The CISG Translation Network

Over the last decade, the Institute of International Commercial Law has formed partnerships with academic institutions and individual scholars around the world to provide the legal community with high quality professional translations into English of foreign case law (including arbitral awards) relating to the CISG and UNIDROIT Principles (“The CISG Translation Network”). This organized effort has generated over 1,800 translations of CISG decisions and arbitral awards. The Network is overseen by Vikki Rogers, Director, Institute of International Commercial Law, Pace Law School (US), Dr Loukas Mistelis, Clive M Schmitthoff Professor of Transnational Commercial Law and Arbitration, Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary, University of London (UK), and Leandro Tripodi, Editor-in-chief of the CISG Brazil Website, International Law Officer, Moot Alumni Association (MAA) and member of the Brazilian Arbitration Committee (CBAr) and Doctoral candidate in International and Comparative Law in the University of São Paulo (Brazil).

To obtain permission to reproduce full translations for commercial or non-commercial use, please contact the IICL at <vrogers@law.pace.edu> or <jlonghitano@law.pace.edu>.

Institutional partners in the network include:

• Centre for Commercial Law Studies at Queen Mary, University of London (“Queen Mary Case Translation Programme”, the nominal description used for a transatlantic joint venture between the Institute of International Commercial Law at the Pace University School of Law)

• International Law Project ('ILP') (a partnership between the Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot's Moot Alumni Association ('MAA'), the Institute of International Law at Pace Law School and UNCITRAL). Further details in relation to the ILP can be obtained from the Moot Alumni Association's webpage at www.maa.net. Additionally, the MAA's International Law Officers, Luíza Kömel and Leandro Tripodi (based at São Paulo (Largo de São Francisco Faculty of Law)), can be contacted at ilp@maa.net

• New York University School of Law

• University of Belgrade

• University of Heidelberg

• Professor Tang Houzhi Case Translation Program

• We are also grateful to the members of our Autonomous CISG Network who regularly provide cases, recommend translators and edit case translations on our behalf.

Hundreds of individuals have also contributed their skill and time to make the translation program a success. The individuals are identified and given due credit on the case translation(s) that they completed on behalf of the Institute of International Commercial Law.

Should you wish to obtain further information or to join the pool of lawyers willing to translate cases occasionally or to share transcripts of interesting cases please do not hesitate to contact Vikki Rogers at <vrogers@law.pace.edu>, Loukas Mistelis at <L.Mistelis@qmul.ac.uk> or Leandro Tripodi <leandrocisg@gmail.com>.

Taming the Dragons of Uniform Law Case Law:
Sharing the reasoning of courts and arbitral tribunals

• Schedule of English case texts and translated case texts

["Taming the Dragons of Uniform Law" (title purloined from a scholar who coined it in another context) is a report on sharings of judicial reasoning in 1,885 English texts and English translations of court and arbitral awards on the UN Convention on Contracts for International Sale of Goods (CISG). "Dragon taming" is also an overture. We invite colleagues to serve our profession and the world trade community with us by collaborating on additional case translations.]

Calling attention to the need to consider foreign case law to "promote ... the uniform application of the CISG", Ferrari identifies uniform-law dragons. He states:

"[R]equiring interpreters to consider foreign decisions can create practical difficulties. On the one hand, foreign case law is not readily available, i.e., it cannot easily be retrieved. On the other hand, foreign case law is often written in a language unknown to the interpreter."[*]

[*] Franco Ferrari, "Applying the CISG in a Truly Uniform Manner, Uniform Law Review (2001-1) 206 [citations omitted].

To comply with the mandate recited in article 7(1) CISG, courts must have due regard to the "international character" of the CISG "and to the need to promote uniformity in its application," and scholars must be equipped to assist judges struggling to comprehend the ramifications and applications of this uniform international sales law. Schlechtriem reminds us of a corollary responsibility of scholars. He states:

A major help scholars can provide is by analyzing the cases of their countries and of other countries "as thoroughly as possible to present the full picture of interpretations and applications to our jurists."[*]

[*] Peter Schlechtriem, "Uniform Sales Law - The Experience with Uniform Sales Law in the Federal Republic of Germany", 3 Juridisk Tidskrift 1 (1991-92) 16 (emphasis added).

In collaboration with centers of learning of many countries <"http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/network.html">, we make CISG case law of all countries freely and readily available <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu> on the Internet. We provide:

• English texts of rulings of rulings on the CISG by courts of Australia, Canada, and the United States and texts of arbitral awards on our uniform law handed down in English by ICC and Stockholm Chamber of Commerce arbitral tribunals, and by arbitral tribunals of Switzerland;

• English translations of rulings on the CISG by courts of Argentina, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Iran, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Singapore, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Stockholm, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom and Vietnam, including rulings of the Supreme Courts of Argentina, Austria, Colombia, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Netherlands, Spain and Switzerland, and of arbitral interpretations of the CISG handed down by ICC tribunals and tribunals of Egypt, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Mexico, Russia, Sweden, Switzerland and Yugoslavia.

In ruling on an international convention, Lord Denning stated: We are told that there have been no decisions so far in other countries on this article of the convention ... So where we lead, others may follow. But I would like to assure them that if it had come first before them, we would be only too glad to follow them."[*]

[*]James Buchanan & Co Ltd v Babco Forwarding and Shipping (U.K.) Ltd [1977] 1 All ER 518 (CA) at 522, 524, [1977] 2 WRL 107 (CA) at 113, 113-14; reinforced by Fothergill v Monarch Airlines [1981] AC 252 (HL), [1980] All ER 696 (HL).

We also report compatible views of representatives of Latin American (Argentina), Scandinavian (Finland), United States, and German legal cultures, and of another English jurist. Representatives of many legal cultures favor consideration of decisions of courts of sister signatories. High courts, for example, the U.S. Supreme Court, urge us to give them "considerable weight".

• Antonio Boggiano and Lord Scarman state: "Uniform law requires ... a new common law" in which "[f]oreign precedents would not be precedents of a foreign law, but of uniform law";[*] "[c]ourts ... have to develop their jurisprudence in company with the courts of other countries ..." Lief Sevón states that a judge ought to be "obliged to search for and take into consideration foreign judgments ... at least the judgments from other Contracting States, when he is faced with a problem of interpretation of an international convention."[**]

• The U.S. Supreme Court, Boggiano, and Jürgen Schwarze state that "the opinions of our sister signatories [to an international convention] are to be entitled to considerable weight"; they are to be taken into account "in a comparative and critical manner"; with the "integrative force of a judgment ... based on the persuasive reasoning which the decisions of the Court bring to bear on the problem at hand."[***]

CISG article 7(1) is the law of every country that has adopted the UN Sales Convention; the comity -- comity is the keyword -- that article 7(1) calls for is to the same effect.

*Antonio Boggiano [Argentina], "The Experience of Latin American States, in: International Uniform Law in Practice / Le droit uniform international dans la pratique, Oceana: New York (1988) 47. ** Lord Scarman [England], [1980] 2 All E.R 696, 715; Lief Sevón [Finland], "Observations", in: International Uniform Law in Practice, op. cit. at 135. *** El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui Yuan Tseng, 525 U.S. 155, 176 (1999), quoting Air France v. Saks, 470 U.S. 392, 404 [1985] (defining the term "accident" as used in the Warsaw Convention); Boggiano, op. cit. at 47; Jürgen Schwarze [Germany], "The Role of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the Interpretation of Uniform Law among the Member States of the European Communities", in: International Law and Practice, op. cit. at 221.

There have been fine judicial implementations of the jurisconsultorium that CISG article 7(1) contemplates:

• Courts of Italy and Switzerland have taken the lead; see Tribunale di Cuneo 31 January 1996 and Obergericht Luzern 8 January 1997. United States, Spanish, German and French courts have followed suit; see Medical Marketing v. International Medico Scientifica, 17 May 1999; MCC-Marble v. Ceramica Nuova, 29 June 1998 (reference to the Internet by a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to ensure thorough research of case law from other jurisdictions); and Usinor Industeel v. Leeco Steel Products 28 March 2002 (citation of Australian case by U.S. Federal District Court); see also Audiencia Provincial de Valencia 7 June 2003, a Spanish ruling that cites Dutch, German and Swiss case law; Bundesgerichtshof 24 March 1999, a German Supreme Court ruling that cites CISG authorities from England, France, Switzerland and the United States, and Cour d'appel Grenoble 23 October 1996, a French case that quotes a German court decision.

• Referring to Medical Marketing, Schlechtriem states: "The U.S. federal court regards a foreign court decision as precedent, or at least as 'authority' and thus treats uniform international law similar to American law with the -- for American courts self-understood -- consideration given to decisions of neighboring states under the (American) common law. In other words, it treated the CISG as a kind of international common law, the application and development of which is in the hands of all nations party to the Convention, which courts must therefore also give consideration to decisions in other countries." Peter Schlechtriem [translated text of commentary], Praxis des International Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (1999) 791. The U.S. court's comity is reciprocated by the Landgericht [District Court] of Trier in an 8 January 2004 German court decision that cites Chateau des Charmes Wines v. Sabate USA, a 5 May 2003 U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision.

• An Italian court in Rheinland Versicherungen v. Atlarex S.r.l 12 July 2000 expands the comity that CISG article 7(1) contemplates. This is a ruling of the Tribunale di Vigevano in which the judge evaluates American, Austrian, Dutch, French, German, Italian and Swiss court rulings as well as arbitral awards in reasoning through the CISG issues he addresses, drawing on national reporters, texts and Internet websites for his case data. This court has, "more than any other court before it, taken into account the need to have regard to foreign case law in order to promote uniformity."[*] For more recent cases from Italy that follow this lead, see the 26 November 2002 ruling of the Tribunale di Rimini, the 25 February 2004 ruling of the Tribunali di Padova, the 31 March 2004 ruling of the Tribunali di Padova, the 11 January 2005 ruling of the Tribunale di Padova and the 16 February ruling of the Tribunale di Forli. See also Chicago Prime Packers v. Norham, a U.S. Federal District Court case handed down on 24 May 2004 that cites German, Italian and Dutch jurisprudence as well as U.S. case law on the CISG; Bundesgerichtshof 30 June 2004, a ruling of the German Supreme Court that cites court decisions of Canada and The Netherlands and arbitral rulings of the ICC and Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, as well as German case law on the CISG; and Hannaford v Australian Farmlink Pty Ltd, an Australian opinion handed down on 24 October 2008 that cites case law from France and Germany as well as scholarly commentaries. More recently, we have an Israeli Supreme Court opinion handed down on 17 March 2009 that cites case law from Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, Switzerland and the United States as well as scholarly commentaries from many countries.

  * Franco Ferrari, "Applying the CISG in a Truly Uniform Manner", Uniform Law Review (2001-1) 208.

This is encouraging.[*] To stimulate more such comity -- similar to the comity U.S. state courts traditionally accord UCC rulings by courts of sister U.S. states -- jurists of all countries should consider decisions handed down in sister jurisdictions.

Can there be such a concept as ipso facto stare decisis? Henschel has coined this concept. He cites the 5 March 1998 "New Zealand mussels" ruling of the Federal Supreme Court of Germany in that context, calling attention to acceptance of its ratio decidendi in Austria and the United States. He cites the Medical Marketing ruling of the U.S. District Court, E.D. of Lousiana, 17 May 1999 and a 13 April 2000 ruling of the Federal Supreme Court of Austria, and points also to an earlier French ruling that is in accord, Cour d'appel de Grenoble of 13 September 1995.[**]

To consider decisions of sister jurisdictions, courts must be able to read them. The Institute of International Commercial Law of the Pace University School of Law, in collaboration with the Centre for Commercial Law Studies of Queen Mary College of the University of London, has inaugurated an English text program and case translation programme.

* We have also seen other cases, e.g., from the United States: Filanto v. Chilewich, 789 F. Supp. 1229, 1237 (S.D.N.Y. 14 April 1992) ("there is as yet virtually no U.S. case law interpreting the Sale of Goods Convention"); Beijing Metals v. American Business Center, 993 F.2d 1178 (5^th Cir. 15 June 1993) (citing Filanto "there is as yet virtually no U.S. case law interpreting the Sale of Goods Convention"); Delchi v. Rotorex, 71 F.3d 1024, 1028 (2^nd Cir 1995) ("there is virtually no case law under the Convention"); Helen Kaminski v. Marketing Australian Products, 1997 U.S. Dist. Lexis 10630 (S.D.N.Y. 23 July 1997) ("there is little to no case law on the CISG . . ."); Calzaturificio Claudia v. Olivieri Footwear, 1998 U.S. Dist. Lexis 4586 (S.D.N.Y/ 6 April 1998) ("The case law interpreting and applying the CISG is sparse", citing and quoting Kaminski "there is 'little to no case law on the CISG . . .' " and Filanto "there is virtually no United States case law interpreting the CISG"); Mitchell Aircraft Spares v. European Aircraft Service, 25 F. Supp. 2d 916 (N.D. Ill. 27 October 1998)) (" 'there is virtually no case law under the Convention' ", quoting Delchi); Supermicro Computer v. Digitechnic, 2001 U.S. Dist. Lexis 7620 (N.D. Cal. 30 January 2001) ("the case law interpreting and applying the CISG is sparse", citing Delchi); Schmitz-Werke v. Rockland, 2002 U.S. App. Lexis 12336 (4th Cir. 21 June 2002) ("case law interpreting the CISG is rather sparse", citing Calzaturificio Claudia); Macromex Srl. v. Globex International Inc., 2008 WL 1752530 (S.D.N.Y. 16 April 2008) "there is virtually no case law under the Convention", quoting Delchi); and most recently Miami Valley Paper, LLC v. Lebbing Engineering & Consulting GmbH, 2009 WL 818618 (S.D.Ohio 26 March 2009) "caselaw interpreting and applying the CISG is sparse", quoting Calzaturificio Claudia.

Contrast the case research by these courts with Flechtner's assessment of the case research that CISG article 7(1) requires. He states that article 7(1) of the CISG "[p]roperly understood ... requires a process or methodology involving awareness of ... interpretations of the CISG from outside one's own legal culture -- an approach not unlike the treatment U.S. courts accord decisions of other [U.S.] jurisdictions when applying [the U.S.] Uniform Commercial Code." Harry M. Flechtner, "Several Texts of the CISG in a Decentralized System: Observations on Translations, Reservations and Other Challenges to the Uniformity Principle in Article 7(1)", 17 Journal of Law & Commerce (1998) 187 <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/flecht1.html>. Hackney elaborates. He states that "when interpreting the Convention, a court should look to other court's interpretations of the Convention, including the interpretations of courts from other countries" and that "[t]he use in the U.S. of case law to interpret the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) can serve as a model for courts using case law to interpret the Convention. No state within the U.S. is bound by an interpretation of the UCC from another state, but the interpretations of the UCC from other jurisdictions are extremely persuasive. While this method does not achieve exact uniformity, the U.S. has achieved a level of uniformity of sales law that is useful to companies transacting business in many states." Philip T. Hackney, "Is the United Nations Convention on the International Sale of Goods Achieving Uniformity?, 61 Louisiana Law Review (2001) 479.

The Supreme Court of Alaska put it as follows:

"Although precedent from other jurisdictions is, of course, not binding upon us, we nonetheless are mindful of the fact that a basic objective of the Uniform Commercial Code is to promote national uniformity in the commercial area and that this objective would be undermined should we decline to follow the stated intent of the Code's drafters and the reasoned decisions of a number of other jurisdictions." Escrow Closing and Consulting ABM, Inc. v. Matanuska Maid, Inc.,659 P.2d 1170, 1172 (Alaska 1983).

** René Henschel, Conformity of Goods in International Sales Governed by the CISG, Nordic Journal of Commercial Law, issue 2004 #1, article 2 at 9.

The MCC-Marble court advises that the website <http://cisg.law.pace.edu> is "a promising source" for "persuasive authority from courts of other states party to the CISG" (op. cit. at n.14). For a current example of reliance on the global jurisconsultorium by counsel, go to Trebacher Industrie, A.G. v. TDT, and the appellate pleading reported with the presentation of that case at <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050427u1.html>.

This website reports over 3,000 cases <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/text/casecit.html>. They are cases from 51 jurisdictions. Each case can be relevant to the interpretation of the CISG in any jurisdiction.

• Drawing on the cases reported on our website, Pace and Queen Mary, in collaboration with scholars of many countries, have inaugurated an English text program and a case translation programme. The [QM] programme currently includes translations of over 150 Supreme Court or Highest Constitutional Court decisions and numerous other decisions. Pace and [QM] wish to expand this work. We enlist your help.

• We have invited participation in the case translation programme by interested members of the Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot Alumni Association (MAA) and others. [For information on our Moot on the CISG, go to <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/vis.html>.] We invite participation by all interested persons with language fluencies who believe in the concept of uniform law and would like to help us tame the dragons of case law. Join us. Help us serve our profession and the world trade community this way. Contacts are: Loukas A. Mistelis <L.Mistelis@qmw.ac.uk> or Vikki Rogers <vrogers@law.pace.edu>.

The object of the programme is to share lessons learned by sharing the reasoning of jurists of all countries. The English texts and translated texts we now provide chart as follows.

Chart of 1,885 "tamed and assigned dragons"

---

Jurisdiction	Lower Court	Appellate Court	Supreme Court	Arbitral Tribunal	Totals
American Arb. Assoc.				2	2
Argentina	5	6			11
Australia	7	5			12
Austria	3	20	54	3	80
Belarus	1		1	1	3
Belgium	25	24	1		50
Brazil		3	3		6
Bulgaria				12	12
Canada	11	1	1		13
Chile			1		1
China	27	23	6	335	391
Colombia			1		1
Czech Republic			2		2
Denmark	2	2	1		5
Egypt				3	3
Estonia		1			1
Finland	2	6			8
France	6	41	25	1	73
Germany	136	143	26	6	311
Hungary	3	3	3	4	13
ICC				45	45
Iran Tribunal				1	1
Israel			3		3
Italy	23	4	10	2	39
Mexico	6	4		3	13
Montenegro		1			1
Netherlands	30	16	2	3	51
New Zealand	2	4			6
Poland			5	1	6
Romania			1		1
Russia	1	20	9	212	242
Serbia		9		35	44
Singapore			1		1
Slovak Republic	56	8	11		75
Slovenia		3	1		4
Spain	8	47	5		60
Stockholm Chamber of Commerce				3	3
Switzerland	53	49	24	1	127
Ukraine	1	1	1	21	24
United Kingdom		2	1		3
United States	119	18			137
Vietnam		1			1
Totals	527	465	199	694	1,885

---

We list three categories of cases: [QM] cases processed pursuant to the Queen Mary Case Translation Programme <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/text/queenmary.html>, [CTN] cases processed pursuant to the CISG Case Translation Network, and other cases.

• Three levels of scholars review each case translation prior to its publication as an integrated part of an Internet case presentation.
  • Researchers can link to these case translations, and we offer links to presentations that contain additional data on each case. As a general rule, the contents of each case presentation also include an abstract of the case (usually an UNCITRAL abstract) and a link to the original text of the case, a case text generally entered on the Internet by the center for international studies of a collaborating university, a member of the Autonomous Network of CISG Websites <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/network.html>. The typical linked table of contents to our case presentations reads:
    • Case identification
      
    • UNCITRAL case abstract
      
    • Classification of issues present
      
    • Editorial remarks
      
    • Citations to other case abstracts, texts and commentaries
      
    • Text of case
      
    • English translation of text of case

    By jumping from these underlined links in the case presentations, researchers can access additional information on each case, often including full texts of scholarly commentaries on the case. Other case presentation features include links to key provisions of the CISG at issue, links that enable researchers to jump to other interpretations of the provisions of the uniform law that are reviewed in the case you are considering. These are links to other judicial and arbitral interpretations of these provisions by tribunals of different countries. Our case presentations also link to Annotated texts of Articles of the CISG <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/text/cisg-toc.html>. Our Annotated texts provide additional information on the provisions of the CISG of interest: information on their legislative history, on doctrine associated with these provisions, etc.

  • The listings in the report below identify final texts of case translations and case translations that are still "second-iteration" texts, i.e., draft translations. These are underlined listings preceded by asterisks. Researchers may jump to these draft translations too. All such translations are, of course, accompanied by the caveat associated with any draft. Even so, we regard it as helpful to share our drafts with researchers anxious to access the most current information we have because, due to the caliber of scholars the programs have attracted, it has been our experience that further edits to second-iterations translations such as these have generally proved to be modest.

  • The following report also identifies still other case translations in process. Those listings are not underlined; researchers cannot now jump from them to the texts of in-process translations. These are "coming-attractions" we provide to identify case translations that have not yet progressed to the "second-iteration" stage of the process. For such listings, in lieu of providing links to drafts of translated texts, we simply report the cases to identify translations that will be made available at a future date. We do, however, provide links to presentations that contain other information on those cases: generally an abstract of the case, a link to the text of the case in its original language, and other relevant material on the case.

The entries in our country-by-country schedule of case presentations number over 3,000 <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/text/casecit.html>. The entries in the following report on English case texts and case translations number 1,885. This, of course, means we have many more cases to translate. With your help, we will increase the number of translated case texts we can offer to our profession. The date of the following report is 10 August 2015. Each of the 1,885 cases we report is identified by URL; researchers who wish to jump to these case texts and case translations may do so by clicking these URLs.

---

Our "dragon taming" programme
We invite you to participate

[For persons unfamiliar with the courts we cite -- drawing on material developed by Autonomous Network colleagues, we present court hierarchy charts for many of these jurisdictions <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/text/casecit.html>. This collection of court hierarchy charts will be expanded.]

