Go to Database Directory || Go to CISG Table of Contents || Go to Case Search Form || Go to Bibliography


Austria 20 February 1992 District Court for Commercial Matters Vienna (Shoes case) [translation available (excerpt)]
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/920220a3.html]

Primary source(s) for case presentation: Michael R. Will; Unilex abstract; case commentary

Case Table of Contents

Case identification

DATE OF DECISION: 19920220 (20 February 1992)


TRIBUNAL: BG-H Wien (Vienna) [BG-H = Bezirksgericht für Handelssachen = District Court for Commercial Matters]

JUDGE(S): Unavailable


CASE NAME: Austrian case citations do not generally identify parties to proceedings

CASE HISTORY: Unavailable

SELLER'S COUNTRY: Italy (plaintiff)

BUYER'S COUNTRY: Austria (defendant)


Classification of issues present



Key CISG provisions at issue: Article 1(1)(b) [Also cited: Article 1(1)(a) ]

Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code numbers:

1B2 [Basic rules of applicability: private international law points to Contracting State]

Descriptors: Applicability

Go to Case Table of Contents

Editorial remarks

EDITOR: Albert H. Kritzer

CISG issues ruled upon:

Applicability. The contract was between a seller from Italy and a buyer from Austria. It was concluded at a time when the CISG was in effect in Italy but not in Austria. The court ruled that the CISG could not be applied pursuant to Article 1(1)(a). The court further stated:

"Article 1(1)(b) provides that the Convention is applicable to contracts of sale of goods between parties whose places of business are in different States when the rules of private international law lead to the application of the law of a Contracting State.

"Therefore, it must first be determined which substantive law ('law of the contract') is applicable under Sections 35 et seq. IPRG [Austrian Private International Law Act]. In this context, attention has to be paid to the fact that the Austrian IPRG employs the technique of reference to a foreign law in its totality (Section 5 IPRG). Thus a reference primarily aims at the rules of private international law of the country to which the IPRG refers; a reference back [renvoi] or a reference forward [to the law of a third country] is given effect (Section 5 IPRG). Such a chain of references by the rules of private international law has to be followed independently from the Vienna Convention, until a final reference to a specific national substantive law is found. Then, the only decisive issue is whether this country is a Contracting State of the Vienna Convention (see Karollus, UN-Kaufrecht, pp. 32 et seq.).

"Pursuant to Section 36 IPRG, bilateral contracts under which at least the preponderant part of one party's obligation is the payment of money are to be analyzed according to the law of the country in which the other party has his domicile or -- as in the present case -- his place of business.

"This would result in application of Italian private law and would make application of the Vienna Convention possible. However, Italy is a signatory of the Hague Convention Relating to the Law Applicable to the International Sale of Movable Goods 1955, which replaces -- within the bounds of its scope -- national conflicts laws. It makes contracts for the sale of movable tangible goods and contracts for the supply of goods to be manufactured or produced subject to the national law of the country in which the seller, at the time of receipt of the order, had his domicile or place of business. Absent an explicit agreement to the contrary, for the form and the time periods to be observed with respect to inspection of the goods, notice of lack of conformity, and the measures to be taken in case of rejection of the goods, the relevant law is the domestic law of the country in which, pursuant to the contract, the delivered movable goods were to be inspected. This constitutes, for these special issues, a reference back [renvoi] to Austrian substantive law which is relevant pursuant to Section 5(2) IPRG (see Potzmann, PZ pp. 262 et seq.).

"Since, in this case, it was precisely the question of a valid and timely notice of lack of conformity and the resulting claims for damages on the part of the seller which were in issue, an application of the Vienna Convention is entirely precluded due to the reference back to Austrian substantive law."

Go to Case Table of Contents

Citations to case abstracts, texts, and commentaries


(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable

(b) Other abstracts

English: Unilex database <http://www.unilex.info/case.cfm?pid=1&do=case&id=12&step=Abstract>

Italian: Diritto del Commercio Internazionale (1993) 654 No. 13


Original language (German): [österreichisches] Recht der Wirtschaft (öRdW) 1992, 239; Juristische Schulung (JuS) 1993, 378; Unilex database <http://www.unilex.info/case.cfm?pid=1&do=case&id=12&step=FullText>

Translation: Unavailable


English: Ferrari, International Legal Forum (4/1998) 138-225 [170 n.275 (renvoi in applying Art. 1(1)(b))]; Ferrari, International Contract Adviser (Vol. IV, No. 1) 1998, 33 [39]; Karollus, Cornell Review of the CISG (1995) 51 [56-57] [comments on basic rules of applicability in this and other cases]; Saf, 1999 thesis [reference to case at n.44 (renvoi issue)]

French: Witz, Les premières applications jurisprudentielles du droit uniforme de la vente internationale (L.G.D.J., Paris: 1995) 26-29

German: Karollus, Juristische Blätter (JBl) 1992, 26; [österreichisches] Recht der Wirtschaft (öRdW) 1994, 386 ; Piltz, Int. Kaufrecht (1993) 43 No. 92 = Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 1994, 1101 [1102 n.17]; Posch, Emptio-Venditio inter Nationes, Neumayer ed. (1997) 91 n. 11, 99-100; Staudinger-Magnus (1994) Art. 1 No. 102; Ferrari, Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht (1998) 162-172

Spanish: Piltz, La Ley (Buenos Aires), (5 September 1994) 1-4 n.13

Go to Case Table of Contents
Pace Law School Institute of International Commercial Law - Last updated July 30, 2002
Go to Database Directory || Go to CISG Table of Contents || Go to Case Search Form || Go to Bibliography