c2.html>
30 March 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/17] [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990330c1.html>
2 April 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/18] [QM-mx/lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990402c1.html>
5 April 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/19] [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990405c1.html>
7 April 1999 CIETAC award [CISG/1999/20] [QM-fw/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990407c1.html>
* 8 April 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/21] [QM-ws/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990408c1.html>
12 April 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/22] [QM-an/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990412c1.html>
20 April 1999 CIETAC award [CISG/1999/23] [NYU-tl/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990420c1.html>
* 20 May 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/25] [QM-lz/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990520c1.html>
20 May 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/24] [QM-lz/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990520c2.html>
21 May 1999 CIETAC award [CISG/1999/26] [QM-zx/lp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990521ci.html>
28 May 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/jc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990528c1.html>
31 May 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-ws/lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990531c1.html>
June 1999 PR China Arbitration Award [QM-yx/lp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990600c1.html>
4 June 1999 CIETAC award [CISG/1999/28] [QM-zx/lp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990604c1.html>
11 June 1999 CIETAC award [CISG/1999/29] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990611c1.html>
* 30 June 1999 CIETAC award [CISG/1999/31] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990630c2.html>
30 June 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/30] [QM-mx/lp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990630c1.html>
* 20 July 1999 Supreme Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990720c1.html>
10 August 1999 CIETAC arbitration award [CISG 1999/35] [QM-zx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990810c1.html>
17 December 1999 Rizho Intermediate People's Court [QM-wd/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991217c1.html>
29 December 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/33] [QM-yt/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991229c1.html>
31 December 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/gh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991231c1.html>
2000 CIETAC Arbitration award [CISG/2000/17] [QM-zx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000000c1.html>
7 January 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-an/hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000107c1.html>
11 January 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-ws/lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000111c1.html>
19 January 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-an/hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000119c1.html>
* 30 January 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000130c1.html>
31 January 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/2000/09] [QM-mx/hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000131c1.html>
1 February 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/lp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000201c1.html>
11 February 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-xy/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000211c1.html>
31 March 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000331c1.html>
27 April 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000427c1.html>
23 May 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000523c1.html>
17 July 2000 Higher People's Court of He'nan Province [QM-gx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000717c1.html>
27 July 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/jc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000727c1.html>
* 8 August 2000 Supreme Court [QM-zx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000808c1.html>
10 August 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/jc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000810c1.html>
29 September 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/2000/15] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000929c1.html>
6 November 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001106c1.html>
6 December 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001206c1.html>
7 December 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001207c1.html>
* 11 January 2001 Supreme Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010111c1.html>
* 19 February 2001 Jiangsu Higher People's Court [QM-wd] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010219c1.html>
22 March 2001 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010322c1.html>
* 4 April 2001 Wuhan Intermediate People's Court [QM-mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010404c1.html>
* 18 July 2001 Zhejiang Cixi People�s Court [QM-wd] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010718c1.html>
12 October 2001 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011021c1.html>
* 28 November 2001 Jiangsu Higher People's Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011128c1.html>
25 December 2001 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011225c1.html>
2002 Shanghai Yangpu District People's Court [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020000c1.html>
* 2002 Wuhan Intermediate People's Court [QM-mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020001c1.html>
4 February 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020204c1.html>
4 February 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-ff/cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020204c2.html>
* 5 March 2002 Beihai Maritime Court, Guangzi Zhuang Autonomous Region [QM-wd] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020305c1.html>
7 March 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-gj/lp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020307c1.html>
10 June 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/jc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020610c1.html>
12 July 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-NYU/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020712c1.html>
15 July 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-NYU/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020715c1.html>