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

23 October 2007 AAA Interim Award Case No. 50181T 0036406 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071023a5.html>
12 December 2007 AAA Final Award Case No. 50181T 0036406 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071212a5.html>

ARGENTINA

* 20 May 1991, Elastar Sacifia v. Bettcher Industries Inc., Juzgado Nacional [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cisg/cases/910520a1.html>
* 23 October 1991, Aguila Refractarios v. Conc. preventivo, Juzgado Nacional [QM-ab] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/911023a1.html>
14 October 1993, Inta v. MCS Officina Meccanica, Cámera National [editorial remarks with relevant excerpts] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/931014a1.html>
6 October 1994, Bermatex S.r.l v. Valentin Rius, Juzgado Nacional [QM-jmf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941006a1.html>
* 31 October 1995, Bedial S.A. v. Paul Müggenburg GmbH, Cámara Nacional [QM-jmf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951031a1.html>
24 April 2000 Cámera Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Comercial [QM-jbl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000424a1.html>
* 21 July 2002 Cámara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Comercial [QM-jo/prm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020721a1.html>
* 17 March 2003, Wacker-Polymer v. Glaube Juzgado Comercial [QM-jmf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030317a1.html>
April 2003, Autoservicio v. Quiebra Juzgado Comercial [QM-jmf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030400a1.html>
* 2 July 2003 Juzgado Comercial [QM-jmf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030702a1.html>
* 31 May 2007 Cámera Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Comercial [QM-lgmm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070531a1.html>
5 October 2009 Juzgado Nacional en lo Comercial de Buenos Aires (Sanovo c/ Ovoprot) [QM-] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091005a1.html>
* 7 October 2010 Cámara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Comercial de Buenos Aires (Ecotune (India) Private Ltd. c/ Cencosud SA, s/ Ordinario) [QM-ehv/jbmd/dc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/101007a1.html>

AUSTRALIA

12 March 1992, Renard v. Minister, New South Wales Court of Appeal [editorial remarks with relevant excerpt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/920312a2.html>
28 April 1995, Roder v. Rosedown, Adelaide Federal District Court <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950428a2.html>
17 November 2000, Downs Investments v. Perwaja Steel, Supreme Court of Queensland <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001117a2.html>
1 February 2001, Perry Engineering v. Bernold, Supreme Court of South Australia <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010201a2.html>
12 October 2001, Downs Investment v Perwaja Steel, Supreme Court of Queensland, Court of Appeal <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011012a2.html>
17 January 2003, Ginza Pte v Vista Corp., Supreme Court of Western Australia <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030117a2.html>
24 April 2003, Playcorp Pty Ltd v Taiyo Kogyo Ltd, Supreme Court of Victoria <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030424a2.html>
27 May 2004, Summit Chemicals v Vetrotex Espana, Supreme Court of Western Australia – Court of Appeal <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040527a2.html>
13 October 2006 Italian Imported Foods Pty LKtd v Pucci S.r.l., Supreme Court of New South Wales <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061013a2.html>
24 October 2008 Hannaford v Australian Farmlink Pty Ltd, Federal Court [South Australia District] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081024a2.html>
6 August 2010 Supreme Court of Victoria (Delphic Wholesalers (Aust) Pty Ltd v. Agrilex Co. Limited) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100806a2.html>
28 September 2010 Federal Court of Australia (Castel Electronics Pty. Ltd. v. Toshiba Singapore Pte. Ltd.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100928a2.html>

AUSTRIA

20 February 1992 Bezirksgericht für Handelssachen <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/920220a3.html>
15 June 1994 Vienna Arbitration No. SCH-4318 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940615a4.html>
15 June 1994 Vienna Arbitration No. SCH-4366 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940615a3.html>
1 July 1994 Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940701a3.html>
27 October 1994 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941027a3.html>
10 November 1994 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-me/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941110a3.html>
9 November 1995 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951109a3.html>
6 February 1996 Oberster Gerichtshof <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960206a3.html>
11 February 1997 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970211a3.html>
20 March 1997 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970320a3.html>
24 April 1997 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970424a3.html>
18 June 1997 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-tk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970618a3.html>
11 September 1997 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-pf/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970911a3.html>
10 December 1997 Vienna Arbitration No. S 2/97 [QM-tk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971210a3.html>
12 February 1998 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-pf/rm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980212a3.html>
10 March 1998 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-vk/db] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980310a3.html>
11 March 1998 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-fa/vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980311a3.html>
30 June 1998 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-nc/db] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980630a3.html>
15 October 1998 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-me/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981015a3.html>
15 December 1998 Oberster Gerichsthof [QM-tk/vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981215a3.html
19 January 1999 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-vk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990119a3.html>
24 February 1999 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-vk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990224a3.html>
11 March 1999 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jw/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990311a3.html
19 May 1999 Oberster Gerichtshof [PK-BK] <http://www.cisg.at/9_1399ye.htm>
29 June 1999 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-pf/lf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990629a3.html>
28 July 1999 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-fa/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990311a3.html>
27 August 1999 Oberster Gerichtshof [pk-bk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990827a3.html>
9 March 2000 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-mm/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000309a3.html>
21 March 2000 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-vk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000321a3.html
13 April 2000 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-en] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000413a3.html>
28 April 2000 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-rj/eo] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000428a3.html>
15 June 2000 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-vk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000615a3.html>
7 September 2000 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-fa/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000907a3.html>
28 September 2000 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-vk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000928a3.html>
24 January 2001 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010124a3.html>
5 July 2001 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010705a3.html>
13 September 2001 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010913a3.html>
22 October 2001 Oberster Gerichtshof, 1 Ob 49/01i [QM-rj/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011022a3.html>
22 October 2001 Oberster Gerichtshof, 1 Ob 77/01g [QM-rj/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011022a4.html>
14 January 2002 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-tf/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020114a3.html>
24 January 2002 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-vk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020124a3.html>
7 March 2002 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-vk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020307a3.html>
17 April 2002 Oberster Gerichtshof [7 Ob 54/02w] [QM-vk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020417a3.html>
17 April 2002 Oberster Gerichtshof [7 Ob 57/02m] [QM-vk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020417a4.html>
26 April 2002 Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck [QM-ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020426a3.html>
31 May 2002 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020531a3.html>
16 September 2002 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020916a3.html>
18 December 2002 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021218a3.html>
27 February 2003 Oberster Gerichtshof [AB-bk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030227a3.html>
17 December 2003 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-vk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031217a3.html>
21 April 2004 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040421a3.html>
29 July 2004 Oberlandesgericht Graz [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040729a3.html>
14 December 2004 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-df/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041214a3.html>
26 January 2005 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-vk-cba] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050126a3.html>
1 February 2005 Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050201a3.html>
2 February 2005 Landesgericht Salzburg [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050202a3.html>
23 March 2005 Oberlandesgericht Linz [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050323a3.html>
13 May 2005 Landgericht Freiburg [QM-sd] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050513g1.html>
26 April 2005 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050426a3.html>
23 May 2005 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-sk/sh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050523a3.html>
24 May 2005 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-df/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050524a3.html>
1 June 2005 Oberlandesgericht Linz [QM-sd/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050601a3.html>
21 June 2005 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050621a3.html>
8 August 2005 Oberlandesgericht Linz [QM-sd/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050808a3.html>
31 August 2005 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-tf/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050831a3.html>
8 November 2005 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jh/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051108a3.html>
29 November 2005 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-ta/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051129a3.html>
23 January 2006 Oberlandesgericht Linz [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060123a3.html>
25 January 2006 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060125a3.html>
12 September 2006 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060912a3.html>
30 November 2006 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061130a3.html>
19 April 2007 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-vk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070419a3.html>
3 May 2007 Handelsgericht Wien [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070503a3.html>
4 July 2007 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070704a3.html>
24 September 2007 Oberlandesgericht Linz [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070924a3.html>
18 December 2007 Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071218a3.html>
19 December 2007 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071219a3.html>
3 April 2008 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080403a3.html>
8 May 2008 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080508a3.html>
2 April 2009 Oberster Gerichtshof [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090402a3.html>

BELARUS

5 October 1995, ATT v. Arco, Belarusian Chamber of Commerce and Industry International Court of Arbitration Case No. 24/13-29 [QM-ts] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951005b5.html>
31 July 2006 Bird factory case, Cassational Board of the Supreme Economic Court [QM-kl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060731b5.html>
* 8 November 2006 Commercial Court of the Brest Region [CTN-am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061108b5.html>

BELGIUM

* 13 November 1992, Maglificio Dalmine S.r.l. v. S.C. Covires, Tribunal commercial de Bruxelles [QM-ah] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/921113b1.html>
* 5 October 1994 Tribunal commercial de Bruxelles [QM-dk/kkk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941005b1.html>
19 September 1995, Gantry v. Research Consulting Marketing, Tribunal de commerce Nivelles [QM-cs/tk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950919b1.html>
* 18 June 1996 Hof van Beroep Antwerpen [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960618b1.html>
* 6 October 1997, Wonderfil v. Depraetere Industries, Rechtbank van Koophandel Kortrijk [QM-yps] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971006b1.html>
* 7 April 1998 Hof van Beroep Antwerp [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980407b1.html>
* 4 November 1998 Hof van Beroep Antwerpen [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981104b1.html>
* 18 May 1999 Hof van Beroep Antwerp (Vandermaesen Viswaren v. Euromar Seafood) [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990518b1.html>
26 April 2000, B.V.B.A. J.P. v. s. Ltd, Hof van Beroep Gent [QM-bs/se] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000426b1.html>
29 January 2001 Rechtbank van Koophandel Ieper [QM-tm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010129b1.html>
8 March 2001 Cour d’appel Mons [QM-kkk/lm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010308b1.html>
25 April 2001, BV BA G-2 v. AS C.B., Rechtbank van Koophandel Veurne [QM-vn/se] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010425b1.html>
23 May 2001, H.T. GmbH v. N.V. R., Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-bs/se] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010523b1.html>
27 June 2001 S.r.l. R.C. v. BV BA R.T., Hof van Beroep Antwerpen [QM-vn/se] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010627b1.html>
* 10 July 2001 Rb Oudenaarde [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010710b1.html>
15 January 2002 Tribunal de Commerce Namur [QM-cs/tk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020115b1.html>
18 January 2002 Rechtbank van Koophandel Mechelen [QM-tm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020118b1.html>
* 14 February 2002 Hof van Beroep Antwerp (NV Carta Mundi v. Index Syndicate Ltd.) [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020214b1.html>
6 March 2002, Zapatos Mediterraneos v. Shoe Bizz, Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-vn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020306b1.html>
6 March 2002, Roelants Eurosprint v. Beltronic, Rechtbank van Koophandel Hattelt [QM-vn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020306b2.html>
15 May 2002, NV A.R. v. NV I., Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-bs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020515b1.html>
22 May 2002, R. B.V. NV v. J.V. B.V., Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-bs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020522b1.html>
* 16 December 2002 Hof van Beroep Antwerpen [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021216b1.html>
* 19 March 2003 Rb Veurne [QM-bs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030319b1.html>
28 April 2003 Cour d'appel Liège [QM-jh/lm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030428b1.html>
* 8 October 2003 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031008b1.html>
* 29 October 2003 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031029b1.html>
6 January 2004 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-yw/tk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040106b1.html>
* 27 January 2004 Cour d'appel Liège [QM-lm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040127b1.html>
28 January 2004 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-yw/tk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040128b1.html>
4 February 2004 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-dk/yw] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040204b1.html>
25 February 2004 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-ev/tk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040225b1.html>
25 February 2004 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-ev/tk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040225b2.html>
* 24 March 2004 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040324b1.html>
* 14 April 2004 Hof van Beroep Antwerp (Cooling installation sensors case) [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040414b1.html>
* 10 May 2004 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-tt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040510b1.html>
* 17 May 2004 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040517b1.html>
* 4 June 2004 Rechtbank van Koophandel Kortrijk [QM-vm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040604b1.html>
* 16 June 2004 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040616b1.html>
* 30 June 2004 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040630b1.html>
* 4 October 2004 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041004b1.html>
* 11 October 2004 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041011b1.html>
* 20 October 2004 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-tt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041020b1.html>
* 8 November 2004 Hof van Bereop Ghent [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041108b1.html>
* 24 November 2004 Hof van Beroep Ghent [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041124b1.html>
* 3 January 2005 Hof van Beroep Antwerp [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050103b1.html>
25 January 2005 Rechtbank van Koophandel Tongeren [QM-tt/kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050125b1.html>
* 31 January 2005 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050131b1.html>
14 September 2005 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-bs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050914b1.html>
* 20 September 2005 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050920b1.html>
* 15 February 2006 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060215b1.html>
* 19 April 2006 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060419b1.html>
* 24 April 2006 Hof van Beroep Antwerpen [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060424b1.html>
* 10 May 2006 Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060510b1.html>
* 22 January 2007 Hof van Beroep Antwerp (N.V. Secremo v. Helmut Papst) [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070122b1.html>
* 22 January 2007 Hof van Beroep Antwerp (BVBA I.T.M v. S.A. Montanier) [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070122b2.html>
* 16 April 2007 Hof van Beroep Antwerp [QM-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070416b1.html>
* 3 October 2007 Commercial Court Hasselt [CTN-gn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071003b1.html>
* 14 November 2008 Hof van Beroep Gent [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081114b1.html>
* 19 June 2009 Court of Cassation [QC-kc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090619b1.html>

BRAZIL
* 1 March 2001 Superior Court of Justice [CTN-vsv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010301b5.html>

3 July 2007 Appellate Court São Paulo [QM-lgmm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070703b5.html>
24 April 2008 Appellate Court São Paulo [QM-lgmm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080424b5.html>
20 May 2009 Appellate Court Rio Grande do Sul [QM-lgmm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090520b5.html>
* 19 August 2009 Superior Court of Justice (Atecs vs. Rodrimar) [CTN-pm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090819b5.html>
15 February 2003 Appellate Court Valencia [CTN-lm/ppv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030215s4.html>

BULGARIA

24 January 1994 Arbitration Case 39/93 [QM-bb/vv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940124bu.html>
24 April 1996 Arbitration Case 56/1995 [QM-bb/vv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960424bu.html>
* 29 September 1997 Arbitration Case 71-94 [QM-bb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970929bu.html>
* 2 February 1998 Arbitration Case 20/97 [QM-bb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980202bu.html>
12 February 1998 Arbitration Case 11/1996 [QM-bb/vv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980212bu.html>
* 16 February 1998 Arbitration Case 59/1995 [QM-bb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980216bu.html>
* 30 November 1998 Arbitration Case 14/98 [QM-bb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981130bu.html>
24 July 2000 Arbitration Case 36/99 [QM-bb/vv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000724bu.html>
12 March 2001 Arbitration Case 33/98 [QM-bb/vv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010312bu.html>
19 March 2001 Arbitration Case 26/00 [QM-bb/vv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010319bu.html>
* 12 June 2001 Arbitration Case 41/00 [QM-bb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010612bu.html>
* 28 February 2002 Arbitration Case 26/99 [QM-bb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020228bu.html>

CANADA

16 December 1998, Nova Tool v. London Industrues, Ontario Court, General Division <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981216c4.html>
31 August 1999, San Guiseppe v. Forti Moulding, Ontario Superior Court of Justice <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990831c4.html>
3 April 2002 Queen's Bench Saskatchewan (Beechy Stock Farm Ltd. v. Managro Harvestore Systems Ltd.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020403c4.html>
20 September 2002, Brown & Root v. Aerotech, Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020920c4.html>
14 March 2003 Supreme Court of British Columbia (Multiactive Software Inc. v. Advanced Service Solutions Inc.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030314c4.html>
21 August 2003, Mansonville v. Kurtz, Supreme Court, British Columbia <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030821c4.html>
6 October 2003, Diversitel v. Glacier, Ontario Supreme Court of Justice <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031006c4.html>
14 November 2003, Shane v. JCB Belgium, Ontario Superior Court of Justice <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031114c4.html>
4 January 2004, Shane v. JCB Belgium, Ontario Superior Court of Justice <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040104c4.html>
4 May 2004, Brown & Root v. Aerotech, Court of Appeal of Manitoba <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040504c4.html>
28 October 2005, Chateau des Charmes Ltd v. Sabaté USA Inc. et al., Ontario Superior Court of Justice <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051028c4.html>
20 September 2007 Superior Court of Justice, Ontario (Guiliani v. Invar Manufacturing) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070920c4.html>
14 March 2011 Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan (Houweling Nurseries Oxnard, Inc. v Saskatoon Boiler Mfg. Co. Ltd.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/110314c4.html>

CHILE

* 22 September 2008 Supreme Court [QM-lr/mb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080922ch.html>

