Russia 6 April 1994 Arbitration proceeding 224/1993
[Cite as: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940406r1.html]
Primary source(s) of information for case presentation: Michael R. Will
DATE OF DECISIONS:
JURISDICTION:
TRIBUNAL:
JUDGE(S):
CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: 224/1993
CASE NAME:
CASE HISTORY: Unavailable
SELLER'S COUNTRY: Unavailable
BUYER'S COUNTRY: United States (?)
GOODS INVOLVED: Unavailable
APPLICATION OF CISG: Yes
APPLICABLE CISG PROVISIONS AND ISSUES
Key CISG provisions at issues: Articles
Classification of issues using UNCITRAL classification code numbers:
Descriptors:
CITATIONS TO ABSTRACTS OF DECISION
(a) UNCITRAL abstract: Unavailable
(b) Other abstracts
Unavailable
CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION
Original language (Russian): Unavailable
Translation: Unavailable
CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION
English: Djakhongir Saidov Saidov, 7 Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law and Arbitration (1/2003) 1-62 at n.87 (As an example of the manner in which the Tribunal applied Article 8 of the CISG: "[O]ne of the issues in dispute was the currency in which payment ought to have been made. One of the factors influencing the decision that US dollars were the currency of payment was the conduct of the respondent. The [Tribunal] held that the fact that the respondent (who later changed the terms of the letter of credit) had initially opened the letter of credit in US dollars could serve as evidence that the respondent had based himself on US dollars being the currency of payment.")
Russian: Rozenberg, Kontrakt mezhdunarodnoj kupli-prodazhi. Sovremennaja praktika zaklijutchenija. Razreshenie sporov [International Sales Contracts], Mezhdunarodnyj centr finansovo-ekonomitcheskogo razvitija, Moscow [19961] 45, 55, 59-61; Rozenberg, Kontrakt [19962] 48, 58, 62-63; Rozenberg, Kontrakt [19983] 52, 60-61, 64-65; Boguslavskij, [1998] Mezhdunarodnoe tchastnoe provo [Private international law], Moscow [Jurist] 3d ed., 210
Go to Case Table of Contents