16 July 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/2002/06] [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020716c1.html>
* 18 July 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-NYU/jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020718c1.html>
* 23 July 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020723c1.html>
26 July 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020726c1.html>
9 August 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/2002/21] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020809c1.html>
9 September 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020909c1.html>
10 September 2002 Wuhan Maritime Court [QM-zx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020910c1.html>
13 September 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award[QM-zx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020913c1.html>
18 September 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-NYU/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020918c1.html>
23 September 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020923c1.html>
9 October 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021009c1.html>
10 October 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021010c1.html>
21 October 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021021c1.html>
25 October 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021025c1.html>
4 November 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021104c1.html>
6 November 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021106c1.html>
8 November 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021108c1.html>
11 November 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021111c1.html>
* 27 November 2002 Higher People's Court of Ningxia Hui Automonous Region [QM-wd] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021127c1.html>
29 November 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021129c1.html>
17 December 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021217c1.html>
18 December 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021218c1.html>
23 December 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021223c1.html>
* 25 December 2002 Higher People's Court of Jiangsu Province [QM-mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021225c1.html>
* 27 December 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-NYU-xl/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021227c1.html>
30 December 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021230c1.html>
19 January 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030119c1.html>
17 February 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030217c1.html>
12 April 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030412c1.html>
* 18 April 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [English text] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030418c1.html>
3 June 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030603c1.html>
19 June 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030619c1.html>
26 June 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030626c1.html>
7 July 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/2003/18] [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030707c1.html>
8 July 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030708c1.html>
23 July 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030723c1.html>
17 September 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030917c1.html>
6 October 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031006c1.html>
6 November 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031106c1.html>
3 December 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031203c1.html>
10 December 2003 CIETAC Arbitation Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031210c1.html>
18 December 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031218c1.html>
31 December 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031231c1.html>
14 January 2004 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040114c1.html>
12 March 2004 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/2004/04] [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040312c1.html>
23 March 2004 Shanghai Intermediate People's Court [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040323c1.html>
9 April 2004 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040409c1.html>
* 11 May 2004 Wuhan Intermediate People's Court [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040511c1.html>
11 July 2004 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/2004/03] [QM-lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040713c1.html>
10 September 2004 Higher People's Court of Shandong Province [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040910c1.html>
29 September 2004 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040929c1.html>
10 October 2004 Higher People's Court of Guandong Province [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041010c1.html>
* 14 December 2004 Xiamen Intermediate People's Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041214c1.html>
* 11 January 2005 Guangdong Province Higher Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050111c1.html>
28 February 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-Stephen/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050228c1.html>
7 April 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/xy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050407c1.html>
10 May 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-fy/hy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050510c1.html>
27 June 2005 Higher People's Court of Shadong Province [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050627c1.html>
* 29 June 2005 Shanghai Intermediate People's Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050629c2.html>
* 30 August 2005 Shanghai Higher People's Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050830c1.html>
* 21 September 2005 Supreme Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050921c1.html>
* 23 September 2005 New Pudong District People's Court of Shanghai [QM-zx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050923c1.html>
21 October 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-xw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051021c1.html>
9 November 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051109c1.html>
* 19 November 2005 Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051119c1.html>
* 28 November 2005 Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051128c1.html>
7 December 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051207c1.html>
21 May 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060521c1.html>
20 September 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060920c1.html>