CHINA

* 4 August 1988 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/880804c1.html>
1989 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CIETAC] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/890000c1.html>
13 June 1989 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/890613c1.html>
Post-1989 CIETAC Arbitration Award, Contract #QFD890011 [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/900000c1.html>
1 September 1990 Supreme Court [QM-zz], <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/900901.c1.html>
* 18 April 1991 CIETAC Arbitration Award - Shenzhen [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/910418c1.html>`
* 19 April 1991 CIETAC Arbitration Award - Shenzhen [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/910419c1.html>
6 June 1991 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-wh/lh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/910606c1.html>
30 October 1991 CIETAC Arbitration Award <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/911030c1.html>
16 December 1991 CIETAC Arbitration Award [Case 79] [QM-bz]
16 December 1991 CIETAC Arbitration Award [Case 80] [CISG/1991/05] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/911216c1.html>
Post-1992 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CIETAC] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930000c2.html>
9 January 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/03] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930109c1.html
20 January 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/04] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930120c1.html>
25 February 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/05] [QM-cg/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930225c1.html>
27 February 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/01] [M. Will] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930227c1.html>
* 26 March 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/06] [QM-xp/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930326c1.html>
30 March 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/07] [QM-yt/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930330c1.html>
1 April 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [Link to Unilex case translation] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930401c1.html>
* 20 April 1993 Xiamen Intermediate People's Court [QM-zx/NYU] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930420c1.html>
5 July 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/08] [NYU-tl/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930705c1.html>
10 July 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/09] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930710c1.html>
20 July 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/10] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930720c1.html>
7 August 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/11] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930807c1.html>
26 October 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/12] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/931026c1.html>
20 December 1993 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1993/13] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/931220c1.html>
20 January 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/02] [NYU-fw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940120c1.html>
20 February 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/03] [CIETAC] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940220c1.html>
30 March 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/04] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940330c1.html>
6 April 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/05] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940406c1.html>
11 April 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/06] [QM-qy/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940411c1.html>
10 May 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/07] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940510c1.html>
17 June 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/08] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940617c1.html>
11 August 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/09] [QM-zh/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940811c1.html>
5 September 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/10] [QM-cg/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940905c2.html>
19 September 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/11] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940919c1.html>
29 September 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/12] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940929c1.html>
25 October 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/13] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941025c1.html>
* December 1994 Fujian Higher Peoples Court [QM-wd] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941200c1.html>
12 December 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/14] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941212c1.html>
28 December 1994 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1994/15] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941228c1.html>
4 January 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/02] [QM-cg/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950104c1.html>
23 February 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-fy-hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950223c1.html>
10 March 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/03] [QM-ws/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950310c2.html>
10 March 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/04] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950310c1.html>
22 March 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-kz/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950322c1.html>
18 April 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/06] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950418c1.html>
23 April 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/07] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950423c1.html>
28 April 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/08] [QM-cw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950428c1.html>
* 15 May 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/09] [NYU-jw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950515c1.html>
16 May 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/10] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950516c1.html>
5 August 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/11] [QM-ws/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950805c1.html>
* 18 September 1995 Chansha Intermediate People's Court [QM-wd] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950918c1.html>
15 December 1995 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1995/12] [Sweet & Maxwell] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951215c1.html>
12 January l996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/03] [QM-mx/ll] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960112c1.html>
22 January 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/04] [QM-mx/ll] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960122c1.html>
30 January 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/05] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960130c1.html>
5 February 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/06][QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960205c1.html>
5 February 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/07] [QM-mx/ll] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960205c2.html>
12 February 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/08] [QM-mx/ll] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960212c1.html>
14 February 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/09] [QM-mx/ll] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960214c1.html>
15 February 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/10] [QM-yx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960215c1.html>
27 February 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960227c1.html>
8 March 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/12] [QM-zx/hy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960308c1.html>
8 March 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/13] [QM-mx/ll] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960308c2.html>
14 March 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/14] [QM-cw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960314c1.html>
29 March 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/15] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960329c1.html>
29 March 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/16] [QM-yt/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960329c2.html>
3 April 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/17] [NYU-jw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960403c1.html>
4 April 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/18] [NYU-kf/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960404c1.html>
17 April 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/19] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960417c1.html>
30 April 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960430c1.html>
2 May 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [1996/CISG/21] [QM-zx/hy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960502c1.html>
10 May 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/22] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960510c1.html>
14 May 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960514c1.html>
* 16 May 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/24] [QM-mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960516c1.html>
22 May 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/25] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960522c1.html>
29 May 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/26] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960529c1.html>
31 May 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/27] [NYU-kf/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960531c1.html>
12 July 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/28] [QM-zx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960712c1.html>
12 July 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/29] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960712c3.html>
12 July 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/30] [QM-gy/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960712c2.html>
16 July 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-kz/hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960716c1.html>
30 July 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/32] [QM-mx/lp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960730c1.html>
30 July 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/33] [QM-mx/lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960730c2.html>
31 July 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/34] [QM-mx/lk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960731c1.html>
6 August 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/35] [QM-cg/jc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960806c1.html>
8 August 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/36] [QM-gy/zc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960808c1.html>
9 August 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/37] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960809c2.html>
9 August 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/38] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960809c1.html>
16 August 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/39] [QM-gy/lp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960816c1.html>
30 August 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/40] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960830c1.html>
* 4 September 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [1996/CISG/41] [QM-zx/fz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960904c1.html>
6 September 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/42] [QM-mx/lk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960906c1.html>
18 September 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/01] [QM-yx/cj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960918c1.html>
18 September 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/43] [NYU-kf/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960918c2.html>
28 September 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/44] [QM-nz/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960928c1.html>
10 October 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/45] [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961010c1.html>
15 October 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/46] [QM-mx/lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961015c1.html>
17 October 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/47] [NYU-bh/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961017c1.html>
23 October 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/48] [NYU-jw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961023c1.html>
26 October 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/49] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961026c1.html>
7 November 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/50] [NYU-jw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961107c1.html>
11 November 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/51] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961111c1.html>
* 15 November 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/52] [QM-mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961115c1.html>
18 November 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/53] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961118c1.html>
25 November 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961125c1.html>
28 November 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/54] [QM-zc/wxy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961128c1.html>
17 December 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/55] [QM-mx/lk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961217c1.html>
18 December 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/56] [QM-cg/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961218c1.html>
23 December 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/57] [QM-nz/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961223c1.html>
31 December 1996 Fujian Higher People's Court [QM-mx-cj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961231c1.html>
31 December 1996 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1996/58] [QM-zt/gy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961231c2.html>
1997 Shanghai Higher Peoples Court [QM-wd/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970000c1.html>
6 February 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-jc/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970206c1.html>
6 March 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970306c1.html>
1 April 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/02] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970401c1.html>
2 April 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/03] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970402c1.html>
4 April 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/04] [QM-zc/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970404c1.html>
11 April 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [1997/CISG/05] [QM-nz/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970411c1.html>
15 April 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/06] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970415c1.html>
23 April 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/07] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970423c1.html>
23 April 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/08] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970423c2.html>
24 April 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/09] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970424c1.html>
30 April 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/10] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970430c1.html>
7 May 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/11] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970507c2.html>
7 May 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/12] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970507c1.html>
22 May 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/13] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970522c1.html>
2 June 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/14] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970602c1.html>
16 June 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/15] [NYU-fw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970616c1.html>
25 June 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/16] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970625c1.html>
26 June 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/17] [NYU-tl/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970626c1.html>
27 June 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/18] [QM-mx/lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970627c1.html>
4 July 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/19] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970704c1.html>
7 July 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/20] [NYU-jw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970707c1.html>
10 July 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/21] [QM-zc/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970710c1.html>
21 July 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/22] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970721c1.html>
23 July 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/23] [QM-yt/lk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970723c1.html>
31 July 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970731c1.html>
5 August 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/25] [QM-bh/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970805c1.html>
18 August 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/26] [QM-lp/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970818c1.html>
8 September 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [1997/CISG/27] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970908c1.html>
10 September 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/39] [Sweet & Maxwell] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970910c1.html>
29 September 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/28] [NYU-kf/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970929c1.html>
8 October 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/29] [QM-zt/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971008c1.html>
13 October 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/30] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971013c1.html>
27 October 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971027c1.html>
20 November 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/32] [QM-mx/lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971120c1.html>
30 November 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/33] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971130c1.html>
15 December 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/34] [QM-zc/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971215c1.html>
16 December 1997 CIETAC award [CISG/1997/35] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971216c1.html>
19 December 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/36] [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971219c1.html>
31 December 1997 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1997/37] [QM-an/mx] http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971231c1.html>
20 January 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980120c1.html>
22 January 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mp/an] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980122c1.html>
* 23 January 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980123c1.html>
24 March 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-qz/hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980324c1.html>
22 June 1998 Shanghai Second Intermediate People's Court [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980622c1.html>
30 July 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980730c1.html>
25 September 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1998/12] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980925c1.html>
26 November 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1998/06] [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981126c1.html>
26 November 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1998/07] [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981126c2.html>
30 November 1998 CIETAC award [CISG/1998/08] [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981130c1.html>
15 December 1998 CIETAC award [CISG/1998/09] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981215c1.html>
24 December 1998 CIETAC award [CISG/1998/05] [QM-mx/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981224c1.html>
25 December 1998 CIETAC award [CISG/1998/10] [QM-zc/mx] http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981225c2.html>
25 December 1998 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1998/11] [QM-lp/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981225c1.html>
1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/01] [QM-jx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990000c1.html>
* 6 January 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/04] [QM-ws] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990106c1.html>
13 January 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/05] [QM-zc/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990113c1.html>
28 January 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/06] [NYU-tl/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990128c1.html>
3 February 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/07] [QM-mx/lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990203c1.html>
12 February 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/08] [QM-lp/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990212c1.html>
12 February 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/09] [QM-zc/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990212c2.html>
25 February 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/10] [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990225c2.html>
25 February 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/11] [QM-lz/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990225c1.html>
* 1 March 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [1999/CISG/12] [QM-nz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990301c1.html>
* 25 March 1999 CIETAC award [CISG/1999/13] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990325c1.html>
29 March 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/14] [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990329c1.html>
30 March 1999 CIETAC award [CISG/1999/15] [QM-jw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990330c3.html>
30 March 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/16] [QM-cm/xy] http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990330c2.html>
30 March 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/17] [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990330c1.html>
2 April 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/18] [QM-mx/lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990402c1.html>
5 April 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/19] [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990405c1.html>
7 April 1999 CIETAC award [CISG/1999/20] [QM-fw/yt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990407c1.html>
8 April 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/21] [QM-ws/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990408c1.html>
12 April 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/22] [QM-an/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990412c1.html>
20 April 1999 CIETAC award [CISG/1999/23] [NYU-tl/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990420c1.html>
* 20 May 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/25] [QM-lz/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990520c1.html>
20 May 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/24] [QM-lz/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990520c2.html>
21 May 1999 CIETAC award [CISG/1999/26] [QM-zx/lp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990521ci.html>
28 May 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/jc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990528c1.html>
31 May 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-ws/lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990531c1.html>
June 1999 PR China Arbitration Award [QM-yx/lp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990600c1.html>
4 June 1999 CIETAC award [CISG/1999/28] [QM-zx/lp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990604c1.html>
11 June 1999 CIETAC award [CISG/1999/29] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990611c1.html>
* 30 June 1999 CIETAC award [CISG/1999/31] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990630c2.html>
30 June 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/30] [QM-mx/lp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990630c1.html>
* 20 July 1999 Supreme Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990720c1.html>
10 August 1999 CIETAC arbitration award [CISG 1999/35] [QM-zx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990810c1.html>
17 December 1999 Rizho Intermediate People's Court [QM-wd/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991217c1.html>
29 December 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/1999/33] [QM-yt/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991229c1.html>
31 December 1999 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/gh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991231c1.html>
2000 CIETAC Arbitration award [CISG/2000/17] [QM-zx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000000c1.html>
7 January 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-an/hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000107c1.html>
11 January 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-ws/lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000111c1.html>
19 January 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-an/hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000119c1.html>
30 January 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000130c1.html>
31 January 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/2000/09] [QM-mx/hyy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000131c1.html>
1 February 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/lp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000201c1.html>
11 February 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-xy/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000211c1.html>
31 March 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000331c1.html>
27 April 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000427c1.html>
23 May 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000523c1.html>
* 30 June 2000 Wuhan Economic and Technology Zone People's Court [QM-jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000630c1.html>
17 July 2000 Higher People's Court of He'nan Province [QM-gx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000717c1.html>
27 July 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/jc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000727c1.html>
* 8 August 2000 Supreme Court [QM-zx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000808c1.html>
10 August 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-yx/jc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000810c1.html>
29 September 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/2000/15] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000929c1.html>
* 29 September 2000 Nantong Intermediate People's Court [QM-wl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000929c2.html>
6 November 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001106c1.html>
6 December 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001206c1.html>
7 December 2000 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001207c1.html>
* 11 January 2001 Supreme Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010111c1.html>
* -- February 2001 CIETAC Arbitration Award [gx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010200c1.html>
* 19 February 2001 Jiangsu Higher People's Court [QM-wd] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010219c1.html>
22 March 2001 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010322c1.html>
* 4 April 2001 Wuhan Intermediate People's Court [QM-mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010404c1.html>
* 18 July 2001 Zhejiang Cixi People’s Court [QM-wd] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010718c1.html>
12 October 2001 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011021c1.html>
* 28 November 2001 Jiangsu Higher People's Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011128c1.html>
25 December 2001 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011225c1.html>
* 4 November 2002 Shanghai Yangpu District People's Court [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021104c2.html>
* 2002 Hangzou Intermediate People's Court [QM-jl/NYU] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020002c1.html>
* 9 September 2002 Wuhan Intermediate People's Court [QM-mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020909c3.html>
4 February 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020204c1.html>
4 February 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-ff/cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020204c2.html>
* 5 March 2002 Beihai Maritime Court, Guangzi Zhuang Autonomous Region [QM-wd] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020305c1.html>
7 March 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-gj/lp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020307c1.html>
28 May 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [US court transcript] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020528c1.html>
10 June 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/jc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020610c1.html>
12 July 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-NYU/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020712c1.html>
15 July 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-NYU/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020715c1.html>
16 July 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/2002/06] [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020716c1.html>
18 July 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-NYU/jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020718c1.html>
* 23 July 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020723c1.html>
26 July 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020726c1.html>
9 August 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/2002/21] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020809c1.html>
9 September 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020909c1.html>
10 September 2002 Wuhan Maritime Court [QM-zx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020910c1.html>
13 September 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award[QM-zx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020913c1.html>
18 September 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-NYU/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020918c1.html>
23 September 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020923c1.html>
9 October 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021009c1.html>
10 October 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021010c1.html>
21 October 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021021c1.html>
25 October 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021025c1.html>
4 November 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021104c1.html>
6 November 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021106c1.html>
8 November 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021108c1.html>
11 November 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021111c1.html>
27 November 2002 Higher People's Court of Ningxia Hui Automonous Region [QM-wd/NYU] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021127c1.html>
29 November 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021129c1.html>
17 December 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021217c1.html>
18 December 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021218c1.html>
23 December 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021223c1.html>
* 25 December 2002 Higher People's Court of Jiangsu Province [QM-mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021225c1.html>
27 December 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-NYU-xl/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021227c1.html>
30 December 2002 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021230c1.html>
* 2003 Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court [Xiamen/NYU] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030000c1.html>
19 January 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030119c1.html>
17 February 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030217c1.html>
* 19 March 2003 Hubei Higher People's Court [QM-jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030319c1.html>
12 April 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030412c1.html>
* 18 April 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [English text] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030418c1.html>
3 June 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030603c1.html>
19 June 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030619c1.html>
* 23 June 2003 Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court [QM-jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030623c1.html>
26 June 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030626c1.html>
7 July 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/2003/18] [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030707c1.html>
8 July 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030708c1.html>
23 July 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030723c1.html>
17 September 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030917c1.html>
6 October 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031006c1.html>
6 November 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031106c1.html>
3 December 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031203c1.html>
10 December 2003 CIETAC Arbitation Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031210c1.html>
18 December 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031218c1.html>
31 December 2003 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031231c1.html>
14 January 2004 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040114c1.html>
12 March 2004 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/2004/04] [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040312c1.html>
23 March 2004 Shanghai Intermediate People's Court [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040323c1.html>
9 April 2004 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040409c1.html>
* 11 May 2004 Wuhan Intermediate People's Court [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040511c1.html>
June 2004 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2004/08][QM-zx/lt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040600c1.html>
11 July 2004 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/2004/03] [QM-lz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040713c1.html>
September 2004 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/2004/07][English text] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040900c1.html>
10 September 2004 Higher People's Court of Shandong Province [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040910c1.html>
29 September 2004 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040929c1.html>
10 October 2004 Higher People's Court of Guandong Province [QM-mx/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041010c1.html>
* 14 December 2004 Xiamen Intermediate People's Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041214c1.html>
24 December 2004 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2004/06] [QM-jl/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041224c1.html>
2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2005/25] (Engine block case) [QM-fp/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050000c1.html>
2005 Guangdong Higher People's Court (Possehl (HK) Limited v. China Metals & Minerals Import & Export (Shenzhen) Corporation) [QM-jl/NYU] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050000c2.html>
* 11 January 2005 Guangdong Province Higher Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050111c1.html>
* 21 January 2005 Guangdong Province Higher Court [QM-lt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050121c1.html>
21 February 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2005/14] [QM-zx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050221c1.html>
24 February 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2005/07] [QM-zx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050224c1.html>
24 February 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2005/08] [QM-zx/jwz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050224c2.html>
28 February 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-dl/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050228c1.html>
* 5 March 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-lt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050305c1.html>
* 18 March 2005 Beijing High Court [QM-jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050629c1.html>
April 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/2005/22] [QM-zx/lj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050400c1.html>
7 April 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/xy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050407c1.html>
10 May 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-fy/hy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050510c1.html>
* 24 May 2005 Shanghai No. 2 Intermediate People's Court [QM-jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050524c1.html>
25 May 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2005/09] [QM-zx/jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050525c1.html>
13 June 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-jl/zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050613c1.html>
* 24 June 2005 Shanghai No. 2 Intermediate People's Court [QM-wl/NYU] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050624c1.html>
27 June 2005 Higher People's Court of Shadong Province [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050627c1.html>
* 29 June 2005 Dalian Maritime Court [QM-fy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050629c1.html>
* 29 June 2005 Shanghai Intermediate People's Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050629c2.html>
20 July 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2005/20] [QM-zx/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050720c1.html>
12 August 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050812c1.html>
18 August 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2005/16] [QM-jl/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050818c1.html>
22 August 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2005/13] [QM-zx/jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050822c1.html>
* 30 August 2005 Shanghai Higher People's Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050830c1.html>
2 September 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2005/17] [QM-zx/jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050902c1.html>
12 September 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2005/18] [QM-jl/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050912c1.html>
15 September 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2005/15] [QM-wz/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050915c1.html>
* 21 September 2005 Supreme Court [QM-zx/NYU] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050921c1.html>
* 23 September 2005 New Pudong District People's Court of Shanghai [QM-zx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050923c1.html>
* October 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2005/24] [QM-zx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051000c1.html>
21 October 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-xw/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051021c1.html>
21 October 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2005/19] [QM-jl/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051021c2.html>
31 October 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-zx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051031c1.html>
9 November 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051109c1.html>
* 19 November 2005 Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051119c1.html>
* 28 November 2005 Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court [QM-zx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051128c1.html>
* December 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2005/23] [QM-zx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051200c1.html>
7 December 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/jz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051207c1.html>
26 December 2005 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2005/2] [QM-jl/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051226c1.html>
* February 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/16] (Fluorite case) [QM-dp/cl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060200c1.html>
23 February 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/25] [QM-js/jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060223c1.html>
March 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/23] [QM-Sheppard Mullin/fy:lwt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060300c1.html>
* April 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/20] (Water heater production line case) [QM-lw/sp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060400c1.html>
April 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/21] (Mono ethylene glycole case) [QM-wz/sw-nyu] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060400c2.html>
* May 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/06] [QM-zx/dp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060500c1.html>
* May 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/18] (LDPE film case) [QM-wz/wl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060500c2.html>
May 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/17] (Chemicals case) [QM-wz/wl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060500c3.html>
21 May 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060521c1.html>
June 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/07] (Concentrated fruit juice case) [QM-zx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060600c1.html>
June 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/26] [QM-lwt/jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060600c2.html>
July 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/11] (Granite and marble case) [QM-lj/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060700c1.html>
* 10 July 2006 Shanghai No. 2 Intermediate People's Court [QM-fp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060710c1.html>
25 July 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/22] (Bleached softwood Kraft pulp case) [QM-wz/jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060725c1.html>
3 August 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/15] (Water pump case) [QM-wm/lj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060803c1.html>
August 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/13] (Chilling press case) [QM-zx/fp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060800c1.html>
September 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/08] (Air purifier case) [QM-zx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060900c1.html>
September 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/09] (Apparel case) [QM-zx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060900c2.html>
September 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/10] (Printing machine case) [QM-zx/wm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060900c3.html>
September 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/14] (Spare parts case) [QM-wl/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060900c4.html>
* 18 September 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060918c1.html>
20 September 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [QM-mx/wz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060920c1.html>
November 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/04] [QM-dp/fy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061100c1.html>
* November 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/12] (Monkfish case) [QM-wl/sp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061100c2.html>
December 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/03] [QM-zx/fp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061200c1.html>
December 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/05][QM-wf/sc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061200c2.html>
* December 2006 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2006/19] (Transformer case) [QM-jz/dp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061200c3.html>
* 25 December 2006 Shanghai No. 2 Intermediate People's Court [QM-fy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061225c1.html>
* January 2007 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2007/05] (Business & operation support system case) [QM-jz/dp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070100c1.html>
14 February 2007 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2007/02] (Bellows forming machine case). Arts. 35, 80 [QM-mw/wm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070214c1.html>
23 March 2007 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2007/08] [QM-lwt/jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070323c1.html>
* May 2007 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2007/06] (Hammer mill case) [QM-jz/dp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070500c1.html>
* 17 May 2007 Shanghai Higher People's Court [Appellate Court] (Plastic inflatable swimming pools case) [QM-wl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070517c1.html>
30 June 2007 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2007/04] (Color concrete block production line case) [QM-fh/wm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070630c1.html>
24 July 2007 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2007/07] [QM- xh/fy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070724c1.html>
* 13 August 2007 Xinxiang Intermediate People's Court [QM-fy] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070813c1.html>
October 2007 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2007/03] (CD-R and DVD-R case) [QM-fy/mx] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071000c1.html>
10 December 2007 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG/2007/01][English text] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071210c1.html>
2008 Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court [Xiamen] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080000c1.html>
9 January 2008 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2008/02] [QM-jl/xh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080109c1.html>
18 April 2008 CIETAC Arbitration Award [CISG 2008/01] [QM-jl/xh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080418c1.html>
* 24 April 2008 Zeijiang High People's Court [QM-jl/NYU] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080424c1.html>
25 December 2008 Shanghai First Intermediate People's Court [QM-jl/NYU] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081225c1.html>
* 19 March 2009 Shanghai First Immediate People's Court (Case 1) [QM-jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090319c1.html>
* 19 March 2009 Shanghai First Immediate People's Court (Case 2) [QM-jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090319c2.html>
* 19 March 2009 Shanghai First Immediate People's Court (Case 3) [QM-jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090319c3.html>
* 19 March 2009 Shanghai First Immediate People's Court (Case 4) [QM-jl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090319c4.html>
* 14 October 2010 Hebei High People's Court [Appellate Court] (Sheet glass case) [QM-mw] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/101014c1.html>
* 21 September 2011 Shanghai High People's Court (Electronic equipment case) [QM-mw/mbk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/110921c1.html>
* 29 July 2011 Ningbo Intermediate People's Court (Glass case) [CTN-yw] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/110729c1.html>

COLOMBIA

6 May 2000 Corte Contitucional [QM-pasj/joa] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000510c7.html>

CZECH REPUBLIC

* 29 March 2006 Supreme Court (Carpet case) [QM-sh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060329cz.html>
* 25 June 2008 Supreme Court (Manufactured paint case) [QM-sh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080625cz.html>

DENMARK

22 January 1996 Østre Landsret København [CISG-Denmark website] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960122d1.html>
* 4 November 1998 Randers Byret [QM-tn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981104d1.html>
10 November 1999 Vestre Landsret [CISG-Denmark website] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991110d1.html>
15 February 2001 Supreme Court [CISG-Denmark website] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010215d1.html>
31 January 2002 Maritime Commercial Court [CISG-Denmark website] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020131d1.html>

EGYPT

13 April 1991 Arbitration Award (Cairo Chamber of Commerce & Industry) [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/910413e1.html>
3 October 1995 Arbitration Award (Cairo Chamber of Commerce & Industry) [Link to Unilex case presentation (English translation)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951003e1.html>
16 January 2005 Alexandria Center for International Arbitration <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050116e1.html>

ESTONIA

19 February 2004 Tallinn Circuit Court [CISG-online.ch] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040219e3.html>

FINLAND

5 November 1996 District Court of Kuopio [QM-jv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961105f5.html>
17 January 1997 Tampere Court of First Instance [QM-jv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970117f5.html>
18 February 1997 Turku Court of Appeal [QM-ta] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970218f5.html>
12 November 1997 Turku Court of Appeal [QM-jv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971112f5.html>
29 January 1998 Helsinki Court of Appeal [QM-jv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980129f5.html>
30 June 1998 Helsinki Court of Appeal [QM-jv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980630f5.html>
26 October 2000 Helsinki Court of Appeal [QM-jv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001026f5.html>
12 April 2002 Turku Court of Appeal [QM-jv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020412f5.html>

