CISG CASE PRESENTATION

Netherlands 31 March 2010 Rechtbank Rotterdam (Fish case)
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100331n1.html]

Case Table of Contents

• Case identification
• Classification of issues present
• Editorial remarks
• Citations to case abstracts, texts, and commentaries

• Guide to links contained in case presentations

Case identification

DATE OF DECISION: 20100331 (31 March 2010)

JURISDICTION: Netherlands

TRIBUNAL: Rechtbank Rotterdam

JUDGE(S): Unavailable

CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: Unavailable

CASE NAME: Unavailable

CASE HISTORY: Unavailable

SELLER'S COUNTRY: Netherlands (Defendant)

BUYER'S COUNTRY: France (Plaintiff)

GOODS INVOLVED: Fish and fish products

Classification of issues present

APPLICATION OF CISG: Yes

APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES

Key CISG provisions at issue: Articles 7 ; 8 ; 9 ; 18 ; 35 ; 38

Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code numbers:

7C [Gap-filling];

8B [Interpretation based on objective standards];

9C ; 9D [Practices established by the parties ; Usages and practices: impact on provisions of Convention];

18A3 [Silence or inactivity insufficient];

35A [Quality, quantity and description required by contract];

38A ; 38B ; 38C [Buyer's obligation to examine goods ; When contract involves carriage of goods, postponement until after arrival at destination ; Deferral of examination in case of redirection or redispatch]

Descriptors: Unavailable

Editorial remarks

• Unavailable

Citations to case abstracts, texts, and commentaries

CITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION

(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable

(b) Other abstracts

Unavailable

CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION

Original language (Dutch): Unavailable

Translation: Unavailable

CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION

Unavailable