COLOMBIA

6 May 2000 Corte Contitucional [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000510c7.html>

DENMARK

22 January 1996 Østre Landsret København [CISG-Denmark website] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960122d1.html>
* 4 November 1998 Randers Byret [QM-tn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981104d1.html>
10 November 1999 Vestre Landsret [CISG-Denmark website] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991110d1.html>
15 February 2001 Supreme Court [CISG-Denmark website] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010215d1.html>
31 January 2002 Maritime Commercial Court [CISG-Denmark website] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020131d1.html>

EGYPT

13 April 1991 Arbitration Award (Cairo Chamber of Commerce & Industry) [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/910413e1.html>
3 October 1995 Arbitration Award (Cairo Chamber of Commerce & Industry) [Link to Unilex case presentation (English translation)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951003e1.html>

ESTONIA

19 February 2004 Tallinn Circuit Court [CISG-online.ch] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040219e3.html>

FINLAND

5 November 1996 District Court of Kuopio [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961105f5.html>
17 January 1997 Tampere Court of First Instance [QM-jv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970117f5.html>
18 February 1997 Turku Court of Appeal <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970218f5.html>
12 November 1997 Turku Court of Appeal [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971112f5.html>
29 January 1998 Helsinki Court of Appeal [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980129f5.html>
30 June 1998 Helsinki Court of Appeal [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980630f5.html>
26 October 2000 Helsinki Court of Appeal [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001026f5.html>
12 April 2002 Turku Court of Appeal [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020412f5.html>

FRANCE

16 June 1993, Ytong v. Lasaosa, Cour d'appel Grenoble <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930616f1.html>
4 January 1995, Fauba v. Fujitsu, Cour de Cassation <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950104f1.html>
22 February 1995, "BRI Production "Bonaventure" v. Pan African Export, Cour d'appel Grenoble <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950222f1.html>
* 29 March 1995, Cámara Agraria v. André Margaron, Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM-cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950329f1.html>
6 April 1995, Thyssen v. Maaden, Cour d'appel Paris [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950406f1.html>
19 April 1995, Hughes Electronic v. Souriau Cluses, Cour d'appel Versailles [QM-cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950419f1.html>
* 26 April 1995, Enterprise Alain Veyron v. Ambrosio, Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM-cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950426f1.html>
* 26 April 1995, Marques Roque Joachim v. La Sarl Holding Manin Rivière, Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM-cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950426f2.html>
13 September 1995, Caiato v. S.F.F., Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950913f1.html>
* 13 December 1995, ISEA Industrie v. Lu, Cour d'appel Paris [QM-cs/es] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951213f1.html>
* 23 January 1996, Sacovini v. Les fils de Henri Ramel, Cour de Cassation [QM-cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960123f1.html>
15 May 1996, Thermo King v. Cigna Insurance, Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM-cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960515f1.html>
23 October 1996, Scea. Gaec. Des Beauches B. Brino v. Teso Ten Elsen, Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM-kk/to-ks] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961023f1.html>
* 21 November 1996, Schreiber v. Thermo Dynamique, Cour d'appel Aix-en-Provence [translation with <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990526f1.html>]
17 December 1996, Ceramique Culinaire v. Musgrave, Cour de Cassation [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961217f1.html>
* 2 December 1997, Mode jeune diffusion v. Maglificio, Cour de Cassation [QM-cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971202f1.html>
* 18 December 1997, Romay v. Behr France, Tribunal de grande instance Colmar [QM-cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971218f1.html>
14 January 1998 Cour d'appel Paris [QM-ac] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/890114f1.html>
* 19 January 1998, Flippe Christian v. Douet Sport Collections, Tribunal de commerce Besançon [QM-cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980119f1.html>
27 January 1998, Hughes v. Société Technocontact, Cour de Cassation [QM-kk/to-ks] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980127f1.html>
29 January 1998, Giustina International v. Perfect Circle Europe, Cour d'appel Versailles [QM-cs/to-ks] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980129f1.html>
* 4 March 1998, Laborall v. Matis, Cour d'appel Paris [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980304f1.html>
* 18 March 1998, Sté Franco-africaine de distribution textile v. More Textilfabrik, Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980318f1.html>
16 July 1998, Les Verreries de Saint Gobain v. Martinswerk, Cour de Cassation <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980716f1.html>
* 5 January 1999, Thermo King v. Cigna Insurance, Cour de Cassation [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990105f1.html>
4 February 1999, Ego Fruits v. La Verja Begastri, Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990204f1.html>
26 May 1999, Schreiber v. Thermo Dynamique, Cour de Cassation <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990526f1.html>
* 21 October 1999, Calzados Magnanni v. Shoes General International, Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM-k] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991021f1.html>
* 17 February 2000 Cour d�appel Rouen [QM-dk/kkk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000217f1.html>
12 October 2000 Cour d'appel Paris [QM-rs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001012f1.html>
* 24 October 2000, SARL Pelliculest v. Morton International, Cour d'appel Colmar [QM-k] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001024f1.html>
* 29 March 2001, TCE Diffusion v. Elettrotecnica Ricci, Cour d'appel Orleans [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010329f1.html>
12 June 2001 Cour d�appel Colmar [QM-sl/jh] <