FRANCE

16 June 1993, Ytong v. Lasaosa, Cour d'appel Grenoble <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930616f1.html>
4 January 1995, Fauba v. Fujitsu, Cour de Cassation <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950104f1.html>
22 February 1995, "BRI Production "Bonaventure" v. Pan African Export, Cour d'appel Grenoble <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950222f1.html>
* 29 March 1995, Cámara Agraria v. André Margaron, Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM-cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950329f1.html>
6 April 1995, Thyssen v. Maaden, Cour d'appel Paris [QM-kkk/cse] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950406f1.html>
19 April 1995, Hughes Electronic v. Souriau Cluses, Cour d'appel Versailles [QM-cs/ah] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950419f1.html>
* 26 April 1995, Enterprise Alain Veyron v. Ambrosio, Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM-cs/ah] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950426f1.html>
* 26 April 1995, Marques Roque Joachim v. La Sarl Holding Manin Rivière, Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM-cs/ah] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950426f2.html>
13 September 1995, Caiato v. S.F.F., Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM-at/ys] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950913f1.html>
* 13 December 1995, ISEA Industrie v. Lu, Cour d'appel Paris [QM-cs/es] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951213f1.html>
* 23 January 1996, Sacovini v. Les fils de Henri Ramel, Cour de Cassation [QM-cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960123f1.html>
15 May 1996, Thermo King v. Cigna Insurance, Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM-cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960515f1.html>
23 October 1996, Scea. Gaec. Des Beauches B. Brino v. Teso Ten Elsen, Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM-kk/to-ks] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961023f1.html>
* 21 November 1996, Schreiber v. Thermo Dynamique, Cour d'appel Aix-en-Provence [translation with <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990526f1.html>]
17 December 1996, Ceramique Culinaire v. Musgrave, Cour de Cassation [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961217f1.html>
* 2 December 1997, Mode jeune diffusion v. Maglificio, Cour de Cassation [QM-cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971202f1.html>
* 18 December 1997, Romay v. Behr France, Tribunal de grande instance Colmar [QM-cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971218f1.html>
14 January 1998 Cour d'appel Paris [QM-ac] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980114f1.html>
* 19 January 1998, Flippe Christian v. Douet Sport Collections, Tribunal de commerce Besançon [QM-cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980119f1.html>
27 January 1998, Hughes v. Société Technocontact, Cour de Cassation [QM-kk/to-ks] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980127f1.html>
29 January 1998, Giustina International v. Perfect Circle Europe, Cour d'appel Versailles [QM-cs/to-ks] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980129f1.html>
* 4 March 1998, Laborall v. Matis, Cour d'appel Paris [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980304f1.html>
* 18 March 1998, Sté Franco-africaine de distribution textile v. More Textilfabrik, Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980318f1.html>
16 July 1998, Les Verreries de Saint Gobain v. Martinswerk, Cour de Cassation <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980716f1.html>
* 5 January 1999, Thermo King v. Cigna Insurance, Cour de Cassation [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990105f1.html>
4 February 1999, Ego Fruits v. La Verja Begastri, Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM-gb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990204f1.html>
26 May 1999, Schreiber v. Thermo Dynamique, Cour de Cassation <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990526f1.html>
* 21 October 1999, Calzados Magnanni v. Shoes General International, Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM-ks] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991021f1.html>
* 17 February 2000 Cour d’appel Rouen [QM-dk/kkk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000217f1.html>
* 12 October 2000 Cour d'appel Paris [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001012f1.html>
* 24 October 2000, SARL Pelliculest v. Morton International, Cour d'appel Colmar [QM-k] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001024f1.html>
* 29 March 2001, TCE Diffusion v. Elettrotecnica Ricci, Cour d'appel Orleans [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010329f1.html>
12 June 2001 Cour d’appel Colmar [QM-sl/jh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010612f1.html>
14 June 2001, Al. & I. Industry v. S.B. Mroiterie, Cour d'appel Paris [QM-ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010614f1.html>
26 June 2001, Huber v. Polyspace, Cour de Cassation [QM-ah] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010626f1.html>
* 26 June 2001, Muller Ecole v. Fedeal Trait, Cour de Cassation [QM-ah/lm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010626f2.html>
26 June 2001, Ogasa v. Madrange, Cour de Cassation [QM-ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010626f3.html>
* 2 October 2001, Lombard v. Cofranca, Cour de Cassation [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011002f1.html>
6 November 2001, Corporate Solutions v. Drahtseilerei, Cour d'appel Paris [QM-pa] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011106f1.html>
* 8 January 2002, Société Coq'in v. Société Polarcup Bénélux BV, Cour de Cassation [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020108f1.html>
19 March 2002 Cour de Cassation [QM-cp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020319f1.html>
* 13 November 2002 Cour d'appel Colmar [QM-mm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021113f1.html>
28 November 2002 Cour d'appel Grenoble [QM-jh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021128f2.html>
* 7 January 2003 Tribunal de commerce Aix-en-Provence [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030107f1.html>
* 10 September 2003 Cour d’appel Paris [QM-mm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030910f1.html>
* 19 September 2003 Cour d’appel Paris [QM-mm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030919f1.html>
* 24 September 2003, Aluminum & Light Industries Company v. St. Bernard Miroiterie Vitretie, Cour de Cassation [QM-lj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030924f1.html>
* 18 December 2003 Cour d'appel Lyon [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031218f1.html>
11 February 2004 Cour de Cassation [QM-jh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040211f1.html>
* 4 June 2004 Cour d'appel Paris [QM-jh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040604f1.html>
* 30 June 2004 Cour de Cassation [QM-jh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040630f1.html>
* 26 October 2004 Cour d'appel Poitiers [QM-jh] http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041026f1.html>
* 4 November 2004 Cour d'appel de Paris [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041104f1.html>
* 23 November 2004 Tribunal de grande instance de Versailles [QM-nh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041123f1.html>
* 25 February 2005 Cour d'appel de Paris [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050225f1.html>
* 1 July 2005 Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050701f1.html>
* 4 October 2005 Cour de Cassation [QM-lg] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051004f1.html>
* 13 October 2005 Cour d'appel de Versailles [QM-av/lt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051013f1.html>
* 25 October 2005 Cour de Cassation [QM-ca/gs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051025f1.html>
19 December 2006 Cour d'appel de Rouen [QM-lt/pk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061219f1.html>
* 22 December 2006 Tribunal de Grande Instance de Strasbourg [QM-cc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061222f1.html>
2007 Arbitration Chamber of Paris Case No. 9926 [ICCA] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/079926f1.html>
* 13 February 2007 Cour de Cassation [QM-cba] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070213f1.html>
13 February 2007 Cour de Cassation [QM-nh/lm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070213f2.html>
20 February 2007 Cour de Cassation [QM-av/ps] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070220f1.html>
5 September 2007 Cour d'appel Agen [QM-lt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases070905f1.html>
* 27 September 2007 Cour d'appel d'Amiens [QM-nh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070927f1.html>
* 15 October 2007 Cour d'appel Bordeaux [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071015f1.html>
26 February 2008 Cour d'appel Colmar [QM-lm/ah] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080226f1.html>
* 2 April 2008 Cour de Cassation [QM-nh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080402f1.html>
* 27 May 2008 Cour d'appel de Rennes [QM-nh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080527f1.html>
16 September 2008 Cour de Cassation [QM-av/lt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080916f1.html>
18 September 2008 Cour d’appel de Lyon (Vehicles case) [QM-] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080918f1.html>
* 3 February 2009 Cour de Cassation [QM-nh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090203f1.html>
26 February 2009 Cour d’appel de Paris (Ship sailing catamaran case) [QM-] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090226f1.html>
* 8 April 2009 Société Bati-Seul v. Société Ceramiche Marca Corona) Cour de cassation [QM-lt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090408f1.html>
7 October 2009 Cour d'appel Paris [QM-pasj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091007f1.html>
* 3 November 2009 Cour de Cassation (Société Anthon GmbH & Co. v. SA Tonnellerie Ludonnaise) [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091103f1.html>
12 March 2010 Medical electronic equipment case Tribunal de commerce Versailles [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100312f1.html>
19 November 2010 Cour d’appel de Paris (Makeup chairs case) [QM-] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/101119f1.html>

GERMANY

24 May 1977 Landgericht Münster [QM-jv/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/770524g1.html>
23 March 1978 Oberlandesgericht Hamm [QM-jv/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/780323g1.html>
24 October 1979 Bundesrichtshof [case commentary with relevant excerpts only] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/791024g1.html>
10 June 1980 Landgericht Essen [QM-jv/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/800610g1.html>
26 June 1980 Oberlandesgericht Hamm [QM-jv/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/800626g1.html>
27 January 1981 Landgericht Heidelberg [QM-jv/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/810127g1.html>
3 June 1983 Landgericht Konstanz [QM-jv/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/830603g1.html>
* 10 December 1986 Bundesgerichtshof [QM-vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/861210g1.html>
5 July 1989 Bundesgerichtshof [QM-vk/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/890705g1.html>
* 28 November 1990 Bundesgerichtshof [QM-vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/901128g1.html>

[These are ULIS cases, not CISG cases:
For the rationale, go to the Editorial remarks section of the
Case presentation for 6 October 1992 Landgericht Berlin.]

* 3 July 1989 Landgericht München <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/890703g1.html>
* 31 August 1989 Landgericht Stuttgart <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/890831g1.html>
* 24 April 1990 Amtsgericht Oldenburg [QM-jh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/900424g1.html>
26 September 1990 Landgericht Hamburg [QM-ca/sk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/900926g1.html>
* 21 December 1990 Amtsgericht Ludwigsburg [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/901221g1.html>
31 January 1991 Amtsgericht Frankfurt [QM-ca/sk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/910131g1.html>
* 13 August 1991 Landgericht Stuttgart [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/910813g1.html>
14 August 1991 Landgericht Baden-Baden <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/910814g1.html>
* 16 September 1991 Landgericht Frankfurt [QM-sk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/910916g1.html>
17 September 1991 Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/910917g1.html>
* 27 September 1991 Oberlandesgericht Koblenz [QM-sk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/910927g1.html>
* 2 July 1992 Landgericht Heidelberg [QM-sk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/920703g1.html>
22 September 1992 Oberlandesgericht Hamm [QM-sh/av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/920922g1.html>
30 September 1992 Landgericht Berlin [QM-ta/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/920930g1.html>
6 October 1992 Landgericht Berlin [QM-jv/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/921006g1.html>
* 14 October 1992 Amtsgericht Zweibrücken [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/921014g1.html>
* 20 November 1992 Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/921120g1.html>
* 24 November 1992 Landgericht Krefeld [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/921124g1.html>
8 January 1993 Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf [A&B] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930108g1.html>
* 13 January 1993 Oberlandesgericht Saarbrücken [QM-sh/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930113g1.html>
* 12 March 1993 Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf [QM-ks] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930312g1.html>
* 14 April 1993 Amtsgericht Cloppenburg [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930414g1.html>
* 14 May 1993 Landgericht Aachen [QM-sh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930514g1.html>
2 July 1993 Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930702g1.html>
* 17 September 1993 Oberlandesgericht Koblenz [QM-ks] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930917g1.html>
14 January 1994 Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940114g1.html>
18 January 1994 Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt [JL&C] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940118g1.html>
* 24 January 1994 Kammergericht Berlin [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940124g1.html>
10 February 1994 Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf, 6 U 32/93 [Alston&Bird] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940210g1.html>
10 February 1994 Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf, 6 U 119/93 [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940210g2.html>
22 February 1994 Oberlandesgericht Köln <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940222g1.html>
* 2 March 1994 Oberlandesgerich München [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940302g1.html>
4 March 1994 Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt [QM-pf/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940304g1.html>
4 May 1994 Amtsgericht [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940504g1.html>
* 14 June 1994 Amtsgerich Nordhorn [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940614g1.html>
23 June 1994 Landgericht Düsseldorf [QM-pf/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940623g1.html>
* 25 August 1994 Landgericht Düsseldorf [QM-ta] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940825g1.html>
26 August 1994 Oberlandesgericht Köln [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940826g1.html>
15 September 1994 Landgericht Berlin [QM-me/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940915g1.html>
21 October 1994 Amtsgerich Riedlingen [QM-pf/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941021g1.html>
9 November 1994 Landgericht Oldenburg [QM-pf/tj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941109g1.html>
1 February 1995 Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg [QM-pf/tj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950201g1.html>
8 February 1995 Oberlandesgericht München [7 U 1720/94] [QM-ca/sk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950208g1.html>
* 8 February 1995 Oberlandesgericht München [7 U 3758/94] [QM-jh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950208g2.html>
* 8 February 1995 Oberlandesgericht Hamm [QM-df] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950208g3.html>
8 February 1995 Landgericht München [QM-pf/tj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950208g4.html>
15 February 1995 Bundesgerichtshof [Alston&Bird] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950215g1.html>
8 March 1995 Oberlandesgericht München [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950308g1.html>
8 March 1995 Bundesgerichtshof [Alston&Bird] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950308g3.html>
* 8 March 1995 Amtsgericht Wangen [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950308g2.html>
20 March 1995 Landgericht München [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950320g1.html>
31 March 1995 Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt [QM-pf/cn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950331g1.html>
5 April 1995 Landgericht Landshut [QM-pf/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950405g1.html>
* 2 May 1995 Amtsgericht Bayreuth [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950502g3.html>
* 12 May 1995 Amtsgericht Alsfeld [QM-fa] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950512g1.html>
23 May 1995 Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950523g1.html>
* 24 May 1995 Oberlandesgericht Celle [QM-ac] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950524g1.html>
* 29 May 1995 Landgericht München [QM-ta] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950529g1.html>
9 June 1995 Oberlandesgericht Hamm [Alston&Bird] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950609g1.html>
* 22 June 1995 Landgericht Kassel [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950622g1.html>
* 23 June 1995 Amtsgericht München [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950623g1.html>
5 July 1995 Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt [QM-pf/cn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950705g1.html>
20 July 1995 Landgericht Aachen [QM-pf/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950720g1.html>
* 27 July 1995 Oberlandesgericht Rostock [QM-pf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950727g1.html>
21 August 1995 Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart [Alston&Bird] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950821g1.html>
21 August 1995 Landgericht Elwangen [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950821g2.html>
21 September 1995 Landgericht Kassel [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950921g1.html>
6 October 1995 Amstergericht Kehl [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951006g1.html>
11 October 1995 Landgericht Düsseldorf [QM-pf/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951011g1.html>
12 October 1995 Landgericht Trier [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951012g1.html>
* 12 December 1995 Landgericht Marburg [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951212g1.html>
24 January 1996 Landgericht Bochum [QM-nh/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960124g1.html>
* 25 January 1996 Landgericht München [QM-jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960125g1.html>
* 29 January 1996 Amtsgericht Augsburg [QM-sh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960129g1.html>
* 15 February 1996 Landgericht Kassel [11 O 4185/95] [QM-sh/jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960215g1.html>
* 15 February 1996 Landgericht Kassel [11 O 4187/95] [QM-sk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960215g2.html>
* 28 February 1996 Landgericht Oldenburg [QM-vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960228g1.html>
21 March 1996 Hamburg Arbitration [ICCA] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960321g1.html
* 26 March 1996 Landgericht Saarbrücken [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960326g1.html>
27 March 1996 Landgericht Oldenburg [QM-sh/av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960327g1.html>
3 April 1996 Bundesgerichtshof [QM-pf/rm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960403g1.html>
17 April 1996 Landgericht Duisburg [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960417g1.html>
21 May 1996 Oberlandesgericht Köln [QM-pf/cn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960521g1.html>
* 17 June 1996 Landgericht Hamburg [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960617g1.html>
21 June 1996 Hamburg Arbitration [ICCA] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960621g1.html>
25 June 1996 Landgericht Paderborn [QM-jv/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960625g1.html>
* 11 July 1996 Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf [QM-ks] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960711g1.html>
2 August 1996 Landgericht Bielefeld [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960802g1.html>
30 August 1996 Hamburg Arbitration [ICCA] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960830g1.html>
4 September 1996 Hamburg Arbitration [excerpt] [ICCA] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960904g1.html>
12 November 1996 Amstergericht Koblenz [QM-jv/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961112g1.html>
4 December 1996 Bundesgerichtshof [Alston&Bird] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961204g1.html>
* 11 December 1996 Bundesgerichtshof [QM-tt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961211g1.html>
* 8 January 1997 Oberlandesgericht Köln [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970108g1.html>
* 31 January 1997 Oberlandesgericht Koblenz [QM-vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970131g1.html>
* 28 February 1997 Oberlandesgericht Hamburg [QM-lm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970228g1.html>
* 13 March 1997 Amtsgericht Berlin-Tiergarten [QM-df] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970313g1.html>
* 24 April 1997 Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf [QM-jw] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970424g1.html>
25 June 1997 Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970625g1.html>
25 June 1997 Bundesgerichtshof [QM-bk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970625g2.html>
* 4 July 1997 Oberlandesgericht Hamburg [QM-jw] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970704g1.html>
* 9 July 1997 OLG München (7 U 2070/97) [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970709g1.html>
9 July 1997 OLG München (7 U 2246/97) [QM-tk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970709g2.html>
* 9 July 1997 OLG Köln [QM-tk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970709g3.html>
23 July 1997 Bundesgerichtshof, VIII ZR 134/90 [QM-ai/rj <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970723g2.html>
* 21 August 1997 OLG Köln [QM-jw] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970821g1.html>
15 September 1997 Landgericht Heilbronn [QM-ca/fh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970915g1.html>
* 15 October 1997 Landgericht Hagen [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971015g1.html>
5 November 1997 OLG Hamm [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971105g1.html>
* 21 January 1998 Oberlandesgericht München [QM-vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980121g1.html>
28 January 1998 OLG München [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980128g1.html>
12 February 1998 Bundesgerichtshof [QM-me/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980212g1.html>
* 11 March 1998 Oberlandesgericht München [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980311g1.html>
* 24 March 1998 Landgericht Berlin [QM-jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980324g1.html>
* 31 March 1998 Oberlandesgericht Zweibrücken [QM-vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980331g1.html>
* 26 May 1998 Oberlandesgericht Thüringer [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980526g1.html>
3 June 1998 Oberlandesgericht Saarbrücken [QM-tf/lm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980603g1.html>
23 June 1998 Oberlandesgericht Hamm [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980623g1.html>
9 July 1998 Oberlandesgericht Dresden [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980709g1.html>
29 July 1998 LG Erfurt [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980729g1.html>
2 September 1998 OLG Celle [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980902g1.html>
* 11 September 1998 Oberlandesgericht Koblenz [QM-tf/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980911g1.html>
22 September 1998 Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980922g1.html>
24 September 1998 Landgericht Regensburg [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980924g1.html>
5 October 1998 Oberlandesgericht Hamburg [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981005g1.html>
* 15 November 1998 Landgericht Karlsruhe [QM-jw] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981115g1.html>
24 November 1998 Landgericht Bielefeld [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981124g1.html>
25 November 1998 Bundesgerichtshof [QM-tf/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981125g1.html>
* 26 November 1998 Landgericht Mainz [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases//981126g1.html>
29 December 1998 Hamburg Arbitration [QM-tf/lm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981229g1.html>
13 January 1999 OLG Bamberg [QM-rj/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990113g1.html>
24 March 1999 Bundesgerichtshof [Alston&Bird] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990324g1.html>
24 March 1999 Landgericht Flensburg [QM-rj/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990324g2.html>
16 April 1999 Landgericht Bonn [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990416g1.html>
25 May 1999 Landgericht Berlin [QM-ca/dk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990525g1.html>
27 April 1999 Oberlandesgericht Naumburg [QM-jv/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990427g1.html>
28 October 1999 Oberlandesgericht Braunschweig [QM-jv/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991028g1.html>
3 November 1999 Bundesgerichtshof [Alston&Bird] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991103g1.html>
26 November 1999 Oberlandesgericht Hamburg [QM-ar/lm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991126g1.html>
* 30 November 1999 Landgericht Köln [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991130g1.html>
3 December 1999 Oberlandesgericht München [QM-us/lm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991203g1.html>
27 December 1999 Oberlandesgericht Dresden [QM-ca/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991227g1.html>
26 January 2000 Oberlandesgericht Hamburg [QM-rj/jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000126g1.html>
28 February 2000 Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart [QM-rj/vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000228g1.html>
6 April 2000 Landgericht München [QM-sk/rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000406g1.html>
13 April 2000 Amtsgericht Duisburg [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000413g1.html>
28 April 2000 Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg [QM-lm/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000428g1.html>
9 May 2000 LG Darmstadt [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000509g1.html>
30 August 2000 Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000830g1.html>
13 September 2000 Landgericht Memmingen [QM-jb/vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000913g1.html>
12 October 2000 Landgericht Stendal [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001012g1.html>
* 23 October 2000 Oberlandesgericht Dresden [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001023g1.html>
13 November 2000 Oberlandesgericht Köln [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001113g1.html>
16 November 2000 Landgericht München [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001116g1.html>
5 December 2000 Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg [QM-dk/jw/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001205g1.html>
19 January 2001 Landgericht Flensburg [QM-ca/sk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010119g1.html>
31 January 2001 Landgericht Hamburg [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010131g1.html>
14 February 2001 Oberlandesgericht Saarbrücken [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010214g1.html>
12 March 2001 Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart [QM-rj/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010312g1.html>
29 March 2001 Landgericht Trier [QM-tk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010329g1.html>
28 May 2001 Oberlandesgericht Köln [QM-jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010528g1.html>
29 May 2001 Landgericht Darmstadt [QM-av/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010529g1.html>
28 June 2001 Landgericht Trier [QM-tk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010628g1.html>
16 July 2001 Oberlandesgericht Köln [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010716g1.html>
30 July 2001 Landgericht Braunsweig [QM-dk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010730g1.html>
30 August 2001 Landgericht München [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010830g1.html>
10 October 2001 Oberlandesgericht Rostock [QM-lm/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011010g1.html>
31 October 2001 Bundesgerichtshof [Alston & Bird] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011031g1.html>
12 November 2001 Oberlandesgericht Hamm [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011112g1.html>
29 November 2001 Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe [QM-vk/jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011129g1.html>
21 December 2001 Landgericht Hamburg [QM-sk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011221g1.html>
9 January 2002 Bundesgerichtshof [Alston & Bird] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020109g1.html>
20 February 2002 Landgericht München [QM-jw/mb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020220g1.html>
27 February 2002 Landgericht München [QM-sk/cba] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020227g1.html>
11 April 2002 Amtsgericht Viechtach [QM-rj/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020411g1.html>
* 26 April 2002 Landgericht Freiburg [QM-ks] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020426g1.html>
4 June 2002 Landgericht Stuttgart [QM-md/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020604g1.html>
1 July 2002 Oberlandesgericht München [QM-rj/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020701g1.html>
2 July 2002 Landgericht Saarbrücken [QM-jw] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020702g1.html>
26 July 2002 Oberlandesgericht Zweibrücken [QM-jw/mb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020726g1.html>
22 August 2002 Landgericht Freiburg [QM-vk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020822g1.html>
22 August 2002 Oberlandesgericht Schleswig [QM-sk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020822g2.html>
20 September 2002 Landgericht Göttingen [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020920g1.html>
25 September 2002 Oberlandesgericht Rostock [QM-rj/vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020925g1.html>
4 October 2002 Oberlandesgericht Koblenz [QM-dk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021004g1.html>
14 October 2002 Oberlandesgericht Köln [QM-tk/cn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021014g1.html>
29 October 2002 Oberlandesgericht Schleswig-Holstein [QM-jh/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021029g1.html>
13 November 2002 Oberlandesgericht München [QM-ul/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021113g1.html>
25 November 2002 LG Saarbrücken [QM-av/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021125g1.html>
17 December 2002 Landgericht Giessen [QM-ds/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021217g1.html>
19 December 2002 Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe [QM-vk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021219g1.html>
* 6 March 2003 Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe [QM-vk/je] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030306g1.html>
21 March 2003 Landgericht Berlin [QM-sk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030321g1.html>
25 March 2003 Landgericht Köln [QM-tt/jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030325g1.html>
* 30 April 2003 Bundesgerichtshof [QM-sk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030430g1.html>
* 11 June 2003 Landgericht Hannover [QM-tk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030611g1.html>
11 June 2003 Landgericht Hamburg [QM-sd/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030611g2.html>
18 June 2003 LG Tübingen [QM-av/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030618g1.html>
15 July 2003 LG Mönchengladbach [QM-ec/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030715g1.html>
25 July 2003 Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf [QM-md/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030725g1.html>
15 August 2003 Landgericht Bielefeld [QM-sd/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030815g1.html>
* 28 August 2003 Landgericht Düsseldorf [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030828g1.html>
15 September 2003 Oberlandesgericht Rostock [QM-sh/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030915g1.html>
27 October 2003 Oberlandesgericht Rostock [QM-fs/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031027g1.html>
26 November 2003 Landgericht Hamburg [QM-sk/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031126g1.html>
10 December 2003 Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe [QM-tk/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031210g1.html>
12 December 2003 Landgericht Bielefeld [QM-lm/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031212g1.html>
8 January 2004 Landgericht Trier [QM-vk/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040108g1.html>
23 January 2004 Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf [QM-tf/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040123g1.html>
* 29 January 2004 Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt [QM-lm/ah] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040129g1.html>
30 January 2004 Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf [QM-re/jh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040130g1.html>
2 February 2004 Oberlandesgericht Zweibrücken [QM-jh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040202g1.html>
10 March 2004 Oberlandesgericht Celle [QM-tk/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040310g1.html>
21 April 2004 Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf [15 U 8803] [QM-jh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040421g3.html>
28 May 2004 Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf [QM-tk/jh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040528g1.html>
1 June 2004 Landgericht Saarbrücken [QM-md/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040601g1.html>
30 June 2004 Bundesgerichtshof [Alston & Bird] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040630g1.html>
20 July 2004 Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe [QM-sd/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040720g1.html>
22 July 2004 Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040722g1.html>
27 July 2004 Landgericht Keil [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040727g1.html>
6 September 2004 Landgericht Hamburg [QM-sd/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040906g1.html>
15 September 2004 Oberlandesgericht München [QM-md/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040915g2.html>
6 October 2004 Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt [QM-vk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041006g1.html>
26 October 2004 Landgericht Saarbrücken [QM-lm/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041026g1.html>
* 10 December 2004 Landgericht Bayreuth [QM-jb/je] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041210g1.html>
20 December 2004 Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart [QM-df/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041220g1.html>
2 March 2005 Bundesgerichtshof [A&B] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050302g1.html>
11 April 2005 Landgericht Frankfurt [QM-lm/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050411g1.html>
13 April 2005 Landgericht Bamberg [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050413g1.html>
13 May 2005 Landgericht Freiburg [QM-sd/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050513g1.html>
3 August 2005 Landgericht Neubrandenburg [QM-md/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050803g1.html>
18 October 2005 Oberlandesgericht Bamberg [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051018g1.html>
2 November 2005 Landgericht Heidelberg [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051102g1.html>
29 November 2005 Landgericht München [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051129g1.html>
6 December 2005 Oberlandesgericht Hamm [QM-sd/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051206g1.html>
21 December 2005 Oberlandesgericht Köln [QM-sd/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051221g1.html>
11 January 2006 Bundesgerichtshof [Alston & Bird] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060111g1.html>
8 February 2006 Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060208g1.html>
13 February 2006 Oberlandesgericht Köln [QM-sd/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060213g1.html>
3 April 2006 Oberlandesgericht Köln [QM-sd/ca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060403g1.html>
20 April 2006 Landgericht Aschaffenburg [QM-vk/fa] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060420g1.html>
* 15 May 2006 Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060515g1.html>
24 May 2006 Oberlandesgericht Köln [QM-ta/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060524g1.html>
21 June 2006 Amtsgericht Landsberg [QM-vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060621g1.html>
26 June 2006 Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060626g1.html>
29 June 2006 Landgericht Gera [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060629g1.html>
17 August 2006 Oberlandesgericht Köln [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060817g1.html>
31 August 2006 Oberlandesgericht Köln [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060831g1.html>
13 September 2006 Landgericht Berlin [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060913g1.html>
20 September 2006 Landgericht Krefeld [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060920g1.html>
29 September 2006 Landgericht Hof [QM-vk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060929g1.html>
19 October 2006 Oberlandesgericht Koblenz [QM-vk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061019g2.html>
19 October 2006 Oberlandesgericht München [QM-ks/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061019g1.html>
23 October 2006 Landgericht Bamberg [QM-jb/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061023g1.html>
* 10 November 2006 Oberlandesgericht Dresden [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061110g1.html>
17 November 2006 Oberlandesgericht München [QM-sk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061117g1.html>
5 December 2006 Landgericht Köln [QM-fa/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061205g1.html>
12 December 2006 Langericht Coburg [QM-fa/vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061212g1.html>
14 December 2006 Oberlandesgericht Koblenz [QM-vk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061214g1.html>
12 January 2007 Oberlandesgericht Köln [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070112g1.html>
17 January 2007 Oberlandesgericht Saarbrücken [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070117g1.html>
21 March 2007 Oberlandesgericht Dresden [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070321g1.html>
11 June 2007 Oberlandesgericht Dresden [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070611g1.html>
* 6 July 2007 Amtsgericht Freiburg [QM-df] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070706g1.html>
* 8 November 2007 Oberlandesgericht Dresden [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071108g1.html>
21 November 2007 Oberlandesgericht Koblenz [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071121g1.html>
27 November 2007 Bundesgerichtshof [Alston & Bird] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071127g1.html>
* 20 December 2007 Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071220g1.html>
14 January 2008 Oberlandesgericht Köln [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080114g1.html>
25 January 2008 Oberlandesgericht Hamburg [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080125g1.html>
14 February 2008 Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080214g1.html>
5 March 2008 Oberlandesricht München [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080305g1.html>
31 March 2008 Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080331g1.html>
19 May 2008 Oberlandesgericht Köln [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080519g1.html>
12 June 2008 Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080612g1.html>
12 June 2008 Landgericht Landshut [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080612g2.html>
9 July 2008 Bundesgerichtshof [Birgit Kurtz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080709g1.html>
24 October 2008 Oberlandesgericht Schleswig [QM-av/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081024g1.html>
* 18 November 2008 Oberlandesgericht Brandenburg [QM-jhb/sk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081118g1.html>
14 January 2009 Oberlandesgericht München [QM-av/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090114g1.html>
17 February 2009 Landsgericht Hamburg [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090217g1.html>
2 April 2009 Oberlandesgericht Hamm [QM-fa] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090402g1.html>
* 7 April 2009 Landgericht Potsdam [QM-vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090407g1.html>
18 May 2009 Landsgericht München [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090518g1.html>
* 24 July 2009 Oberlandesgericht Celle [QM-vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090724g1.html>
12 October 2009 Oberlandesgericht München 12 October 2009 [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091012g1.html>
15 October 2009 Landgericht Stuttgart [QM-av/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091015g1.html>
29 October 2009 Landgericht Stuttgart (Artificial turf case) [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091029g1.html>
* 11 November 2009 Landgericht Stuttgart [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091111g1.html>
* 1 March 2010 OLG Koblenz [2 U 816/09] (Asphalt mixing unit case) [QM-oj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100301g1.html>
* 15 July 2010 Appellate Court Hamburg [CTN-cs] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100715g1.html>
* 29 May 2012 District Court Köln [CTN-nh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/120529g1.html>
* 26 September 2012 Supreme Court (Clay case) [CTN-nh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/120926g1.html>
* 13 February 2013 Appellate Court Naumburg (Cereal case) [CTN-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/130213g1.html>
* 14 May 2014 Federal Supreme Court [CTN-we] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/140514g1.html>
* 28 May 2014 Federal Supreme Court [CTN-we] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/140528g1.html>

HUNGARY

* 1992 Fovarosi Birosag [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/920000h1.html>
10 January 1992, United Technologies v. Malev, Fovarosi Birosag <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/920110h1.html>
25 September 1992, United Technologies v. Malev, Legfelsobb Birosag <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/920925h1.html>
20 December 1993 Budapest Arbitration [QM-mp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/931220h1.html>
* 5 December 1995 Budapest Arbitration [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951205h1.html>
10 December 1996 Budapest Arbitration <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961210h1.html>
* 1 July 1997 Fovarasi Birosag [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970701h1.html>
2000 Budapest Arbitration proceeding [QM-av/ts] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000000h1.html>
2000 Legfelsobb Birosag [Supreme Court] [QM-ts/av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000000h2.html>
2003 Szegedi Itelotabla [Appellate Court] [QM-ts/av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030000h1.html>
* 6 June 2007 Congrád County Court (Clothing case) [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070606h1.html>
* 22 November 2007 Judicial Board of Szeged [Appellate Court] (Clothing case) [QM-av/vv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071122h1.html>
* 5 December 2008 Judicial Board of Szeged [Appellate Court] (Wine case) [QM-av/vv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081205h1.html>

INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE COURT OF ARBITRATION

ICC Arbitration No. 5713 of 1989 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/895713i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 6281 of 1989 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/896281i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 7153 of 1992 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/927153i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 7585 of 1992 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/927585i1.html>
* ICC Arbitration No. 6653 of 1993 [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/936653i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 7399 of 1993 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/937399i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 7331 of 1994 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/947331i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 7531 of 1994 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/947531i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 7565 of 1994 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/947565i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 7754 of January 1995 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/957754i1.html>
* ICC Arbitration No. 8128 of 1995 [QM-dk/sl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/958128i1.html>
* ICC Arbitration No. 8324 of 1995 [QM-jh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/958324i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 7645 of March 1995 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/957645i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 8213 of March 1995 [case digest] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/958213i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 8453 of October 1995 [case digest] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/958453i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 8247 of June 1996 [case digest] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/968247i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 8574 of September 1996 [case digest] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/968574i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 8740 of October 1996 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/968740i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 8502 of November 1996 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/968502i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 8482 of December 1996 [case digest] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/968482i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 8769 of December 1996 [case digest] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/968769i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 8611 of 23 January 1997 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/978611i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 8786 of January 1997 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/978786i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 8644 of 1 April 1997 [Link to CISG-online.ch case presentation] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/978644i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 8962 of September 1997 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/978962i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 8817 of December 1997 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/978817i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 9117 of March 1998 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/989117i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 9574 of August 1998 [case digest] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/989574i1.html>
* ICC Arbitration No. 9333 of October 1998 [QM-dk/ks] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/989333i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 8908 of December 1998 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/988908i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 8547 of 1999 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/998547i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 10274 of 1999 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990274i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 9978 of March 1999 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/999978i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 9187 of June 1999 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/999187i1.html> [excerpt]
ICC Arbitration No. 9448 of July 1999 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/999448i1.html> [excerpt]
ICC Arbitration No. 9083 of August 1999 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/999083i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 9887 of August 1999 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/999887i1.html> [excerpt]
ICC Arbitration of 20 December 1999 [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991220i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 8790 of 2000 [ICCA] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/008790i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 9781 of 2000 [ICCA] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/009781i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 10329 of 2000 [ICCA] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000329i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 10377 of 2002 [ICCA] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020377i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 11333 of 2002 [ICCA] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021333i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 11849 of 2003 [ICCA] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031849i1.html>
ICC Arbitration No. 12173 [ICCA] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/0412173i1.html>

IRAN / US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL

28 July 1989 Case No. 370 (429-370-1), Watkins Johnson v. Islamic Republic of Iran [Link to Unilex case presentation (English Text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/890728i2.html>

ISRAEL

2 November 1988, Adras v. Harlow & Jones, Supreme Court [relevant excerpts only] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/881102i5.html>
22 August 1993, Examin v. Textile and Footwear, Supreme Court <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930822i5.html>
17 March 2009 Pamesa Ceramica v. Yisrael Mendelson Ltd, Supreme Court <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090317i5.html>

ITALY

24 November 1989, Foliopack v. Daniplast, Pretura circondariale di Parma [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/891124i3.html>
19 November 1992 Corte Costituzionale [QM-ab/gm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/921119i3.html>
14 January 1993, Nuova Fucinati v. Fondmetall, Tribunale Civile di Monza <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930114i3.html>
19 April 1994 Florence Arbitration proceeding [QM-ao]<http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940419i3.html>
24 March 1995, Marc Rich v. Iritecna, Corte di Appello di Genova [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950324i3.html>
9 June 1995, Alfred Dunhill v. Tivoli Group, Corte di Cassazione [QM-id/gm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950609i3.html>
31 January 1996, Sport d'Hiver v. Louys et Fils, Tribunale Civile di Cuneo <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960131i3.html>
30 January 1997, C & M v. Bankintzopoulos, Pretura di Torino <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970130i3.html>
20 March 1998, Italdecor v. Yiu's Industries (H.K.), Corte di Appello di Milano [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980320i3.html>
7 August 1998, Ariotti v. Zimm, Corte di Cassazione [QM-ca/ao] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980807i3.html>
11 December 1998, Bielloni Castello v. EGO, Corte di Appello di Milano [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981211i3.html>
14 December 1999, Imperial Bathroom v. Sanitari Pozzi, Corte di Cassazione [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991214i3.html>
29 December 1999, Tessile 21 v. Ixela, Tribunale di Pavia [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991229i3.html>
19 June 2000, Premier Steel Service v. Oscam S.p.A., Corte di Cassazione [QM-fm/gm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000619i3.html>
3 July 2000 Tribunale di Reggio Emilia [QM-jg/fm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000703i3.html>
12 July 2000 Tribunale di Vigevano [JL & C] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000712i3.html>
23 January 2001 Corte di Appello Milano [QM-ab/gm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010123i3.html>
28 September 2001 Milan Arbitration proceeding [English text] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010928i3.html>
24 November 2001 Tribunale di Modena [QM-fb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011124i3.html>
13 December 2001 Tribunale di Busto Arsizio [QM-mp/pm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011213i3.html>
* 6 June 2002 Corte di Cassazione [Supreme Court] (Jazbinsek GmbH v. Piberplast S.p.A.) [QM-gm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020606i3.html>
26 November 2002 Tribunale di Rimini [QM-ar] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021126i3.html>
25 February 2004 Tribunale di Padova [QM-gm/jg] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040225i3.html>
31 March 2004 Tribunale di Padova [QM-jg/fm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040331i3.html>
28 August 2004 Tribunale di Rovereto [QM-fm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040828i3.html>
* 20 September 2004 Corte Suprema di Cassazione [QM-df/mz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040920i3.html>
* 11 January 2005 Tribunale Padova [QM-pe] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050111i3.html>
9 December 2005 Tribunale di Modena [QM-fb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051209i3.html>
* 10 January 2006 Tribunale Padova [QM-fm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060110i3.html>
27 September 2006 Court Suprema di Cassazione [QM-fb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060927i3.html>
* 3 January 2007 Corte Suprema di Cassazione [Supreme Court] (Bourjois S.A.S. v. Gommatex Poliuretani S.p.A.) [QM-gm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020606i3.html>
21 November 2007 Tribunale [District Court] Rovereto (Takap B.V. v. Europlay S.r.l.) [QM-mp/pm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071121i3.html>
11 December 2008 Tribunale di Forli [QM-pe/rp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081211i3.html>
* 29 January 2009 Tribunale di Bolzano [QM-gm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090129i3.html>
16 February 2009 Tribunale di Forli [QM-pe/rp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090216i3.html>
12 April 2011 Tr di Reggio Emilia [N.505/2010 R.G.] (Ceramic case) [QM-mp/pm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/110412i3.html>

MEXICO

4 May 1993, Morales v. Nez Marketing, Compromex Arbitration <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930504m1.html>
29 April 1996, Costeña v. Lanin, Compromex Arbitration <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960429m1.html>
30 November 1998, Dulces Luisi v. Seoul International, Compromex Arbitration <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981130m1.html>
14 July 2000 Civil Court of First Instance, Tijuana <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000714m1.html>
5 October 2004 Kolmar case Court of First Instance [QM-dr] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041005m1.html>
* 10 March 2005 Primer Tribunal Colegiado [QM-aca/ao] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050310m1.html>
30 August 2005 Civil Court of First InstanceTijuana [QM-ao] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050830m1.html>
24 March 2006 Superior Court of Baja California [QM-ao] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060000m1.html>
26 May 2005 Amparo proceeding No. 292/2005 [QM-dla] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050526m1.html>
26 May 2005 Amparo proceeding No. 293/2005 [QM-dla] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050526m2.html>
3 October 2006 Juzgado Primero Civil de Primera Instancia de Lerma de Villada [QM-aca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061003m1.html>
* 27 February 2008 Amparo Directo Tribunal [CTN-pasj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080227m1.html>

MONTENEGRO

* 20 February 2007 Appellate Court [AS] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070220mo.html>

NETHERLANDS

5 January 1978, Amram v. Tesa, Gerichtshof Amsterdam <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/780105n1.html>
* 21 May 1996, Maglificio v. Wehkamp, Gerechtshof Arnem [QM-ak] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960521n1.html>
29 May 1997, Aartsem v/Suykens, Arrondissementsrechtbank Zutphen [QM-ys] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970529n1.html>
17 July 1997, Kunsthaus Math. Lempertz v. Wilhelmina van der Geld, Arrondissementsrechtbank [QM-ys] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970717n1.html>
7 November 1997, J.T. Schuermans v. Boomsma, Hoge Raad [QM-ys] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971107n1.html>
* 2 October 1998, Malaysia Dairy Industries v. Dairex Holland, Arrondissementsrechtbank'- Hertogenbosch [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981002n1.html>
* 27 April 1999, Mainzer Raumzellen v. Van Keulen, Gerichtshof Arnem [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990427n1.html>
* 14 October 1999, Arrondissementsrechtbank Rotterdam [QM-ys] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991014n1.html>
20 January 2000, Arrondissementsrechtbank Rotterdam [QM-ys] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000120n1.html>
* 12 July 2001 Arrondissementsrechtbank Rotterdam, Hispafruit BV v. Amuyen S.A. [QM-ev] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010712n1.html>
15 October 2002 Netherlands Arbitration Institute Case No. 2319 [English text] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021015n1.html>
* 16 October 2002 Gerechtshof 's-Hertogenbosch [QM-pb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021016n1.html>
22 January 2003 Arrondissementsrechtbank Zwolle [QM-bv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030122n1.html>
29 January 2003 Arrondissementsrechtbank Zwolle [QM-aa] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030129n1.html>
* 23 April 2003 Gerechtshof 's-Gravenhage [QM-pb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030423n1.html>
27 January 2004 Gerechtshof 's-Hertogenbosch [QM-bv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040127n1.html>
* 17 March 2004 Arrondissementsrechtbank Arnhem [QM-ca/vm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040317n1.html>
27 July 2004 Gerchtshof Arnhem, Saccordo Motori S.r.l v. Meijo Elektro Holland B.V. [QM-ev] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040727n1.html>
28 January 2005 Hoge Raad [QM-pb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050128n1.html>
10 February 2005 Netherlands Arbitration Institute (interim award) [English text] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050210n1.html>
17 May 2005 Netherlands Arbitration Institute [ICCA] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050517n1.html>
* 31 August 2005 Gerechtshof Leeuwarden [QM-tt/pb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050831n1.html>
* 1 March 2006 Rechtbank Arnhem [QM-tt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060301n1.html>
* 28 June 2006 Rechtbank [QM-tt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060628n1.html>
18 July 2006 Gerechtshof Arnhem [QM-tt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060718n1.html>
* 19 July 2006 Rechtbank Arnhem [QM-tt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060719n1.html>
2 January 2007 Gerechtshof 's-Hertogenbosch [QM-pb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070102n1.html>
* 17 January 2007 Rechtbank Arnhem [QM-tt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070117n1.html>
* 29 May 2007 Gerechgshof 's-Hertogenbosch [QM-tt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070529n1.html>
* 18 July 2007 Rechtbank Utrecht [QM-tt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070718n1.html>
* 9 July 2008 Rechtbank Maastricht [QM-tt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080709n1.html>
* 7 October 2008 Gerechtshof Arnhem [QM-tt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081007n1.html>
15 October 2008 Rechtbank [District Court] Rotterdam [QM-ah] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081015n2.html>
15 October 2008 Rechtbank Rotterdam [QM-lh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081015n1.html>
5 November 2008 Rechtbank Arnhem [QM-lh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081105n1.html>
* 16 January 2009 Rechtbank Breda [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090116n1.html>
* 21 January 2009 Rechtbank Utrecht [QM-tvh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090121n1.html>
* 11 February 2009 Rechtbank Arnhem [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090211n1.html>
* 25 February 2009 Rechtbank Rotterdam [QM-ah] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090225n1.html>
3 June 2009 Rechtbank Amsterdam [QM-sk/Thomas] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090603n1.html>
* 8 July 2009 District Court 's-Gravenhage [CTN-jcch] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090708n1.html>
29 July 2009 Rechtbank Arnhem [QM-tt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090729n1.html>
19 August 2009 Rechtbank Amsterdam [QM-sk/Thomas] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090819n1.html>
9 December 2009 Rechtbank Zwolle [QM-sk/Anne] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091209n1.html>
16 December 2009 Rechtbank Arnhem [QM-sk/Anne] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091216n1.html>
23 December 2009 Rechtbank Rotterdam [QM-ah] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091223n1.html>
19 January 1010 Gerechtshof Arnhem [QM-sk/Thomas] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100119n1.html>
28 January 2010 Gerechstof [Appellate court] Arnhem [QM-ah] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100128n1.html>
* 22 April 2014 [Appellate Court] The Hague [CTN-ts] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/140422n1.html>
* 9 March 2010 Gerechtshof [Appellate Court] [CTN-jcch] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100309n1.html>

NEW ZEALAND

19 December 1996, Attorney General v. Dreux, Court of Appeal <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961219n6.html>
27 November 2000, Hideo Yoshimoto v. Canerbury Golf International, Court of Appeal <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001127n6.html> [excerpt]
3 October 2001, Bobux Marketing Ltd v. Raynor Marketing Ltd, Court of Appeal <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011003n6.html> [excerpt]
27 March 2002, Thompson v Cameron, High Court, Auckland <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020327n6.html>
31 March 2003, International Housewares v SEB, High Court, Auckland <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030331n6.html>
22 July 2011, RJ & AM Smallmon v. Transport Sales Limited and Grant Alan Miller, Court of Appeal <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/110722n6.html>

POLAND

* 19 December 2003 Supreme Court <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031219p1.html>
10 November 2005 Supreme Court [QM-mz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051110p1.html>
27 January 2006 Supreme Court [QM-mz] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060127p1.html>
* 11 May 2007 Supreme Court (Shoe leather case) [QM-aj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070511p1.html>

ROMANIA

6 June 2003 High Court of Cassation and Justice [QM-lb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030606ro.html>

RUSSIAN FEDERATION

3 March 1995 Russian Arbitration Award No. 304/1993 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950303r2.html>
* 16 March 1995 Russian Arbitration Award No. 155/1994 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950316r1.html>
* 3 April 1995, Arbitral Award, Moscow Arbitration Court [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950403r1.html>
* 25 April 1995 Russian Arbitration Award No. 200/1994 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950425r1.html>
* 25 April 1995 Russian Arbitration Award No. 142/1994 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950425r2.html>
* 25 April 1995 Russian Arbitration Award No. 161/1994 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950425r3.html>
* 28 April 1995 Russian Arbitration Award No. 400/1993 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950428r1.html>
* 15 May 1995 Russian Arbitration Award No. 321/1994 [QM-dk/mk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950515r1.html>
17 October 1995 Russian Arbitration Award No. 123/1992 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951017r1.html>
* 22 November 1995 Russian Arbitration Award No. 99/1994 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951122r1.html>
* 1 December 1995 Russian Arbitration Award No. 369/1994 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951201r1.html>
* 1 December 1995 Russian Arbitration Award No. 22/1995 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951201r2.html>
* 13 December 1995 Russian Arbitration Award No. 364/1994 [QM-am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951213r1.html>
* 19 December 1995 Russian Arbitration Award No. 133/1994 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951219r1.html>
22 January 1996 Russian Arbitration Award No. 40/1995 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960122r1.html>
31 January 1996 Russian Arbitration Award No. 228/1995 [QM-md/yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960131r1.html>
10 February 1996 Russian Arbitration Award No. 328/1994 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960210r1.html>
* 12 March 1996 Russian Arbitration Award No. 166/1995 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960312r1.html>
* 12 March 1996 Russian Arbitration Award No. 218/1995 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960312r2.html>
* 19 March 1996 Russian Arbitration Award No. 88/1995 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960319r1.html>
* 25 April 1996 Russian Arbitration Award No. 72/1995 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960425r1.html>
* 16 September 1996 Russian Arbitration Award No. 74/1995 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960916r1.html>
* 18 September 1996 Russian Arbitration Award No. 448/1995 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960918r1.html>
26 September 1996 Russian Arbitration Award No. 433/1994 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960926r1.html>
* 8 October 1996 Russian Arbitration Award No. 407/1995 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961008r1.html>
* 1 November 1996 Russian Arbitration Award No. 309/1995 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961101r1.html>
* 16 December 1996 Russian Arbitration Award No. 378/1995 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961216r1.html>
* 25 December 1996, Review Letter, Higher Arbitration Court [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/961225r1.html>
22 January 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 155/1996 [QM-yk/yc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970122r1.html>
* 27 January 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 94/1996 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970127r1.html>
* 12 February 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 261/1995 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970212r1.html>
21 February 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 373/1995 [QM-yc] http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970221r1.html>
25 February 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 430/1995 [QM-md/yc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970225r1.html>
3 March 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 82/1996 [QM-yk/yc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970303r1.html>
* 25 March 1997 Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, Resolution No. 6, 4670/96 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970325r2.html>
28 March 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 38/1996 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970328r1.html>
4 April 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 387/1995 [QM-yk/yc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970404r1.html>
11 April 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 220/1996 [QM-gb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970411r1.html>
* 11 May 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 2/1995 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970511r1.html>
13 May 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 3/1996 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970513r1.html>
* 29 May 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 439/1995 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970529r1.html>
* 4 June 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 256/1996 [QM –md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970604r1.html>
5 June 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 229/1996 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970605r1.html>
11 June 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 255/1994 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970611r1.html>
* 2 September 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 255/1996 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970902r1.html>
* 29 September 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 470/1996 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970929r1.html>
* 6 November 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No. 451/1996 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971106r1.html>
* 15 December 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No.128/1996 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971215r1.html>
* 25 December 1997 Russian Arbitration Award No.53/1997 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971225r1.html>
* 10 January 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No.65/1997 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980110r1.html>
* 12 January 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No.152/1996 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980112r1.html>
* 16 January 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No.309/1996 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980116r1.html>
* 21 January 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 99/1997 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980121r1.html>
* 22 January 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 102/1997 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980122r1.html>
* 26 January 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 76/1997 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980126r1.html>
16 February 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 33/1997 [QM-dk/km] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980216r2.html>
18 February 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 243/1996 [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980218r1.html>
2 March 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 201/1997 [QM-dk/am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980302r1.html>
5 March 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 8/1997 [QM-dk/kl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980305r1.html>
5 March 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 160/1997 [QM-dk/kl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980305r2.html>
11 March 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 487/1996 [QM-dk/sl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980311r1.html>
25 March 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 491/1996 [QM-dk/sl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980325r1.html>
6 April 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 236/1996 [QM-dk/kl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980406r1.html>
14 April 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 47/1997 [QM-dk/tk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980414r1.html>
* 25 May 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 104/1997 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980525r1.html>
* 9 June 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 263/1997 [QM-dk/kl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980609r1.html>
* 10 June 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 83/1997 [QM-dk/sl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980610r1.html>
* 23 June 1998 Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980623r1.html>
* 25 June 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 478/1996 [QM-dk/am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980625r1.html>
* 15 July 1998 Supreme Court of the Russian Federation [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980715r1.html>
11 September 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 407/1996 [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980911r1.html>
* 14 September 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 131/1996 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980914r1.html>
2 October 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 113/1997 [QM-dk:aa] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981002r1.html>
5 October 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 53/1998 [QM-dk/mk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981005r1.html>
* 6 October 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 269/1997 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981006r1.html>
22 October 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 196/1997 [QM-dk/am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981022r1.html>
* 17 November 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 164/1996 [QM-dk/am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981117r1.html>
* 24 November 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 96/1998 [QM-dk/sl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981124r1.html>
* 3 December 1998 Supreme Court of the Russian Federation [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981203r1.html>
* 18 December 1998, Arbitral Award, Maritime Commission [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981218r1.html>
* 18 December 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 288/1997 [QM-dk/sl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981218r2.html>
30 December 1998 Russian Arbitration Award No. 62/1998 [QM-dk/aa] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981230r1.html>
22 March 1999 Russian Arbitration Award No. 227/1996 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990322r1.html>
16 April 1999 Russian Arbitration Award No. 152/1998 [QM-gb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990416r1.html>
17 May 1999 Russian Arbitration Award No. 342/1998 [QM-gb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990517r1.html>
7 June 1999 Russian Arbitration Award No. 238/1998 [QM-gb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990607r1.html>
10 June 1999 Russian Arbitration Award No. 55/1998 [QM-mk/yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990610r1.html>
* 8 July 1999 Russian Arbitration Award No. 318/1997 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990708r1.html>
27 July 1999 Russian Arbitration Award No. 302/1996 [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990727r1.html>
* 2 August 1999 Russian Arbitration Award No. 516/1996 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990802r1.html>
* 11 August 1999 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for the Moscow Region [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990811r1.html>
23 September 1999 Supreme Court of the Russian Federation [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990923r1.html>
18 October 1999 Russian Arbitration Award No. 385/1998 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991018r1.html>
27 October 1999 Russian Arbitration Award No. 269/1998 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991027r1.html>
17 January 2000 Russian Arbitration Award No. 28/1998 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000117r1.html>
24 January 2000 Russian Arbitration Award No. 54/1999 [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000124r1.html>
28 February 2000 Moscow City Arbitration Court [JL&C] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000228r1.html>
* 1 March 2000 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for the Northwestern Region [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000301r1.html>
21 April 2000 Appellate Division of Moscow City Arbitration Court [JL&C] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000421r1.html>
30 May 2000 Russian Arbitration Award No. 356/1999 [QM-md/yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000530r1.html>
6 June 2000 Russian Arbitration Award No. 406/1998 [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000606r1.html>
13 June 2000 Russian Arbitration Award No. 280/1999 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000613r1.html>
21 June 2000 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for Moscow Region [JL&C] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000621r1.html>
* 24 August 2000 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for the Moscow Region [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000824r1.html>
* 6 December 2000 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for the Moscow Region [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001206r1.html>
* 10 January 2001 Russian Arbitration Award No. 101/2000 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010110r1.html>
* 19 January 2001 Russian Arbitration Award No. 129/2000 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010119r1.html>
* 25 January 2001 Russian Arbitration Award No. 88/2000 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010125r1.html>
* 9 February 2001 Russian Arbitration Award No. 161/2000 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010209r1.html>
* 22 February 2001 Russian Arbitration Award No. 114/2000 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010222r1.html>
* 27 February 2001 Russian Arbitration Award No. 276/1999 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010227r1.html>
* 27 April 2001 Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010427r1.html>
* 27 April 2001 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for the Moscow Region [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010427r2.html>
* 25 May 2001 Russian Arbitration Award No. 191/2000 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010525r1.html>
30 May 2001 Russian Arbitration Award No. 185/2000 [QM-md/yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010530r2.html>
* 30 May 2001 Russian Arbitration Award No. 239/2000 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010530r1.html>
* 25 June 2001 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for the Moscow Region [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010625r1.html>
* 17 July 2001 Russian Arbitration Award No. 419/1995 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010717r1.html>
* 30 July 2001 Russian Arbitration Award No. 198/2000 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010730r1.html>
* 17 September 2001 Russian Arbitration Award No. 16/1999 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010917r1.html>
25 September 2001 Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010925r1.html>
* 16 October 2001 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for the Western Siberia Region [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011016r1.html>
* 8 November 2001 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for the Moscow Region [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011108r1.html>
* 20 November 2001 Russian Arbitration Award No. 241/1999 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011120r1.html>
28 November 2001 Russian Arbitration Award No. 108/201 [QM-md/yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011128r1.html>
* 22 January 2002 Russian Arbitration Award No. 60/2001 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020122r1.html>
* 24 January 2002 Russian Arbitration Award No. 27/2001 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020124r1.html>
1 February 2002 Russian Arbitration Award No. 234/2000 [QM-mk/yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020201r1.html>
* 4 February 2002 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for the Moscow Region [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020204r1.html>
11 February 2002 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for the Moscow Region [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020211r1.html>
* 11 February 2002 Russian Arbitration Award No. 271/2001 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020211r2.html>
18 February 2002 Russian Arbitration Award No. 165/2001 [QM-md/yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020218r1.html>
* 28 February 2002 Russian Arbitration Award No. 2/2001 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020228r1.html>
20 March 2002 Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020320r1.html>
* 22 March 2002 Russian Arbitration Award No. 225/2000 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020322r1.html>
* 16 April 2002 Russian Arbitration Award No. 222/2001 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020416r1.html>
13 May 2002 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for the Moscow Region [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020513r1.html>
* 20 May 2002 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for the Volgo-Vyatsky Region [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020520r1.html>
* 7 June 2002 Russian Arbitration Award No. 116/2001 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020607r1.html>
* 6 August 2002 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for the Western Siberia Region [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020806r1.html>
6 September 2002 Russian Arbitration Award No. 217/2001 [QM-yk/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020906r1.html>
* 11 October 2002 Russian Arbitration Award No. 62/2002 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021011r1.html>
* 11 November 2002 Russian Arbitration Award No. 52/2002 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021111r1.html>
* 2 December 2002 Russian Arbitration Award No. 18/2002 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021202r1.html>
* 10 December 2002 Russian Arbitration Award No. 211/2001 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021210r1.html>
* 20 December 2002 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for the Volgo-Vyatsky Region [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021220r1.html>
24 December 2002 Russian Arbitration Award No. 37/2002 [QM-md/yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021224r1.html>
28 January 2003 Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation [QM-yk/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030128r1.html>
* 17 February 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 168/2001 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030217r1.html>
* 4 April 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 134/2002 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030404r1.html>
* 16 April 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 99/2002 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030416r1.html>
* 23 May 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 161/2002 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030523r1.html>
26 May 2003 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for the Moscow Region [QM-yk/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030526r1.html>
* 29 May 2003 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for the Moscow Region [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030529r1.html>
* 30 May 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 145/2002 [QM-am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030530r1.html>
* 3 June 2003 Arbitration Court [Appellate Court] for the Northwestern Region [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030603r1.html>
* 4 June 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 175/2002 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030604r1.html>
* 5 June 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 2/2002 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030605r1.html>
6 June 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 97/2002 [QM-yk/jc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030606r1.html>
* 16 June 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 135/2002 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030616r1.html>
* 16 June 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 164/2001 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030616r2.html>
* 25 June 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 151/2002 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030625r1.html>
* 26 June 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 85/2002 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030626r1.html>
25 July 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 1/2003 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030725r1.html>
* 12 August 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 176/2002 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030812r1.html>
* 15 August 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 57/2001 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030815r1.html>
* 17 September 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 24/2003 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030917r1.html>
* 22 October 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 134/2001 [QM-yk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031022r1.html>
* 30 December 2003 Russian Arbitration Award No. 58/2003 [QM-am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031230r1.html>
2 February 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 56/2003 [QM-md/am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040202r1.html>
* 3 February 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 71/2003 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040203r1.html>
16 February 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No.107/2002 [QM-md/am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040216r1.html>
* 19 February 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 65/2003 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040219r1.html>
* 24 February 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 136/2003 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040224r1.html>
* 9 March 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 91/2003 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040309r1.html>
* 12 March 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 55/2003 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040312r1.html>
* 19 March 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 135/2003 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040319r1.html>
9 April 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 129/2003 [QM-md/am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040409r1.html>
* 12 April 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 11/2003 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040412r1.html>
* 20 April 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 115/2003 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040420r1.html>
* 19 May 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 100/2002 [QM-am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040519r1.html>
* 24 May 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 138/2003 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040524r1.html>
28 May 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 175/2003 [QM-md/am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040528r1.html>
* 9 June 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 125/2003 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040609r1.html>
17 June 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No.186/2003 [QM-md/am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040617r1.html>
25 June 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 120/2003 [QM-md/ds] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040625r1.html>
* 28 June 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 167/2003 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040628r1.html>
* 3 September 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 128/2002 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040903r1.html>
* 28 September 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 157/2003 [QM-kl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040928r1.html>
* 22 October 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 4/2004 [QM-am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041022r1.html>
* 2 November 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 188/2003 [QM-kl] http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041102r1.html>
* 5 November 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 164/2003 [QM-am] http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041105r1.html>
12 November 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 174/2003 [QM-ys/dg] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041112r1.html>
* 21 December 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 39/2003 [QM-kl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041221r1.html>
23 December 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 97/2004 [QM-md/am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041223r1.html>
29 December 2004 Russian Arbitration Award No. 189/2003 [QM-kl/am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041229r1.html>
24 January 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No. 68/2004 [QM-md/am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050124r2.html>
* 24 January 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No. 66/2004 [QM-am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050124r1.html>
* 9 February 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No. 69/2004 [QM-am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050209r1.html>
* 10 February 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No. 133/2003 [QM-am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050210r1.html>
* 16 March 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No. 75/2004 [QM-am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050316r2.html>
* 16 March 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No. 155/2004 [QM-st] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050316r1.html>
* 23 March 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No. 126/2004 [QM-st] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050323r1.html>
14 April 2005 Russian Arbitration North-West Area Federal Arbitration Court [QM-ys/dg] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050414r1.html>
* 27 April 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No. 5/2004 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050427r1.html>
27 May 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No. 95/2004 [QM-md/am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050527r1.html>
* 2 June 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No. 131/2004 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050602r1.html>
* 18 July 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No 134/2004 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050718r1.html>
18 October 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No. 21/2005 [QM-md/am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051018r1.html>
* 27 October 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No. 132/2004 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051027r1.html>
* 21 November 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No. 42/2005 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051121r1.html>
30 November 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No. 76/2005 [QM-ao] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051130r1.html>
* 14 December 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No. 150/2004 [QM-st] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051214r1.html>
* 27 December 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No. 41/2005 [QM-st] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051227r1.html>
28 December 2005 Russian Arbitration Award No. 82/2005 [QM-dg/ys] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051228r1.html>
* 13 January 2006 Russian Arbitration Award No. 137/2004 [QM-md/ld] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060113r1.html>
20 January 2006 Arbitration Award 84/2005 [QM-st] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060120r1.html>
24 January 2006 Russian Arbitration Far East Area Federal Arbitration Court [QM-dg/ys] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060124r1.html>
* 26 January 2006 Arbitration Award 53/2005 [QM-as] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060126r1.html>
27 January 2006 Arbitration Award 65/2004 [QM-ak] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060127r1.html>
* 13 February 2006 Russian Arbitration Award No. 102/2005 [QM-md/ld] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060213r1.html>
* 14 February 2006 Arbitration Award 7/2005 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060214r1.html>
* 1 March 2006 Arbitration Award 101/2005 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060301r1.html>
* 9 March 2006 Arbitration Award 37/2005 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060309r1.html>
* 20 March 2006 Arbitration Award 71/2005 [QM-ak] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060320r1.html>
* 7 April 2006 Arbitration Award 20/2005 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060407r1.html>
* 13 April 2006 Arbitration Award 105/2005 [QM-am] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060413r1.html>
* 19 May 2006 Arbitration Award 122/2005 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060519r1.html>
* 30 June 2006 Arbitration Award 81/2005 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060630r1.html>
5 July 2006 Arbitration Award 133/2005 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060705r1.html>
* 24 July 2006 Arbitration Award 40/2005 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060724r1.html>
31 August 2006 Arbitration Award 9/2005 [QM-as] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060831r1.html>
* 29 September 2006 Arbitration Award 127/2005 [QM-as] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060929r1.html>
* 19 October 2006 Arbitration Award 53/2006 [QM-as] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061019r1.html>
* 15 November 2006 Arbitration Award 95/2005 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edi/cases/061115r1.html>
* 15 November 2006 Arbitration Award 30/2006 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061115r1.html>
* 29 December 2006 Arbitration Award 54/2006 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061229r1.html>
* 19 December 2008 Arbitration proceeding 14/2008 [QM-ml] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081219r1.html>
* 30 June 2009 Arbitration proceeding 11/2009 [CTN-ak] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090630r1.html>

SERBIA

12 July 1994 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Yugoslav Chamber of Commerce [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940712sb.html>
15 April 1999 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Yugoslav Chamber of Commerce [QM-ms] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990415sb.html>
22 November 2000 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-ss/sp-md/mj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001122sb.html>
12 February 2001 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Yugoslavia Chamber of Commerce [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010212sb.html>
25 May 2001 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Yugoslav Chamber of Commerce [QM-ug/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010525sb.html>
24 September 2001 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Yugoslav Chamber of Commerce [QM-js/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010924sb.html>
12 April 2002 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Yugoslav Chamber of Commerce [QM-js/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020412sb.html>
10 May 2002 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Yugoslav Chamber of Commerce [abstract-ug/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020510sb.html>
27 November 2002 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Yugoslavia Chamber of Commerce [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu./cases/021127sb.html>
9 May 2003 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Yugoslav Chamber of Commerce [QM-ug/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030509sb.html>
15 January 2004 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-sd-md/mj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040115sb.html>
23 February 2004 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040223sb.html>
27 May 2004 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040527sb.html>
9 July 2004 High Commercial Court [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040709sb.html>
23 August 2004 High Commercial Court [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040823sb.html>
13 September 2004 High Commercial Court [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040913sb.html>
21 February 2005 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce, T-15/04[QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050221sb.html>
21 February 2005 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce, T-14/04 [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050221sb2.html>
1 June 2005 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Yugoslav Chamber of Commerce [QM-js/vp-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050601sb.html>
6 November 2005 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051106sb.html>
24 January 2006 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-vv/ip-md/mj] <:http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060124sb.html>
7 February 2006 High Commercial Court [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060207sb.html>
1 September 2006 High Commercial Court [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060901sb.html>
30 October 2006 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061030sb.html>
5 January 2007 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-sg/md-mj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070105sb.html>
31 July 2007 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-js/md-mj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070731sb.html>
1 October 2007 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-ug/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071001sb.html>
13 November 2007 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-js/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071113sb.html>
28 January 2008 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-mm/md-mj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080128sb.html>
23 January 2008 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080123sb.html>
22 April 2008 High Commercial Court [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080422sb.html>
18 June 2008 Foreign Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-ic/md-mj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080618sb.html>
15 July 2008 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-ug/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080715sb.html>
15 September 2008 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-am-ts/md-mj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080915sb.html>
15 October 2008 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-br/md-mj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081015sb.html>
17 November 2008 Foreign Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-uz/us/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081117sb.html>
28 January 2009 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-vp/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090128sb.html>
2 April 2009 High Commercial Court [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090402sb.html>
4 June 2009 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-js/md-mj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090604sb.html>
17 August 2009 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090817sb.html>
19 October 2009 Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, Serbian Chamber of Commerce [QM-ms/md-mj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091019sb.html>
10 November 2009 Foreign Trade Court attached to the Serbian Chamber of Commerce (Original DVD recordings case) [QM-ms/md-mj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091110sb.html>
6 May 2010 Foreign Trade Court attached to the Serbian Chamber of Commerce (Agricultural products and cereals case) [QM-uz/md-mj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100506sb.html>
6 July 2011 Appellate Commercial Court [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/110706sb.html>

SINGAPORE

12 April 2004 High Court <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040412s7.html>

SLOVAK REPUBLIC

28 February 2001 Supreme Court [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010228k1.html>
29 March 2004 Regional Court Zilina [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040329k1.html>
4 April 2005 Regional Court Zilina [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050404k1.html>
11 October 2005 Regional Court Bratislava [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051011k1.html>
20 October 2005 Supreme Court [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051020k1.html>
15 December 2005 Regional Court Bratislava [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051215k1.html>
12 January 2006 Regional Court Trnava [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060112k1.html>
27 February 2006 District Court Nitra [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060227k1.html>
6 March 2006 Regional Court Zilina [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060306k1.html>
25 April 2006 District Court in Nitra [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060425k1.htm>
10 May 2006 Regional Court Zilina [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060510k1.html>
17 May 2006 District Court Nitra [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060517k1.html>
26 May 2006 Supreme Court [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060526k1.html>
23 June 2006 Regional Court Nitra [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060623k1.html>
27 June 2006 District Court Nitra [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060627k1.html>
29 June 2006 District Court Nitra [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060629k1.html>
3 October 2006 District Court in Nitra [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061003k1.html>
26 October 2006 Supreme Court [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061026k1.html>
15 December 2006 District Court Galanta [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061215k1.html>
8 January 2007 Regional Court Zilina (Polyethelene case) [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070108k1.html>
8 January 2007 Regional Court Zilina (Doors and furniture case) [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070108k2.html>
1 February 2007 Regional Court Bratislava [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070201k1.html>
9 March 2007 District Court Bardejov [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070309k1.html>
22 May 2007 Regional Court Kosice [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070522k1.html>
28 May 2007 Regional Court in Kosice [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070528k1.html>
18 June 2007 Regional Court Zilina [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070618k1.html>
27 June 2007 Supreme Court [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070627k2.html>
27 June 2007 Regional Court Zilina [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070627k1.html>
17 September 2007 Regional Court in Nitra [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070917k1.html>
10 October 2007 Regional Court Bratislava [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071010k1.html>
18 October 2007 District Court Brezno [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071018k1.html>
25 October 2007 Regional Court Zilina [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071025k1.html>
29 October 2007 District Court Bardejov [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071029k1.html>
7 November 2007 District Court Bratislava [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071107k1.html>
6 December 2007 District Court Dolny Kubin [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071206k1.html>
21 January 2008 District Court Dolny Kubin [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080121k1.html>
5 February 2008 District Court in Bardejov (MDF Doors Case) [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080205k1.html>
5 February 2008 District Court in Bardejov (MDF Doors Case - 2) [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080205k2.html>
5 February 2008 District Court in Bardejov (MDF Doors Case - 3) [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080205k3.html>
22 February 2008 District Court Banska Bystrica [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080222k1.html>
7 March 2008 District Court Banska Bystrica [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080307k1.html>
10 March 2008 Regional Court Zilina (Stainless steel sheets case) [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080310k1.html>
3 April 2008 Supreme Court [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080403k1.html>
29 April 2008 District Court Banska Bystrica [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080429k1.html>
30 April 2008 Supreme Court [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080430k1.html>
22 May 2008 District Court Bratislava III [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080522k1.html>
29 May 2008 District Court Nitra [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080529k1.html>
17 June 2008 District Court Dolny Kubin [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080617k1.html>
19 June 2008 Supreme Court [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080619k1.html>
24 June 2008 District Court in Brezno [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080624k1.html>
8 July 2008 District Court Dunajska Streda [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080708k1.html>
17 September 2008 District Court in Trnava (Chicken products case) [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080917k1.html>
17 September 2008 District Court in Topolcany (Beer and non-alcoholic beverages Case) [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080917k2.html>>
15 October 2008 Regional Court Nitra [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081015k1.html>
28 October 2008 Supreme Court [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081028k1.html>
29 October 2008 District Court in Nitra [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081029k1.html>
3 November 2008 Regional Court in Nitra [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081103k1.html>
12 November 2008 Supreme Court [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081112k1.html>
12 November 2008 Regional Court in Nitra [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081112k2.html>
24 November 2008 District Court Dolny Kubin [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081124k1.html>
17 December 2008 District Court in Trnava (Milk Products Case)[QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081217k1.html>
15 January 2009 District Court in Nitra [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090115k1.html>
24 February 2009 District Court in Komarno (Potatoes case) [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090224k1.html>
24 February 2009 District Court in Komarno (Ammonium sulphate Case) [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090224k2.html>
12 March 2009 District Court in Komarno (Frozen peas case) [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090312k1.html>
20 March 2009 District Court in Topolcany [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090320k1.html>
21 July 2009 District Court in Brezno (Coniferous timber Case) [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090721k1.html>
5 November 2009 District Court in Zvolen (Sports clothing case) [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091105k1.html>
1 April 2010 District Court in Dolny Kubin (Meat products case) [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100401k1.html>
13 May 2010 District Court in Trnava (Flowers, plants, and seeds case) [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100513k1.html>
19 May 2010 District Court in Trnava [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100519k1.html>
13 July 2010 District Court in Namestovo (Food Case) [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100713k1.html>
11 October 2010 District Court in Michalovce [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/101011k1.html>
20 October 2010 District Court in Trnava [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/101020k1.html>
9 March 2011 District Court in Trnava [QM-jk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/110309k1.html>

SLOVENIA

4 May 1993 Higher Court Koper [QM-mk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930504sv.html>
8 April 1998 Supreme Court [QM-sk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980408sv.html>
13 October 1999 Higher Court Lujubljana [QM-sk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991013sv.html>
14 December 2005 Higher Court Lujubljana [QM-mk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051214sv.html>

SPAIN

4 February 1997 Audiencia Provincial Barcelona [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970204s4.html>
20 June 1997 Audiencia Provincial Barcelona [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970620s4.html>
3 November 1997 Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona [QM-abd] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971103s4.html>
28 January 2000 Tribunale Supremo [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000128s4.html>
* 2 March 2000 Audiencia Provincial Granada [CISG-Spain] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000302s4.html>
27 March 2000 Audiencia Provincial de Navarra [QM-mvw] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000327s4.html>
* 16 November 2000 Audiencia Provincial Alicante [QM-prm/ao] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001116s4.html>
* 15 June 2001 Audiencia Provincial de Baleares [QM-ao] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010615s4.html>
* 18 June 2001 Audiencia Provincial de Murcia [CISG-Spain] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010618s4.html>
* 12 September 2001 Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona [QM-ak/ms] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010912s4.html>
12 February 2002 Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona [QM-jmf/gc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020212s4.html>
* 11 March 2002 Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona [QM-jmf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020311s4.html>
13 May 2002 Audiencia Provincial de Murcia [QM-rv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020513s4.html>
* 21 June 2002 Audiencia Provincial de la Coruna [QM-ak/ms] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020621s4.html>
3 October 2002 Audiencia Provincial de la Pontevedra [QM-digest] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021003s4.html>
22 January 2003 Audiencia Provincial de Navarra [QM-jo] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030122s4.html>
15 February 2003 Appellate Court Valencia [CTN-lm/ppv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030215s4.html>
21 March 2003 Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona [QM-ar] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030321s4.html>
7 June 2003 Audiencia Provincial de Valencia [QM-mri/pp] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030607s4.html>
15 February 2003 Appellate Court Valencia [CTN-lm/ppv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030215s4.html>
* 5 November 2003 Audiencia Provincial de Vizcaya [QM-eais] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031105s4.html>
27 November 2003 Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona [QM-ei] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031127s4.html>
28 January 2004 Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona [QM-psg] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040128s4.html>
2 February 2004 Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona [QM-ss] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040202s4.html>
5 February 2004 Audiencia Provincial de Cantabria [QM-ek] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040205s4.html>
2 February 2004 Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona [QM-mcv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040202s4.html>
2 February 2004 Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona [QM-ds] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040202s4.html>
* 28 April 2004 Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona [QM-ac/ds] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040428s4.html>
* 31 January 2005 Audiencia Provincial de Cuenca [QM-aCa/gca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050131s4.html>
29 March 2005 Juzgado de primera instancia Tudela [QM-suki] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050329s4.html>
31 March 2005 Audiencia Provincial de Valencia [QM-aCa/gca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050331s4.html>
26 July 2005 Appellate Court Cordoba [CTN-lm/ppv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050726s4.html>
26 September 2005 Audiencia Provincial Palencia [QM-lgmm/gca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050926s4.html>
24 February 2006 Tribunal Supremo [QM-lgmm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060224s4.html>
21 March 2006 Audiencia Provincial de Castellon [QM-rv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060321s4.html>
* 22 May 2006 Juzgado de Primera Instancia Badelona [QM-lgmm/gca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060522s4.html>
* 6 November 2006 Audiencia Provincial Girona [QM-lgmm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061106s4.html>
8 February 2007 Audiencia Provincial Pontevedra [QM-mg] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070208s4.html>
20 February 2007 Audiencia Provincial Madrid [QM-jmf/gca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070220s4.html>
13 March 2007 Audiencia Provincial Valencia [QM-lgmm/gca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070313s4.html>
22 March 2007 Audiencia Provincial Madrid [QM-mg] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070322s4.html>
16 May 2007 Tribunal Supremo [MAA-gt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070516s4.html>
3 July 2007 Audiencia Provincial Barcelona [QM-gca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070703s4.html>
18 October 2007 Audiencia Provincial de Madrid [CISG-Spain] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071018s4.html>
23 October 2007 Juzgado de Primera Instancia de La Laguna [MA-gt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071023s4.html>
19 December 2007 Audiencia Provincial de Pontevedra [QM-lgmm/gca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071219s4.html>
* 27 December 2007 Audiencia de Navarra [QM-lr/jf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071227s4.html>
* 17 January 2008 Tribunal Supremo [QM-lr/jf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080117s4.html>
* 8 April 2008 Audiencia Provincial de Valencia [QM-mvw] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080408s4.html>
10 March 2009 Audiencia Provincial Madrid [CISG-Spain] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090310s4.html>
* 24 March 2009 Audiencia Provincial Barcelona [QM-gca] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090324s4.html>
31 March 2009 Audiencia Provincial Zaragoza [QM-mv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090331s4.html>
24 April 2009 Audiencia Provincial Alicante [QM-mv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090424s4.html>
* 14 July 2009 Audiencia Provincial Madrid [CTN-ysv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090714s4.html>
15 July 2010 Audiencia Provincial de Murcia [CISG-Spain] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100715s4.html>
1 July 2013 Supreme Court [CTN-wwbz/ppv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/130701s4.html>
9 July 2013 Appellate Court Cantabria [CTN-wb/ppv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/130709s4.html>
* 28 November 2013 La Almunia de Dona Godina [CTN-lakm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/131128s4.html>
* 13 May 2014 Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona [CTN-xfn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/140513s4.html>
* 20 May 2014 Audiencia Provincial de Badajoz [CTN-xfn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/140520s4.html>

STOCKHOLM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

1998 Stockholm Chamber Arbitration Award 107/1997 [Link to Unilex case presentation (English text)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980107s5.html>
5 June 1998 Stockholm Chamber Arbitration Award <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980605s5.html>
5 April 2007 Stockholm Chamber Arbitration Award <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070405s5.html>
26 July 2005 Appellate Court Cordoba [CTN-lm/ppv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050726s4.html>
1 July 2013 Supreme Court [CTN-wwbz/ppv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/130701s4.html>
9 July 2013 Appellate Court Cantabria [CTN-wb/ppv] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/130709s4.html>

SWITZERLAND

16 December 1991 Pretore di Locarno [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/911216s1.html>
27 April 1992 Pretore Locarno Campagno [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/920427s1.html>
* 21 December 1992 Zivilgericht Basel [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/921221s1.html>
* 7 May 1993 Richteramt Berne [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930507s1.html>
9 September 1993 Handelsgericht Zürich [QM-sh/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930909s1.html>
* 6 December 1993 Tribunal Cantonal Vaud [QM-at] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/931206s1.html>
17 May 1994 Tribunal Cantonal Vaud [QM-ca/at] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940517s1.html>
* 29 June 1994 Tribunal cantonal Valais [QM-jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940629s1.html>
1 September 1994 Kantonsgericht Zug [QM-jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940901s1.html>
9 December 1994 Bezirksgericht Arbon [QM-dk/mb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941209s1.html>
* 20 December 1994 Tribunal Cantonal Valais [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/941220s1.html>
* 26 April 1995 Handelsgericht Zürich [QM-sd] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950426s1.html>
* 30 June 1995 Gerichtskommission Oberrheintal [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950630s1.html>
* 24 August 1995 Handelsgericht St. Gallen [QM-dk/ks] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950824s1.html>
21 September 1995 Handelsgericht Zürich [QM-dk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950921s1.html>
* 5 December 1995 Handelsgericht St. Gallen [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951205s1.html>
* 19 December 1995 Obergericht Thurgau [QM-jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951219s1.html>
18 January 1996 Bundesgericht [QM-dk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960118s1.html>
* 12 February 1996 Tribunale d'appelo Lugano [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960212s1.html>
11 March 1996 [01 93 0661] Tribunal Cantonal Vaud [QM-dk/kkk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960311s1.html>
* 11 March 1996 [01 93 1061] Tribunal Cantonal Vaud [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960311s2.html>
31 May 1996 Zürich Arbitration Award <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960531s1.html>
5 June 1996 Kantonsgericht Nidwalden [QM-dk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960605s1.html>
* 10 July 1996 Handelsgericht Zürich [QM-dk/ks] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960710s1.html>
8 January 1997 Obergericht Luzern [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970108s1.html>
* 5 February 1997 Handelsgericht Zürich [QM-sk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970205s1.html>
* 20 February 1997 Bezirksgericht der Saane [QM-ca/sk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970220s1.html>
3 July 1997 Bezirksgericht St. Gallen [QM-fa/vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970703s1.html>
* 26 September 1997 Handelsgericht Aargau [QM-vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970926s1.html>
* 10 October 1997 Cour de Justice Genève [QM-dk/ks] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971010s1.html>
28 October 1997 Tribunal Cantonal Valais [QM-rlr] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971028s1.html>
* 3 December 1997 Zivilgericht Basel [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971203s2.html>
* 3 December 1997 Kantonsgericht Nidwalden [QM-jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971203s1.html>
*19 December 1997 Handelsgericht des Kantons Aargau [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/971219s1.html>
15 January 1998 Pretore Lugano, Cantone del Ticino [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980115s1.html>
* 23 January 1998 Kantonsgericht Freiburg [QM-df] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980123s1.html>
29 June 1998 Tribunal Cantonal Valais [QM-jh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980629s1.html>
* 30 June 1998 Kantonsgericht Wallis [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980630s1.html>
* 16 September 1998 Bezirksgericht Unterrheintal [QM-fa] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980916s1.html>
* 21 September 1998 Handelsgericht Zürich [QM-vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980921s1.html>
* 9 October 1998 Cour de Justice Genève [QM-dk/kk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981009s1.html>
* 28 October 1998 Bundesgericht [QM-ks/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981028s1.html>
* 5 November 1998 Bezirksgericht Sissach [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981105s1.html>
* 23 November 1998 Bezirksgericht Weinfelden [QM-jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981123s1.html>
* 30 November 1998 Handelsgericht Zürich [QM-vk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981130s1.html>
* 10 February 1999 Handelsgericht Zürich [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990210s1.html>
* 25 February 1999 Kantonsgericht Zug [QM-lm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990225s1.html>
8 April 1999 Handelsgericht Zürich [QM-ca/mb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990408s1.html>
* 8 June 1999 Tribunale d'appello Lugano [QM-lm/ab] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990608s1.html>
* 11 June 1999 Handelsgericht Aargau [QM-lm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990611s1.html>
* 5 October 1999 Obergericht Basel [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991005s1.html>
* 21 October 1999 Kantonsgericht Zug 21 October 1999 [QM-dk/av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991021s1.html>
17 February 2000 Handelsgericht Zürich [QM-ca/tf] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000217s1.html>
* 11 July 2000 Bundesgericht [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000711s1.html>
* 15 September 2000 Bundesgericht [4P.75/2000] [QM-hm/ab] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000915s1.html>
15 September 2000 Bundesgericht [4C.105/2000] [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000915s2.html>
* 17 October 2000 Bundesgericht [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001017s1.html>
* 11 December 2000 Bundesgericht [QM] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001211s1.html>
22 December 2000 Bundesgericht [QM-rj/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001222s1.html>
* 17 January 2002 Handelsgericht Bern [QM-dk/ks] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020117s1.html>
* 25 February 2002 Kantonsgericht Schaffhausen [QM-dk/ks] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020225s1.html>
* 1 March 2002 Zivilgericht Basel [QM-mb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020301s1.html>
* 11 April 2002 Tribunal Cantonal Vaud [QM-lt/dl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020411s1.html>
* 23 April 2002 Kantonsgericht Schaffhausen [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020423s1.html>
28 May 2002 Bundesgergicht [excerpt] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020528s1.html>
* 9 July 2002 Handelsgericht Zürich [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020709s1.html>
* 29 July 2002 Obergericht Luzern [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020729s1.html>
13 September 2002 Cour de Justice Genève [QM-cs/jn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020913s1.html>
* 5 November 2002 Handelsgericht Aargau [QM-mk/rk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021105s1.html>
11 November 2002 Cour de Justice Genève [QM-ah/ps] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021111s2.html>
* 15 November 2002 Cour de Justice Genève [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021115s1.html>
* 2 December 2002 Tribunal Cantonal Valais [QM-cc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021202s1.html>
* 3 December 2002 Handelsgericht St. Gallen [QM-sk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021203s1.html>
*12 December 2002 Kantonsgericht Zug [QM-rj] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021212s1.html>
11 February 2003 Handelsgericht St. Gallen [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030211s1.html>
10 March 2003 Kantonsgericht Appenzell [QM-md/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030310s1.html>
* 30 April 2003 Tribunal Cantonal Valais [QM-ah] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030430s1.html>
4 August 2003 Bundesgericht [QM-vk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030804s1.html>
* 19 August 2003 Tribunal Cantonal Valais [QM-ac] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030819s1.html>
22 August 2003 Appellationsgericht Basel-Stadt [QM-md/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030822s1.html>
24 October 2003 Handelsgericht Zürich [QM-vk/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031024s1.html>
* 29 October 2003 Tribunale d'appello Lugano [QM-jg] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031029s1.html>
13 November 2003 Bundesgericht [QM-md/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031113s1.html>
18 December 2003 Handelsgericht Aargau [QM-ta/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031218s1.html>
13 January 2004 Bundesgericht [QM-pr] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040113s1.html>
* 27 January 2004 Kantonsgericht Schaffhausen [QM-ks/mk] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040127s1.html>
11 February 2004 Appelationshof Bern [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040211s1.html>
19 February 2004 Bundesgericht [QM-dr] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040219s1.html>
12 March 2004 Amtsgericht Willisau [QM-ks/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040312s1.html>
29 April 2004 Handelsgericht St. Gallen 29 April 2004 [QM-av/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040429s1.html>
7 July 2004 Bundesgericht [QM-vk/ec] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040707s1.html>
21 September 2004 Amtsgericht Luzern-Land 21 September 2004 [QM-tf/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040921s1.html>
11 October 2004 Kantonsgericht Freiburg 11 October 2004 [QM-av/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041011s1.html>
* 3 November 2004 Tribunal Cantonal Jura [QM-jh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041103s1.html>
2 December 2004 Kantonsgericht Zug [QM-jh/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041202s1.html>
22 December 2004 Handelsgericht Bern [QM-jb/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041222s1.html>
* 25 January 2005 Handelsgericht Aargau [QM-jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050125s1.html>
* 21 February 2005 Kantonsgericht Valais [QM-md/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050221s1.html>
5 April 2005 Bundesgericht [QM-md/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050405s1.html>
23 May 2005 Kantonsgericht Nidwalden [QM-ta/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050523s1.html>
* 27 May 2005 Tribunal cantonal Valais [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050527s1.html>
5 July 2005 Kantonsgericht Zug [QM-jh/md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050705s1.html>
16 August 2005 Kantonsgericht Obwalden (Horse case) [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050816s1.html>
10 October 2005 Bundesgericht [QM-Guillaume] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051010s1.html>
22 December 2005 Handelsgericht Zurich [QM-md/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/051222s1.html>
20 January 2006 Cour de Justice de Genève [QM-lgmm] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060120s1.html>
9 March 2006 Kantonsgericht Appenzell-Ausserhoden [QM-fa/jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060309s1.html>
* 12 May 2006 Cour de justice Genève [QM-cc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060512s1.html>
* 23 May 2006 Tribunal cantonal Valais [QM-nh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060523s1.html>
* 27 October 2006 Tribunal Cantonal Valais [QM-nh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061027s1.html>
* 8 November 2006 Zivilgericht Basel-Stadt [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061108s1.html>
12 December 2006 Obergericht Thurgau [QM-vk/jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061212s1.html>
19 December 2006 Obergericht Zug [QM-jb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061219s1.html>
20 December 2006 Bundesgericht [QM-vk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061220s1.html>
2 April 2007 Kassationsgericht Zürich [QM-vk/jb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070402s1.html>
19 April 2007 Pretore del Distretto di Lugano [QM-pe/sl] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070419s1.html>
* 27 April 2007 Tribunal cantonal Valais [QM-nh] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070427s1.html>
19 June 2007 Handelsgericht Aargau [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070619s1.html>
25 June 2007 Handelsgericht Zürich [QM-fa/jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070625s1.html>
17 July 2007 Bundesgericht [QM-ec/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070717s1.html>
30 August 2007 Kantonsgericht Zug [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070830s1.html>
* 6 September 2007 Kantonsgericht Appenzel Asserhoden [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070906s1.html>
13 November 2007 Bundesgericht [QM-jd] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071113s1.html>
* 13 May 2008 Kantonsgericht St. Gallen [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080513s1.html>
19 May 2008 Cour supreme du canton de Berne [QM-cc] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080519s1.html>
18 August 2008 Obergericht Appenzell Ausserhoden [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080818s1.html>
* 26 September 2008 Appellationsgericht Basel-Stadt [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080926s1.html>
26 November 2008 Handelsgericht Aargau [QM-jhb/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081126s1.html>
* 27 November 2008 Kantonsgericht Zug [QM-av/dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081127s1.html>
* 16 December 2008 Bundesgericht [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081216s1.html>
* 28 January 2009 Tribunal cantonal Valais [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090128s1.html>
* 6 February 2009 Obergericht Zurich [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090206s1.html>
3 March 2009 Obergericht Aargau (Prefabricated house case) [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090303s1.html>
* 18 May 2009 Bundesgerichtshof [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090518s1.html>
* 26 June 2009 Bundesgerichtshof [QM-fa] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090626s1.html>
19 August 2009 Handelsgericht Bern [QM-dn] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090819s1.html>
16 October 2009 Kreisgericht St. Gallen [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091016s1.html>
14 December 2009 Kantonsgericht Zug [QM-ml] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091214s1.html>
16 December 2009 Supreme Court [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091216s1.html>
17 December 2009 Supreme Court] [QM-av] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091217s1.html>
29 January 2010 Supreme Court [QM-jhb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100129s1.html>

UKRAINE

* 10 May 1999 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990510u5.html>
* 9 July 1999 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990709u5.html>
* 8 September 2000 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000908u5.html>
* 21 June 2002 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020621u5.html>
* 31 October 2002 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021031u5.html>
* 25 November 2002 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021125u5.html>
* 28 July 2003 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030728u5.html>
* 10 October 2003 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031010u5.html>
* 10 December 2003 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031210u5.html>
* 12 January 2004 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040112u5.html>
* 15 April 2004 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040415u5.html>
* 23 September 2004 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040923u5.html>
* 19 October 2004 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding[QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041019u5.html>
* 27 October 2004 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041027u5.html>
* 18 November 2004 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041118u5.html>
* 22 December 2004 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/041222u5.html>
* 2005 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050000u5.html>
* 5 July 2005 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050705u5.html>
* 19 September 2005 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-md] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050919u5.html>
* 13 February 2006 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding [QM-ak] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060213u5.html>
* 15 February 2006 Chamber of Commerce & Trade Arbitration proceeding (Coal case) [PITTS-gb] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060215u5.html>
13 April 2007 Commercial Court of Donetz Region (Crucible press case) [PITTS-ms] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071211u5.html>
6 September 2007 Donetz Appellate Commercial Court (Crucible press case) [PITTS-ms] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071211u5.html>
11 December 2007 Supreme Court of Ukraine (Crucible press case). Art. 18 [PITTS-ms] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071211u5.html>

UNITED KINGDOM

17 February 2006, ProForce Recruit Ltd v Rugby Group Ltd, Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [Unilex] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060217uk.html>
18 December 2006, The Square Mile Partnership Ltd v Fitzmaurice McCall Ltd, Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [Unilex] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061218uk.html>
1 July 2009, Chartbrook Ltd v. Persimmon Homes Ltd et al., House of Lords [Unilex] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090701uk.html>

UNITED STATES

24 October 1989, Orbisphere v. U.S., U.S. Court of International Trade <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/891024u1.html>
22 May 1990, Interag v. Stafford Phase Corp., U.S. District Court (S.D.N.Y) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/900522u1.html>
14 April 1992, Filanto v. Chilewich, U.S. District Court (S.D.N.Y.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/920414u1.html>
15 June 1993, Beijing Metals v. American Business Center, U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (5th Cir.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/930615u1.html>
6 April 1994, Brawn v. Alitalia, U.S. District Court (S.D.N.Y.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940406u1.html>
9 September 1994, Delchi v. Rotorex. U.S. District Court (S.D.N.Y.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940909u1.html>
22 September 1994, Graves v. Chilewich, U.S. District Court (S.D.N.Y.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/940922u1.html>
12 April 1995, GPL Treatment v. Louisiana-Pacific, Oregon Appellate Court <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/950412u1.html>
6 December 1995, Delchi v. Rotorex, U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (2nd Cir.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/951206u1.html>
20 August 1996, Attorneys Trust v. Videotape Products, U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (9th Cir.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960820u1.html>
21 July 1997, Helen Kaminski v. Marketing Australian Products, U.S. District Court (S.D.N.Y.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970721u1.html>
6 August 1997, Kahn Lucas v. Lark International, U.S. District Court (S.D.N.Y.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/970806u1.html>
6 April 1998, Calaturificio Claudia v. Olivieri Footwear, U.S. District Court (S.D.N.Y.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980406u1.html>
27 May 1998, Evolution Online Systems v. Koninklijke Nederland, U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (2d Cir.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980527u1.html>
29 June 1998, MCC-Marble v. Ceramica Nuova, U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (11th Cir.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980629u1.html>
27 October 1998, Mitchell Aircraft v. European Aircraft Service, U.S. District Court (N.D. Illinois) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/981027u1.html>
9 March 1999, KSTP-FM v. Specialized Communications, Minnesota District Court <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990309u1.html>
17 May 1999, Medical Marketing v. Internazionale Medico, U.S. District Court (E.D. Louisiana) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/990517u1.html>
7 December 1999, Magellan International v. Salzgitter Handel, U.S. District Court (N.E. Illinois) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/991207u1.html>
8 August 2000, Fercus v. Mario Palazzo, U.S. District Court (S.D.N.Y.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000808u1.html>
29 August 2000, Viva Vino Import Corporation v. Farnese Vini S.r.l. , U.S. District Court (E.D. Pennsylvania) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/000829u1.html>
30 January 2001, Supermicro Computer v. Digitechnic, U.S. District Court (N.D. California) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010130u1.html>
10 April 2001, Victoria Alloys v. Fortis Bank, U.S. Bankruptcy Court (N.D. Ohio) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010410u1.html>
1 May 2001, China National Metal Products v. Apex Digital, U.S. District Court (Central District, California) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010501u1.html>
27 July 2001, Asante Technologies, Inc. v. PMC-Sierra, Inc, U.S. District Court (N.D. California, San Jose Division <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010727u1.html>
Zapata v. Hearthside, U.S. District Court (N.E. Illinois). We publish eight parts of the record of these District Court proceedings:
- 8 December 2000, Ruling on pre-trial motions <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/001208u1.html>
- 18 July 2001, Memorandum opinion and judgment order [Court's ruling on buyer's motions for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010718u1.html>
- 19 July 2001, Supplement to Memorandum opinion and judgment order [Supplement to Court's opinion dated 18 July 2001] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010719u1.html>
- 15 August 2001, Memorandum opinion and order [Ruling on second motion by buyer attacking the judgment] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010815u1.html>
- 22 August 2001, Memorandum opinion and order [Ruling on seller's motion for an award of attorney's fees: ruling on seller's motion advanced against buyer's litigation counsel] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010822u1.html>
- 28 August 2001, Memorandum opinion and order [Ruling on seller's motion for an award of attorney's fees: ruling on seller's motion advanced against buyer] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010828u1.html>
- 12 February 2002. Memorandum opinion and order [Ruling related to amount of attorney's fees] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020212u1.html>
- 13 March 2002, Memorandum opinion and order [Ruling on attorneys' fees] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020313u1.html>
17 December 2001, Shuttle Packaging Systems v. Tsonakis, U.S. District Court (Western Dist. Michigan) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/011217u1.html>
26 March 2002, St. Paul Insurance Company et al. v. Neuromed Medical Systems & Support et al, U.S. District Court (S.D.N.Y) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020326u1.html>
28 March 2002, Usinor Industeel v. Leeco Steel Products, U.S. District Court (Northern Dist. Illinois) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020328u1.html>
10 May 2002, Geneva Pharmaceuticals Tech. Corp. v. Barr Labs., U.S. District Court (Southern Dist. NY) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020510u1.html>; see also Ruling on Motion, dated 21 August 2002 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020821u1.html>
21 June 2002, Schmitz-Werke v. Rockland, U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (4th Cir.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/020621u1.html>
19 November 2002, Zapata v. Hearthside, U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (7th Cir.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021119u1.html>
22 November 2002, Impuls v. Psion-Teklogix, U.S. District Court (Southern Dist. Florida) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/021122u1.html>
29 January 2003, Ajax Tool Works v. Can-Eng Manufacturing, U.S. District Court (Northern Dist. Illinois) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030129u1.html>
5 May 2003, Chateau des Charmes Wines v. Sabate USA, U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (9th Cir.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030505u1.html>
29 May 2003, Chicago Prime Packers v. Northam, U.S. District Court (Northern Dist. Illinois) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030529u1.html>
11 June 2003, BP OilInternational v. Empresa, U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (5th Cir.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030611u1.html>
20 June 2003, Standard Bent Glass Corp. v. Glassrobots Oy, U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (3d Cir.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/030620u1.html>
6 October 2003, Stawski Distributing v. Zywiec Breweries, U.S. District Court (Northern Dist. Illinois) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031006u1.html>
10 November 2003, Chateau des Charmes Wines Ltd. v. Sabaté, U.S. District Court (Northern Dist. California) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/031110u1.html>
29 March 2004, Amco Ukrservice v. American Meter Company, U.S. District Court (Eastern Dist. Pennsylvania) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040329u1.html>
29 March 2004, In re: Siskiyou Evergreen, Inc. Debtor, U.S. Bankruptcy Court [Oregon] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040329u2.html>
-  13 April 2004 U.S. District Court (Eastern Dist. Pennsylvania) Order on Motion
21 May 2004, Chicago Prime Packers v. Northam, U.S. District Court [Northern Dist. Illinois] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040521u1.html>
6 July 2004, Raw Materials Inc. v. Manfred Forberich GmbH & Co. KG, U.S. District Court [Northern Dist. Illinois] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/040706u1.html>
28 February 2005, Vision Systems, Inc. v. EMC Corporation, Superior Court of Massachusetts <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050228u1.html>
19 March 2005, Genpharm Inc. v. Pliva-Lachema A.S., U.S. District Court [Eastern Dist. New York] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050319u1.html>
30 March 2005, Caterpillar v. Usinor Industeel, U.S. District Court [Northern Dist. Illinois] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050330u1.html>
27 April 2005, Treibacher Industrie, A.G. v. TDY Industries, Inc., U.S. District Court [Alabama] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050427u1.html>
10 May 2005, Guang Dong Light Headgear Factory v. ACI International, U.S. District Court [Kansas] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050510u1.html>
23 May 2005, Chicago Prime Packers v. Norham, U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (7th Cir.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050523u1.html>
7 June 2005, Portimex v. Zen-Noh, U.S. District Court [Louisiana] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050607u1.html>
15 June 2005, Valero Marketing v. Greeni Oy, U.S. District Court [New Jersey] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050615u1.html>
16 August 2005, American Mint LLC v. GOSoftware, Inc., U.S. District Court [Pennsylvania] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/050816u1.html>
6 January 2006, American Mint LLC v. GOSoftare, Inc., U.S. District Court [Pennsylvania] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060106u1.html>
30 January 2006, American Biophysics v. Dubois Marine Specialties, U.S. District Court [Rhode Island] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060130u1.html>
7 February 2006, Beltappo Inc v. Rich Xiberta, S.A., U.S. District Court [Washington State] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060207u2.html>
7 February 2006, China North Chemical Industries v. Beston Chemical Corporation, U.S. District Court [Texas] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060207ul.html>
4 April 2006, Valero Marketing v. Green Oy, U.S. District Court [New Jersey] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060404u1.html>
1 June 2006 Multi-Juice, S.A. v. Snapple Beverage Corp., U.S. District Court [New York] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060601u1.html>
17 July 2006,Prime Start Ltd. v. Maher Forest Products Ltd. et al., U.S. District Court [Washington State] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060717u1.html>
23 August 2006 TeeVee Tunes v. Gerhard Schubert GmbH, U.S. District Court [New York] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060823u1.html>
12 September 2006 Treibacher Industrie, A.G. v. Allegheny Technologies, Inc., U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (11th Cir.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/060912u1.html>
10 October 2006 Miami Valley Paper, LLC. v. Lebbing Engoineering & Consulting GmbH, U.S. District Court [Ohio] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061010u1.html>
10 October 2006 Tyco Valves & Controls Distribution GmbH v. Tippins, Inc., U.S. District Court [Pennsylvania] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061010u2.html>
31 January 2007, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Saint-Gobain Technical Fabrics Canada Limited, U.S. District Court [Minnesota] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070131u1.html>
25 May 2007, Zhanjiang Go-Harvest Aquatic Products Co. Ltd v. Southeast Fish & Seafood Co., U.S. District Court [Florida] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases070525u1.html>
19 July 2007, Cedar Petrochemicals, Inc. v. Donghu Hannong Chemical Co., Ltd., U.S. District Court (S.D.N.Y.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070719u1.html>
19 July 2007, Valero Marketing & Supply Company v. Greeni Trading Oy, U.S. Court of Appeals (3d Circ.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070719u2.html>
28 September 2007, Easom Automation Systems, Inc. v. Thyssenkrupp Fabco. Corp., U.S. District Court [Michigan] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070928u1.html>
28 September 2007, Guang Dong Light Headgear Factory Co. Ltd. v. ACI International, Inc., U.S. District Court [Kansas] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/070928u2.html>
8 November 2007, Barbara Berry, S.A. de C.V. v. Ken M. Spooner Farms, Inc., U.S. Court of Appeals (9th Circ.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/071108u1.html>
18 March 2008, Sky Cast, Inc. v. Global Direct, U.S. District Court [Kentucky] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080318u1.html>
16 April 2008, Macromex Srl. v. Globex International, Inc., U.S. District Court [New York] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080416u1.html>
28 April 2008, Guang Dong Light Headgear Factory Co., Ltd. v. ACI International, Inc., U.S. District Court [Kansas] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080428u1.html>
9 May 2008 U.S. District Court [Delaware] (Solae, LLC v. Hershey Canada, Inc., U.S. District Court [Delaware] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080509u1.html>
19 May 2008 (The Rice Corporation v. Grain Board of Iraq) District Court [California] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080519u1.html>
19 May 2008 (Zhejiang Shaoxing Yongli Printing and Dyeing Co., Ltd v. Microflock Textile Group Corporation) District Courf [Florida] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080519u2.html>
22 May 2008 (Novelis Corp. v. Anheuser-Busch) District Court [Ohio] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080522u1.html>
16 June 2008 (BTC-USA Corporation v. Novacare et al.) District Court [Minnesota] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080616u1.html>
1 July 2008 (Dingxi Longhai Dairy, Ltd v. Becwood Technology Group, L.L.C.) District Court [Minnesota] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080701u1.html>
11 July 2008 (Valeo Systemas Electriicos S.A. de C.V. v. CIF Licensing, LLC d/b/a GE Licensing v. Stmicroelectronics, Inc.) District Court [Deleware] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080711u1.html>
25 July 2008 (Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Power Source Supply, Inc.) District Court [Pennsylvania] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080725u1.html>
20 August 2008 U.S. District Court [New York] (Hilaturas Miel, S.L. v. Republic of Iraq) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080820u1.html>
3 September 2008 (CNA International, Inc. v. Guangdon Kelon Electronical Holdings et al.) District Court [Illinois] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080903u1.html>
16 September 2008 (Key Safety Systems, Inc v. Invista, S.A.R.L., L.L.C) U.S. District Court (Eastern District, Michigan) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/080916u1.html>
7 October 2008 (Forestal Guarani, S.A. v. Daros International, Inc.) District Court [New Jersey] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/081007u1.html>
26 March 2009 (Miami Valley Paper, LLC v. Lebbing Engineering & Consulting GmbH) District Court [Ohio] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090326u1.html>
3 April 2009 (Barbara Berry S.A. de C.V. v. Ken M. Spooner Farms, Inc.) District Court [Washington State] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090403u1.html>
15 April 2009 (San Lucia S.r.l. v. Import & Storage Services, LLC) District Court [New Jersey] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090415u1.html>
26 May 2009 Macromex S.r.l. v. Globex International Inc., U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals [2d Circuit] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090526u1.html>
29 May 2009 Federal District Court [New York] (Doolim Corp. v. R Doll LLC et al.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090529u1.html>
7 July 2009 Federal District Court [Wisconsin] (Amit Israeli v. Gallina.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/090707u1.html>
3 October 2009 Federal District Court [New York] (Palm Bay International, Inc. v. Marchesi di Barolo S.p.A.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091003u1.html>
29 October 2009 (Banks Hardwoods Florida, LLC v. Iglesias S.A.) U.S. District Court [Florida] [Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091029u1.html>
29 October 2009 (Banks Hardwoods Florida, LLC v. Iglesias S.A.) U.S. District Court [Florida] [Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091019u2.html>
17 December 2009 (Innotex Precision Limited v. Horei, Inc., et al.) U.S. District Court [Georgia] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091217u1.html>
23 December 2009 Federal District Court [Arkansas] (Electrocraft Arkansas, Inc. v. Electric Motors, Ltd et al.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/091223u1.html>
21 January 2010 Golden Valley Grape Juice and Wine, LLC v. Centriys Corporation et al., U.S. District Court [California] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100121u1.html>
29 January 2010 ECEM European Chemical Marketing B.V. v. The Purolite Company, U.S. District Court [Pennsylvania] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100129u1.html>
30 March 2010 Guangxi Nanning Baiyang Food Co. Ltd. v. Long River International, Inc., U.S. District Court [New York] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100330u1.html>
31 March 2010 Belcher-Robinson, L.L.C. v. Linamar Corporation et al., U.S. District Court [Alabama] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100331u1.html>
2 April 2010 Electrocraft Arkansas, Inc. v. Super Electric Motors, Ltd et al., U.S. District Court [Arkansas] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100402u1.html>
7 April 2010 Pasta Zava S.p.A v. United States et al., Court of International Trade <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/100407u1.html>
20 October 2010 (America's Collectibles Network, Inc., d/b/a Jewelry Television, and BBJ Bangkok, Ltd. v. Timlly (HK), Timlly BBK Co., Ltd., Sunil Ratwani, and Sanjay Punjabi) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/101020u1.html>
2 December 2010 (Ho Myung Moolsan, Co. Ltd. v.Manitou Mineral Water, Inc.) U.S. District Court [New York] 07 Civ. 07483 (RJH) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/101202u1.html>
10 January 2011 (Semi-Materials Co., Ltd. v. MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc., et al.) U.S. District Court [Missouri] 4:06CV1426 FRB [LEXIS 1790] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/110110u1.html>
10 January 2011 (Semi-Materials Co., Ltd. v. MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc., et al.) U.S. District Court [Missouri] 4:06CV1426 FRB [LEXIS 1791] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/110110u2.html>
18 January 2011 (Hanwha Corporation v. Cedar Petrochemicals, Inc.) U.S. District Court [New York] 09 Civ. 10559 (AKH) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/110118u1.html>
8 February 2011 (CSS Antenna, Inc. v. Amphenol-Tuchel Electronics, GMBH.) U.S. District Court [Maryland] CCB-09-2008 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/110208u1.html>
22 February 2011 (Princesse D'Isenbourg et CIE Ltd. v. Kinder Caviar, Inc. and Kinder Caviar, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc.) U.S. District Court [Kentucky] 3: 09-29-DCR <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/110222u1.html>
14 February 2011 Federal Appellate Court (Dingxi Longhai Dairy, Ltd. v. Becwood Technology Group L.L.C.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/110214u1.html>
18 July 2011 (MSS, Inc. v. Maser Corporation) 3:09-cv-00601 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/110718u1.html>
27 July 2011 (Gruppo Essenziero Italiano, S.P.A. v. Aromi D'Italia, Inc.) CCB-08-65 <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/110727u1.html>
7 November 2011 (Al Hewar Environmental & Public Health Establishment v. Southeast Ranch, LLC and Joel Gutierre) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/111107u1.html>
9 November 2011 (ECEM European Chemical Marketing B.V. v. The Purolite Company) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/111109u1.html>
9 January 2012 (Zeeco, Inc., v. Sivec Srl) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/120109u1.html>
27 January 2012 California Court of Appeal (C9 Ventures v. SVC-West L.P) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/120127u1.html>
DC (New Jersey) 19 March 2012, 10-05321 (Beth Schiffer Fine Photographic Art, Inc., v. Coleximaging, Inc., Werner Wadon, and Po-Lielettronica, S.p.A.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/120319u1.html>
DC (Illinois) 21 March 2012, 10 C 1174 (Maxxsonics USA, Inc., v. Fengshun Peiying Electro Acoustic Company, Ltd.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/120321u1.html>
DC (Pennsylvania) 17 May 2012, CIV.A. 10-cv-03584 (Food Team International, Ltd, vs. UNILINK LLC) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/120517u1.html>
DC (Maryland) 20 July 2012, MJG-11-1991 (Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v. Hosokawa Micron International, Inc.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/120720u1.html>
DC (Texas) 24 August 2012, H-10-709 (CIMC Vehicles Group v Direct Trailer) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/120824u1.html>
DC (Florida) 23 January 2013 (2P Commercial Agency S.R.O. v. SRT USA Inc.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/130123u1.html>
DC (Wisconsin) 4 March 2013 [12-CV-667-JPS] (A. Raymond Tinnerman Manufacturing, Inc. v. Tecstar Manufacturing Company) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/130304u1.html>
DC (Illinois) 5 March 2013 [12 C 8154] (VLM Food Trading International, Inc. v. Illinois Trading Co., et al) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/130305u1.html>
31 July 2013 Federal District Court [Pennsylvania] (It's Intoxicating, Inc. v. Maritim Hotelgesellschaft mbH) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/130731u1.html>
29 August 2013 Federal District Court [State of Washington] (Simar Shipping Ltd. v. Global Fishing, Inc.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/130829u1.html>
10 September 2013 District Court [Pennsylvania] (Roser Technologies, Inc. v. Carl Schreiber GmbH) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/130910u1.html>
17 September 2013 Federal District Court [New Jersey] (FPM Financial Services v. Redline Products) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/130917u1.html>
21 October 2013 District Court, Southern District of New York (Cedar Petrochemicals, Inc. v. Dongbu Hannong Chemical Co., Ltd.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/131021u1.html>
7 February 2014 District Court, Eastern District Court of Virginia, Norfolk Division (Midatlantic International, Inc. v. ACG Flat Glass North America) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/140207u1.html>
20 March 2014 Federal District Court [Illinois] (Global Material Technologies, Inc., v. Dazheng Metal Fibre Co., Ltd) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/140320u1.html>
27 March 2014 District Court for the Eastern District Court of New York (Rienzi & Sons, Inc. v. N. Puglisi & F. Industria Paste Alimentari S.P.A.) <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/140327u1.html>

VIETNAM

5 April 1996 Vietnam Appellate Court, Case No. 74/VPPT [Link to Unilex case translation (excerpt)] <http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/960405v1.html>

With the help of many participants, we will expand the Queen Mary Case Translation Programme and other elements of the cisgw3 website.

©Pace Law School Institute of International Commercial Law - Last updated August 10, 2015